Jay Berkenbilt <q...@debian.org> wrote: > I screwed up and released tiff 3.9.0beta+deb1 to experimental earlier > this week instead of 3.9.0~beta+deb1. Now I'd like to upload 3.9.0 to > unstable. I really don't want to introduce an epoch. Is it possible to > make 3.9.0beta+deb1 just disappear? It's never been anywhere but > experimental, and it's only been there for two days. Otherwise, I'll > have to think about whether to introduce an epoch or to just contort the > version for this one release, like 3.9.0+final. I hate to use an epoch > to fix a typo instead of to handle a genuine change to the version > numbering scheme. Advice welcome. I'll delay my 3.9.0 upload a bit > until I get an answer.
Please disregard. I figured it out. I'm going to upload 3.9.0 to unstable, which will work fine because it's newer than 3.8.2. I'll upload 4.0.0beta3 to experimental which will clear out 3.9.0beta+deb1. Sorry for the noise. -- Jay Berkenbilt <q...@debian.org> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
