Requesting a freeze exception for gpib

2009-02-05 Thread Carlo Segre
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello: We recently found some serious problems with the current gpib package which have not been reported as bugs. Since udev has replaed hotplug for lenny, the udev rules need to load firmware and run gpib-config. Furthermore, since udev identi

Re: Please give back ruby1.9/1.9.0.2-9 on hppa and alpha

2009-02-05 Thread dann frazier
On Thu, Feb 05, 2009 at 09:00:43PM +0100, Helge Deller wrote: > dann frazier wrote: > > On Mon, Feb 02, 2009 at 07:04:48PM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > >> ruby1.9 still fails to build on hppa and alpha. > >> > >> On hppa, it's caused by a kernel bug, which was partially fixed (at > >> least the k

Re: I'd consider this bug very serious

2009-02-05 Thread Martin Pitt
Hello all, Adeodato Simó [2009-02-05 14:02 +0100]: > If I'm not mistaken, you're a PostgreSQL-savy persion, so in the absence > of the maintainer's opinion, I think it's appropriate to take your assessment > on the severity of this bug. It doesn't match "grave" in the text book sense of the Debia

Removing fama/... from testing?

2009-02-05 Thread Bernd Zeimetz
clone 514255 -1 -2 reassign -1 tapioca-glib reassign -2 telepathy-sharp retitle -1 tapioca-glib: should not be part of a stable release probably retitle -2 telepathy-sharp: should not be part of a stable release probably thanks Hi Release Team, please have a look at #514255 - I think it makes sen

Re: I'd consider this bug very serious

2009-02-05 Thread Martin Pitt
found 514132 95 found 472627 94lenny1 thanks Hello again, Martin Pitt [2009-02-05 23:57 +0100]: > TBH this is not really the time to fiddle with it, for Lenny I'd just > back out the original change completely. Done and uploaded, debdiff attached. @release team: This is a direct revert of the c

Re: fail2ban uploaded into sid fixing security issue

2009-02-05 Thread Adeodato Simó
* Yaroslav Halchenko [Thu, 05 Feb 2009 12:21:15 -0500]: > Unfortunately sid's version was already 1 debian revision ahead of > lenny's, but that revision is also a bug fix although not-security > related: Quoting IRC for the benefit of other release people: 18:21 yoh: please prepare and update

mdadm 2.6.7.2-1 uploaded, please unblock

2009-02-05 Thread martin f krafft
Following my recent call for testers, I've had 7 positive and 0 negative reports, so I've uploaded mdadm 2.6.7.2-1 to unstable, which should hopefully take care of those RC bugs once and for all. The new version should not have any effect on the operation within D-I at all. Please unblock. --

Re: Please give back ruby1.9/1.9.0.2-9 on hppa and alpha

2009-02-05 Thread Helge Deller
dann frazier wrote: > On Mon, Feb 02, 2009 at 07:04:48PM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: >> ruby1.9 still fails to build on hppa and alpha. >> >> On hppa, it's caused by a kernel bug, which was partially fixed (at >> least the kernel doesn't panic() anymore). Since the issue is related to >> threading

Re: exception and RFS: unionfs-fuse - fix RC bug

2009-02-05 Thread Bernd Schubert
On Thursday 05 February 2009, Adeodato Simó wrote: > * Bernd Schubert [Sat, 31 Jan 2009 18:53:34 +0100]: > > Dear release team, > > > > as I already wrote to the mentors list, there is a critical bug in > > unionfs- fuse, see below. So far nobody uploaded the package, maybe due > > to possible secu

Bug#514262: tmsnc: removal from stable

2009-02-05 Thread Steffen Joeris
Package: release.debian.org Severity: important Tags: security Hi I was working on a security update for tmsnc, a textbased msn client. When I tried to test the update, I found out that the program is not able to connect to MSN servers anymore due to a protocol missmatch. I assume that the prog

fail2ban uploaded into sid fixing security issue

2009-02-05 Thread Yaroslav Halchenko
Dear Release Team, Yesterday fresh bug report [1] spoiled my day. It concerns with ability to run DoS on a victim through injection of victim's IP into domain name... I've uploaded fixed versions both into sid and experimental with version in sid: fail2ban (0.8.3-2sid1) unstable; urgency=low

Re: freeze exception: src:rus-ispell

2009-02-05 Thread Stepan Golosunov
Adeodato Simó writes: > * Martin-Éric Racine [Thu, 05 Feb 2009 16:34:29 +0200]: > >> >> I don't think broken 0.99g5-6 reached testing. > >> >> And the "bug" #511290 it was trying to fix is controversial. The >> >> purpose of the changes is to allow some obsolete spelling variants to >> >> be consi

Re: freeze exception: src:rus-ispell

2009-02-05 Thread Martin-Éric Racine
On Thu, Feb 5, 2009 at 4:54 PM, Adeodato Simó wrote: > * Martin-Éric Racine [Thu, 05 Feb 2009 16:34:29 +0200]: > >> >> I don't think broken 0.99g5-6 reached testing. > >> >> And the "bug" #511290 it was trying to fix is controversial. The >> >> purpose of the changes is to allow some obsolete spel

Re: roundup bug (#510342)

2009-02-05 Thread Toni Mueller
Hi, On Thu, 05.02.2009 at 12:36:50 +0100, Toni Mueller wrote: > #514221 - PostgreSQL backend does not support tracker names with dashes this is a two-line patch quoting the tracker's name in SQL: diff -urNad roundup-1.4.4~/roundup/backends/back_postgresql.py roundup-1.4.4/roundup/backends/bac

Re: freeze exception: src:rus-ispell

2009-02-05 Thread Adeodato Simó
* Martin-Éric Racine [Thu, 05 Feb 2009 16:34:29 +0200]: > >> I don't think broken 0.99g5-6 reached testing. > >> And the "bug" #511290 it was trying to fix is controversial. The > >> purpose of the changes is to allow some obsolete spelling variants to > >> be considered as valid. > > Okay, I'll

Re: freeze exception: src:rus-ispell

2009-02-05 Thread Martin-Éric Racine
On Thu, Feb 5, 2009 at 2:55 PM, Adeodato Simó wrote: > * Stepan Golosunov [Wed, 04 Feb 2009 00:37:06 +0400]: > >> Martin-Éric Racine writes: > >> > The following package needs both sponsoring and a freeze exception: > >> > http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/r/rus-ispell/rus-ispell_0.99g5-

Re: Bug#514132: I'd consider this bug very serious

2009-02-05 Thread Christoph Berg
Re: Raphael Hertzog 2009-02-05 <20090205125948.gb16...@rivendell> > Do you mean that it is a regression compared to etch ? If yes, I agree > that it should be RC. It is a regression: [0] 14:49 m...@etch-amd64.volta:/etc/postgresql/8.1 1j $ sudo pg_ctlcluster 8.1 db2 start [0] 14:50 m...@etch-am

Re: Please give back ruby1.9/1.9.0.2-9 on hppa and alpha

2009-02-05 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
On 05/02/09 at 14:12 +0100, Adeodato Simó wrote: > * Lucas Nussbaum [Mon, 02 Feb 2009 19:04:48 +0100]: > > > On alpha, there's a segfault during the build. Manual builds on porter > > machines do work, though. > > Failed again with the same exact segfault. Do you want me to upload a manual build

Re: I'd consider this bug very serious

2009-02-05 Thread Mike Hommey
On Thu, Feb 05, 2009 at 01:59:48PM +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote: > On Thu, 05 Feb 2009, Michael Meskes wrote: > > severity 514132 grave > > thanks > > > > I beg to disagree. This bug will break a lot (my personal guess is about > > 80%) > > of postgresql clusters as the setup Bernd describes is

Re: exception and RFS: unionfs-fuse - fix RC bug

2009-02-05 Thread Adeodato Simó
* Bernd Schubert [Sat, 31 Jan 2009 18:53:34 +0100]: > Dear release team, > as I already wrote to the mentors list, there is a critical bug in unionfs- > fuse, see below. So far nobody uploaded the package, maybe due to possible > security implications? Or maybe since I also included two other ch

Re: Please give back ruby1.9/1.9.0.2-9 on hppa and alpha

2009-02-05 Thread Adeodato Simó
* Lucas Nussbaum [Mon, 02 Feb 2009 19:04:48 +0100]: > On alpha, there's a segfault during the build. Manual builds on porter > machines do work, though. Failed again with the same exact segfault. -- Adeodato Simó dato at net.com.org.es Debian Developer

Re: Please unblock gnome-inm-forecast 0.6.1-1.1

2009-02-05 Thread Adeodato Simó
* David Spreen [Wed, 04 Feb 2009 11:39:52 -0800]: > Hi, > I just uploaded a non-maintainer upload for the above package fixing one > release critical bug[1] to unstable. Please unblock the NMU which happened > with the consent of the maintainer. > I attached the NMU.diff, it is very small. Unbl

Re: I'd consider this bug very serious

2009-02-05 Thread Adeodato Simó
* Michael Meskes [Thu, 05 Feb 2009 11:34:54 +0100]: > severity 514132 grave > thanks > I beg to disagree. This bug will break a lot (my personal guess is about 80%) > of postgresql clusters as the setup Bernd describes is a de facto standard. > Therefore I consider grave as the right severity. Ho

Re: I'd consider this bug very serious

2009-02-05 Thread Raphael Hertzog
On Thu, 05 Feb 2009, Michael Meskes wrote: > severity 514132 grave > thanks > > I beg to disagree. This bug will break a lot (my personal guess is about 80%) > of postgresql clusters as the setup Bernd describes is a de facto standard. Do you mean that it is a regression compared to etch ? If yes

Re: freeze exception: src:rus-ispell

2009-02-05 Thread Adeodato Simó
* Stepan Golosunov [Wed, 04 Feb 2009 00:37:06 +0400]: > Martin-Éric Racine writes: > > The following package needs both sponsoring and a freeze exception: > > http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/r/rus-ispell/rus-ispell_0.99g5-7.dsc > > To put the bug in context, some recent changes in t

Re: roundup bug (#510342)

2009-02-05 Thread Toni Mueller
Hi, On Wed, 04.02.2009 at 12:48:38 +0100, Toni Mueller wrote: > I opted to upload roundup 1.4.4-3 to 'unstable' with severity 'medium' > for the time being. The package is lintian-clean. I'll most likely output a new package, 1.4.4-4, to fix the two problems reported by Sebastian Harl: #514221

I'd consider this bug very serious

2009-02-05 Thread Michael Meskes
severity 514132 grave thanks I beg to disagree. This bug will break a lot (my personal guess is about 80%) of postgresql clusters as the setup Bernd describes is a de facto standard. Therefore I consider grave as the right severity. However, I do not want to play bug tracking ping-pong, I just upg

Re: Possible unblock request for xulrunner and iceweasel

2009-02-05 Thread Daniel Baumann
Mike Hommey wrote: > I uploaded a new security/stability releases of iceweasel and xulrunner > that may be good to have in Lenny, but it might be good to wait and see > if no big regression comes with them. once you unblock iceweasel, do not forget to unblock iceweasel-l10n as well. -- Address: