* Martin-Éric Racine [Thu, 05 Feb 2009 16:34:29 +0200]:
> >> I don't think broken 0.99g5-6 reached testing.
> >> And the "bug" #511290 it was trying to fix is controversial. The
> >> purpose of the changes is to allow some obsolete spelling variants to
> >> be considered as valid.
> > Okay, I'll take this as an indication that no action from the release
> > team is needed unless further notice.
> Actually, Stepan's got that one backwards: 0.99g5-7 *restores*
> support for the contemporary spelling. Support for the traditional
> spelling never disappeared.
That's not really relevant. What is interesting is whether Stepan's
assessment that 0.99g5-5 is not affected by this issue is correct or
not.
Thanks,
--
Adeodato Simó dato at net.com.org.es
Debian Developer adeodato at debian.org
Listening to: Mª Dolores Pradera - No sé por qué te quiero
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
