Re: Question about fixing #512075

2009-01-25 Thread Aurelien Jarno
On Sun, Jan 25, 2009 at 11:50:43PM +0100, Thomas Weber wrote: > On Sun, Jan 25, 2009 at 10:18:19PM +0100, Aurelien Jarno wrote: > > On Sun, Jan 25, 2009 at 01:22:19PM +0100, Adeodato Simó wrote: > > * Thomas Weber [Sat, 24 Jan 2009 22:08:31 +0100]: > > > > > I've patched 1.0.6 instead, it turned o

Re: Question about fixing #512075

2009-01-25 Thread Aurelien Jarno
On Sun, Jan 25, 2009 at 08:37:32PM -0500, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote: > On Sun, Jan 25, 2009 at 01:22:19PM +0100, Adeodato Simó wrote: > > * Thomas Weber [Sat, 24 Jan 2009 22:08:31 +0100]: > > > > > I've patched 1.0.6 instead, it turned out to be only a one-line change. > > > Sadly, the package now

Re: FYI: Debian 5.0 ("lenny") release notes statistics

2009-01-25 Thread Vincenzo Campanella
Il giorno lun, 26/01/2009 alle 00.26 +0100, W. Martin Borgert ha scritto: > Here we go: > > da: 0 translated messages, 751 untranslated messages. > de: 595 translated messages, 16 fuzzy translations, 140 untranslated messages. > es: 574 translated messages, 98 fuzzy translations, 79 untranslated m

Re: Question about fixing #512075

2009-01-25 Thread Roberto C . Sánchez
On Sun, Jan 25, 2009 at 01:22:19PM +0100, Adeodato Simó wrote: > * Thomas Weber [Sat, 24 Jan 2009 22:08:31 +0100]: > > > I've patched 1.0.6 instead, it turned out to be only a one-line change. > > Sadly, the package now FTBFS on ARM only, > > /usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lgfortranbegin > > > Sigh,

FYI: Debian 5.0 ("lenny") release notes statistics

2009-01-25 Thread W. Martin Borgert
Here we go: da: 0 translated messages, 751 untranslated messages. de: 595 translated messages, 16 fuzzy translations, 140 untranslated messages. es: 574 translated messages, 98 fuzzy translations, 79 untranslated messages. fi: 1 translated message, 750 untranslated messages. fr: 691 translated mes

Re: Question about fixing #512075

2009-01-25 Thread Thomas Weber
On Sun, Jan 25, 2009 at 10:18:19PM +0100, Aurelien Jarno wrote: > On Sun, Jan 25, 2009 at 01:22:19PM +0100, Adeodato Simó wrote: > * Thomas Weber [Sat, 24 Jan 2009 22:08:31 +0100]: > > > I've patched 1.0.6 instead, it turned out to be only a one-line change. > > Sadly, the package now FTBFS on ARM

Re: Question about fixing #512075

2009-01-25 Thread Aurelien Jarno
On Sun, Jan 25, 2009 at 01:22:19PM +0100, Adeodato Simó wrote: * Thomas Weber [Sat, 24 Jan 2009 22:08:31 +0100]: > I've patched 1.0.6 instead, it turned out to be only a one-line change. > Sadly, the package now FTBFS on ARM only, > /usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lgfortranbegin > Sigh, back to square

Re: please unblock clamav-data

2009-01-25 Thread Marc Haber
Hi, On Thu, Jan 22, 2009 at 11:28:15PM +0100, Luk Claes wrote: > Marc Haber wrote: > > Please unblock clamav-data as this will bring more virus signatures > > into lenny. The package is built and tested automatically inside the > > debian-volatile infrastructure. > > unblocked Thanks. I immediat

Re: [Pkg-clamav-devel] The future of clamav wrt. stable/volatile

2009-01-25 Thread Martin Schulze
Stephen Gran wrote: > This one time, at band camp, Martin Schulze said: > > Michael Tautschnig wrote: > > > In the clamav packaging team we had recurring discussion about how to > > > deal with > > > clamav in the near (== lenny) and more distant (>= squeeze) future. The > > > current > > > situa

Re: php5 packages for lenny, redux

2009-01-25 Thread Luk Claes
sean finney wrote: > hi everyone, Hi > excuse the cross-posting, i just want to make sure everyone's on the > same page for what should be next for php5 -> lenny Ok, though I don't think it's that controversial :-) > someone suggested to look at using testing-security as a path to lenny for > t

php5 packages for lenny, redux

2009-01-25 Thread sean finney
hi everyone, excuse the cross-posting, i just want to make sure everyone's on the same page for what should be next for php5 -> lenny quick recap: when we last left off[1] Raphael was seeking pre-approval of a lenny-targeted upload of php5. because of library dependency changes, this needed to

Re: Debian 5.0 ("lenny") release notes: Call for translations, again

2009-01-25 Thread Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña
On Sat, Jan 24, 2009 at 11:10:46PM +0100, W. Martin Borgert wrote: > Hello world, > > sorry for repeating myself: It's high time to translate the > release notes. The current statistics doesn't look good: (...) > es: 0 translated messages, 734 untranslated messages. The current stats for Spanish

Re: [Pkg-clamav-devel] The future of clamav wrt. stable/volatile

2009-01-25 Thread Stephen Gran
This one time, at band camp, Martin Schulze said: > Michael Tautschnig wrote: > > In the clamav packaging team we had recurring discussion about how to deal > > with > > clamav in the near (== lenny) and more distant (>= squeeze) future. The > > current > > situation is as follows: > > > > - We'

proposing gcc-4.1 / gcc-4.2 for testing

2009-01-25 Thread Matthias Klose
Please consider for testing: gcc-4.1 (4.1.2-25) sid; urgency=low * Update backport for PR28322 (Gunther Nikl). gcc-4.2 (4.2.4-6) unstable; urgency=low * Update to SVN 20090117 from the ubuntu/gcc-4_2-branch. - Fix PR c++/38850, PR c++/36019. * Update backport for PR28322 (Gunt

Re: The future of clamav wrt. stable/volatile

2009-01-25 Thread Martin Schulze
Michael Tautschnig wrote: > In the clamav packaging team we had recurring discussion about how to deal > with > clamav in the near (== lenny) and more distant (>= squeeze) future. The > current > situation is as follows: > > - We've got severly outdated clamav packages in etch(-security). > - A

The future of clamav wrt. stable/volatile

2009-01-25 Thread Michael Tautschnig
Dear Release Team, In the clamav packaging team we had recurring discussion about how to deal with clamav in the near (== lenny) and more distant (>= squeeze) future. The current situation is as follows: - We've got severly outdated clamav packages in etch(-security). - A few packages depend on c

Re: Question about fixing #512075

2009-01-25 Thread Adeodato Simó
* Thomas Weber [Sat, 24 Jan 2009 22:08:31 +0100]: > I've patched 1.0.6 instead, it turned out to be only a one-line change. > Sadly, the package now FTBFS on ARM only, > /usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lgfortranbegin > Sigh, back to square one. Okay, CC'ing the arm buildd maintainers to see if the re

Re: please unblock tau/2.16.4-1.2

2009-01-25 Thread Neil McGovern
On Fri, Jan 16, 2009 at 11:11:50PM +1100, Aníbal Monsalve Salazar wrote: > On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 08:41:45PM +1100, Anibal Monsalve Salazar wrote: > >On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 08:34:22AM +0100, Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt wrote: > >>Aníbal Monsalve Salazar writes: > >>>please unblock tau/2.16.4-1.2 > >>

Re: Debian 5.0 ("lenny") release notes: Call for translations, again

2009-01-25 Thread Helge Kreutzmann
Hello Thomas, On Sun, Jan 25, 2009 at 10:22:32AM +0100, Thomas Mueller wrote: > Is someone working on the de-translations? Yes. > Need help? Yes. Please join the work on debian-l10n-german. In essence: a) Checkout the current version (see below, i.e. svn co svn://svn.debian.org/ddp/manuals/tr

Re: Debian 5.0 ("lenny") release notes: Call for translations, again

2009-01-25 Thread Thomas Mueller
Is someone working on the de-translations? Need help? This is the only langauge I can offer support. Just let me know! take care Tom Am Samstag, 24. Januar 2009 schrieb W. Martin Borgert: > Hello world, > > sorry for repeating myself: It's high time to translate the > release notes. The curren

Re: unblock quassel 0.3.1+dfsg-1

2009-01-25 Thread Thomas Mueller
hi, thanks alot for your reply. I expected this answer - I just wanted to give it a try! ;-) thx alot, Tom Am Samstag, 24. Januar 2009 schrieb Adeodato Simó: > * Thomas Mueller [Sat, 24 Jan 2009 20:06:21 +0100]: > > dear release team, > > > > 10 days have passed since the upload of quassel 0.3.