Steve Langasek writes:
> On Mon, Mar 24, 2008 at 12:23:34PM +0100, Christian Perrier wrote:
> > (CC'ing Riku and Matthias for the sake of it. No need to CC me on
> > replies, I read -release)
>
> > I was working on a possible NMU of atlas3 to fix its longstanding
> > debconf l10n issues.
>
> > Ra
On Mon, Mar 24, 2008 at 12:23:34PM +0100, Christian Perrier wrote:
> (CC'ing Riku and Matthias for the sake of it. No need to CC me on
> replies, I read -release)
> I was working on a possible NMU of atlas3 to fix its longstanding
> debconf l10n issues.
> Raphaël Laboissière then mentioned /me th
Rafael,
am Mon, Mar 24, 2008 at 05:34:51PM +0100 hast du folgendes geschrieben:
> > There was visible progress: it's building for almost 4 hours now...
> How did it go magically from position 472 in the Needs-Build queue aome
> hours ago to the Building state now?
check [0]. As you probably can'
On Mon, Mar 24, 2008 at 05:30:36PM +, Riku Voipio wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 24, 2008 at 05:00:47PM +0100, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
> > On Mon, Mar 24, 2008 at 12:11:49PM +, Riku Voipio wrote:
> > > As soon as meep and mpb build on hppa/mips atlas3 is ripe for removal.
> > > So no NMU's neccesary.
* Luk Claes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-03-24 17:06]:
> Rafael Laboissiere wrote:
> > * Rafael Laboissiere <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-03-23 22:42]:
> >> The other blocker now is shogun, which is near the end of the Needs-Build
> >> queue on hppa. Could that also be given back?
>
> Giving back doesn
Quoting Riku Voipio ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> It's atlas3, not atlas that's is going to be removed (as part of
> gfortran transition). But yes, please don't worry about it.
Hmm, I apparently got confused as well (see the message I sent about
30 mins ago). Sorry for the noise, then.
signature.as
Quoting Pierre Habouzit ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
>
> OTOH atlas suffers from #430227 too, so if it's scheduled for removal
> at some point, it's better not to worry too much I'd say.
Yes, found that one while preparing a possible NMU. However, I'm far
far far away from being able to provide a fix
On Mon, Mar 24, 2008 at 05:00:47PM +0100, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 24, 2008 at 12:11:49PM +, Riku Voipio wrote:
> > As soon as meep and mpb build on hppa/mips atlas3 is ripe for removal.
> > So no NMU's neccesary. Same for lapack3 and refblas3.
> OTOH atlas suffers from #430227 t
Rafael Laboissiere wrote:
> * Rafael Laboissiere <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-03-23 22:42]:
>
>> * Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-03-23 22:12]:
>>
>>> Rafael Laboissiere <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
petsc is still in Dep-Wait status on arm, mips, mpisel, and s390 [1], even
On Mon, Mar 24, 2008 at 12:11:49PM +, Riku Voipio wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 24, 2008 at 12:23:34PM +0100, Christian Perrier wrote:
> > I was working on a possible NMU of atlas3 to fix its longstanding
> > debconf l10n issues.
>
> > Raphaël Laboissière then mentioned /me that atlas3 will probably
>
* Rafael Laboissiere <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-03-23 22:42]:
> * Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-03-23 22:12]:
>
> > Rafael Laboissiere <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > petsc is still in Dep-Wait status on arm, mips, mpisel, and s390 [1], even
> > > though lam 7.1.2-1.3 has succ
Hi,
I asked ktranslator's maintainer whether #453337 can be upgraded to serious
but got no reply. So please consider upgrading it to serious or grave.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mon, Mar 24, 2008 at 12:23:34PM +0100, Christian Perrier wrote:
> I was working on a possible NMU of atlas3 to fix its longstanding
> debconf l10n issues.
> Raphaël Laboissière then mentioned /me that atlas3 will probably
> disappear at some moment
As soon as meep and mpb build on hppa/mip
(CC'ing Riku and Matthias for the sake of it. No need to CC me on
replies, I read -release)
I was working on a possible NMU of atlas3 to fix its longstanding
debconf l10n issues.
Raphaël Laboissière then mentioned /me that atlas3 will probably
disappear at some momentbut, on the other hand, t
On Mon, Mar 24, 2008 at 10:36:46AM +0100, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
>
> But unlike others that doesn't seems to care a lot about which
> compiler is default in lenny, I would be sad to not see gcc-4.3 our
> default compiler. It comes with a lot of enhanced warnings and error
> checking, that I've s
On Sun, Mar 23, 2008 at 08:11:31PM +, Matthias Klose wrote:
> > > This will last up to the lenny release, and the toolchain is to be
> > > freezed next week. So I don't ...
> > ... think you'll have to support that patch actively for too long.
>
> wrong, once released with the patch you'll
On Thu, Mar 20, 2008 at 03:22:29PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 18, 2008 at 10:01:51PM +0100, Philipp Kern wrote:
> > Britney thinks that this is a fake (faux) package. It probably requires
> > manual intervention by a ftp-master. I will try to get a reply on that.
>
> Already done
17 matches
Mail list logo
