On Mon, Mar 24, 2008 at 12:23:34PM +0100, Christian Perrier wrote: > (CC'ing Riku and Matthias for the sake of it. No need to CC me on > replies, I read -release)
> I was working on a possible NMU of atlas3 to fix its longstanding > debconf l10n issues. > Raphaël Laboissière then mentioned /me that atlas3 will probably > disappear at some moment....but, on the other hand, the "atlas" > package could benefit from these debconf l10n improvements (strings > are identical among packages) such as things he reported in #472366 > So, an l10n NMU of atlas would make sense. No comment on the transition issues, but I hope you're fixing these l10n issues by removing all of the idiotic debconf templates *completely* from the package. No one needs a library package popping up a high-priority debconf note to read the contents of /proc/cpuinfo to them, and my gorge rises every time I see one of these debconf notes from the atlas family of packages. -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. Ubuntu Developer http://www.debian.org/ [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
