Hi,
please binNMU apache2-mpm-itk to build against apache2 2.2.8-1.
Thanks.
Stefan
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
On 2008-01-21, Nicolas Boullis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Nico and others,
>
> On Sun, Jan 20, 2008 at 02:31:39PM +0100, Nico Golde wrote:
>> Hi,
>> the following CVE (Common Vulnerabilities & Exposures) id was
>> published for libcdio some time ago.
>>
>> CVE-2007-6613[0]:
>> | Stack-based b
On 22/01/2008, Massimo Dal Zotto wrote:
> I am therefore requesting that the following packages are removed from
> unstable:
Then file a bug as explained in [1], RMs only deal with removals from
testing.
1. http://wiki.debian.org/ftpmaster_Removals
Cheers,
--
Cyril Brulebois
pgp5fMlpqpOzr.p
Hi,
I am the maintainer of tclx8.3. This package, which was intended only
for use with tcl8.3, is now obsolete and has been replaced by tclx8.4.
As far as I know it has no reverse dependencies (tested with dak on merkel).
I am therefore requesting that the following packages are removed
from unst
Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Domenico Andreoli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> boost? which transition is blocked by boost?
> boost doesn't block a transition, but is part of one. boost and icu need
> to go in at the same time (both having changed sonames), but they have
> be
On Tue, Jan 22, 2008 at 09:18:11PM +0800, Emfox Zhou wrote:
> I made no significant change between pcmanx-gtk2 0.3.7-1 and 0.3.7-2,
> but according to the build log[0], 0.3.7-2 built failed while 0.3.7-1
> was succeed. I cannot find anything wrong I did, so please schedule a
> second build to see i
(Tell me if I am on the wrong list.)
I made no significant change between pcmanx-gtk2 0.3.7-1 and 0.3.7-2,
but according to the build log[0], 0.3.7-2 built failed while 0.3.7-1
was succeed. I cannot find anything wrong I did, so please schedule a
second build to see if it's ok.
[0] http://buildd
On Tue, Jan 22, 2008 at 12:54:29PM +0100, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> Le mardi 22 janvier 2008 à 12:12 +0100, Domenico Andreoli a écrit :
> > > There have been no moves from the top blockers - being boost and
> > > wxwidgets - and I hope having it set as a release goal will help.
> >
> > boost? whic
"Ari Pollak" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Jan 21, 2008 3:24 PM, Ari Pollak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> and the list of bugs that need to be fixed to work with python as 2.5
>> is here:
>> http://people.debian.org/~terpstra/message/20071005.180427.1dddb386.en.html
> Er, how do i clipboarded?
Domenico Andreoli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> boost? which transition is blocked by boost?
boost doesn't block a transition, but is part of one. boost and icu need
to go in at the same time (both having changed sonames), but they have
been stuck because gcj-4.2 has quite a few porting problems.
Le mardi 22 janvier 2008 à 12:12 +0100, Domenico Andreoli a écrit :
> > There have been no moves from the top blockers - being boost and
> > wxwidgets - and I hope having it set as a release goal will help.
>
> boost? which transition is blocked by boost?
The boost packages only support python2.4
Hi,
the following packages support building against multiple python versions
and require a binNMU for adding python2.5 support.
mmpython_0.4.10-1, 1, Rebuild with python2.5 support, alpha, amd64, arm, hppa,
i386, ia64, m68k, mips, mipsel, powerpc, s390, sparc
pyalsaaudio_0.2-1, 1, Rebuild with p
Le mardi 22 janvier 2008 à 11:58 +0100, Matthias Klose a écrit :
> If some people are unwilling to use metadata (Steve Langasek's mail
> about which packages need a rebuild is unanswered), then it should not
> hinder others to use it correctly instead of moving it out of our
> metadata data base.
Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Otavio Salvador <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> unblock pciutils/1:2.2.4-1.1
>
> You've asked for this unblock, but it still is not a valid candidate for
> testing because of #396640 (and friends). You will need to resolve this
> bug before pciut
Ari Pollak writes:
> Hi Release Team,
>
> As far as i can tell, nobody has brought up upgrading the default
> Python to 2.5 as a release goal. Joss outlined the steps necessary for
> the transition here:
> http://people.debian.org/~terpstra/message/20071005.180427.1dddb386.en.html
> and the list o
On Tue, Jan 22, 2008 at 11:49:16AM +0100, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> Le lundi 21 janvier 2008 à 15:24 -0500, Ari Pollak a écrit :
> >
> > As far as i can tell, nobody has brought up upgrading the default
> > Python to 2.5 as a release goal. Joss outlined the steps necessary for
> > ...
> >
> > I'm
Le lundi 21 janvier 2008 à 15:24 -0500, Ari Pollak a écrit :
> Hi Release Team,
>
> As far as i can tell, nobody has brought up upgrading the default
> Python to 2.5 as a release goal. Joss outlined the steps necessary for
> the transition here:
> http://people.debian.org/~terpstra/message/2007100
Otavio Salvador <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> unblock pciutils/1:2.2.4-1.1
You've asked for this unblock, but it still is not a valid candidate for
testing because of #396640 (and friends). You will need to resolve this
bug before pciutils will be updated in lenny.
Marc
--
Fachbegriffe der Infor
On 19/01/08 at 16:49 +0100, Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt wrote:
> Petter Reinholdtsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > [Lucas Nussbaum]
> >> Wouldn't it be better to first try to report and solve all the
> >> issues we can easily report and solve? That is:
> > This is the kind of feedback I was interested
Nicolas Boullis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Mon, Jan 14, 2008 at 04:39:13PM -0700, Debian testing watch wrote:
>> FYI: The status of the em8300 source package
>> in Debian's testing distribution has changed.
>>
>> Previous version: 0.16.3-1
>> Current version: (not in testing)
>> Hint:
20 matches
Mail list logo
