On 2007-12-19, Scott Kitterman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This was recently discussed on the Ubuntu lists:
>
> https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-devel/2007-December/024877.html
I agree more or less in whta that ubuntu dude says.
/Sune
- on of your friendly kde packagers
--
To UNSUBSC
martin f krafft wrote:
> subject says it all; please.
unblocked
Cheers
Luk
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Aníbal Monsalve Salazar wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 19, 2007 at 03:03:09PM +1100, Niv Sardi wrote:
>> Thanks anibal,
>>
>> for the explanation, my mail setup is b0rked and can't send signed
>> messages, hope to fix that soon !
>>
>> xfsprogs was uploaded just too short for the freeze, it fixes many
>> bu
Scott Kitterman wrote:
> On Wednesday 19 December 2007 12:06, Holger Levsen wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I would like to know what the stable release managers plan to do regarding
>> flashplugin-nonfree in etch.
>>
>> As I see it, there are three options:
>>
>> 1. do nothing, keep a broken package in etch
>
On Wednesday 19 December 2007 12:06, Holger Levsen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I would like to know what the stable release managers plan to do regarding
> flashplugin-nonfree in etch.
>
> As I see it, there are three options:
>
> 1. do nothing, keep a broken package in etch
>
> 2. remove the broken package f
Le December 19, 2007 12:06:55 pm Holger Levsen, vous avez écrit :
> Hi,
>
> I would like to know what the stable release managers plan to do regarding
> flashplugin-nonfree in etch.
>
> As I see it, there are three options:
>
> 1. do nothing, keep a broken package in etch
>
> 2. remove the broken p
Hi,
I would like to know what the stable release managers plan to do regarding
flashplugin-nonfree in etch.
As I see it, there are three options:
1. do nothing, keep a broken package in etch
2. remove the broken package from etch
3. request another upload, as the version currently in stable-
subject says it all; please.
--
.''`. martin f. krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
: :' : proud Debian developer, author, administrator, and user
`. `'` http://people.debian.org/~madduck - http://debiansystem.info
`- Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing systems
la lune, c'es
On Wed, Dec 19, 2007 at 03:03:09PM +1100, Niv Sardi wrote:
>Thanks anibal,
>
>for the explanation, my mail setup is b0rked and can't send signed
>messages, hope to fix that soon !
>
>xfsprogs was uploaded just too short for the freeze, it fixes many
>bugs, and is much faster, it should go to stabl
On Tue, Dec 18, 2007 at 06:41:26PM -0800, Zack Weinberg wrote:
> I don't trust g++ to have maintained ABI compatibility in either
> direction across releases since libstdc++6, but that's because I'm
> quite painfully aware of just how easy it is to break C++ ABIs by
> accident. There's been no *de
On Tue, Dec 18, 2007 at 07:37:52PM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 18, 2007 at 06:41:26PM -0800, Zack Weinberg wrote:
> > As I said to Steve, all the actual breakage I can find evidence for
> > involved gcc3.x, there may not be a problem with the various 4.x
> > series and boost. But I
11 matches
Mail list logo
