On Tue, Dec 18, 2007 at 07:37:52PM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 18, 2007 at 06:41:26PM -0800, Zack Weinberg wrote:
> > As I said to Steve, all the actual breakage I can find evidence for
> > involved gcc3.x, there may not be a problem with the various 4.x
> > series and boost.  But I sure wouldn't rely on it.
> Well, here's your chance to find some ABI breakage in gcc 4, boost
> 1.34.1-2.1 is in unstable. :)

And failed to build.

Bastian

-- 
Virtue is a relative term.
                -- Spock, "Friday's Child", stardate 3499.1


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to