On Sun, Nov 25, 2007 at 11:05:15PM +0100, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> could anyone please schedule binNMUs for the libgladeui transition? This
> should probably be done with a dep-wait on libgladeui-1-dev 3.4.
> anjuta_2:2.2.2-1, recompile against libgladeui-1-7, 1, alpha amd64 arm hppa
> i386 ia6
Steve Langasek wrote:
> Do you know for which architectures the rebuild is needed, or should we
> schedule binNMUs for all architectures to be sure?
>
I do not know which architectures need the rebuild. There is no information
about which architectures become ABI incompatible with (de)activation
On Sun, Nov 25, 2007 at 06:04:04PM -0500, Kamaraju S Kusumanchi wrote:
> Texamcs depends upon guile-1.8-libs. However guile libraries are ABI
> incompatible when built with and without the threads support.
> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=439923
> The current package in unstable
Texamcs depends upon guile-1.8-libs. However guile libraries are ABI
incompatible when built with and without the threads support.
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=439923
The current package in unstable is built against guile (with threads
enabled). However the latest guile packag
Hi,
could anyone please schedule binNMUs for the libgladeui transition? This
should probably be done with a dep-wait on libgladeui-1-dev 3.4.
anjuta_2:2.2.2-1, recompile against libgladeui-1-7, 1, alpha amd64 arm hppa
i386 ia64 mips mipsel powerpc s390 sparc
libgnomedb3_3.0.0-2, recompile agains
Jay Berkenbilt wrote:
> Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> At long last, boost has cleared the jump, and you should feel free
>> to upload icu 3.8 now. Sorry for the long wait.
>
> Great, thanks. I've been monitoring it, so I knew it was close, and I
> understand that there are lots
6 matches
Mail list logo
