Raphael Hertzog wrote:
Hi,
On Tue, 10 Jul 2007, Philippe Cloutier wrote:
Please remove nvidia-graphics-drivers 1.0.8776-4 from testing.
Also, if the release team could find extra time, please remove
nvidia-graphics-legacy-modules-*.
Can you explain why the release team would do that
On Tue, Jul 10, 2007 at 09:39:06PM +0200, Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
> libgpod had a soname change. The following rdepends should probably be
> binNMUed (I've built all of them locally successfully against the new
> version):
> tripod_0.7.0-1, rebuild against libgpod2, 1, alpha amd64 arm hppa i386 i
Hi,
iso-codes 1.2-1 has been sitting in unstable for 10 days and is blocked
because of the udeb. If the installer team does not object, could you
please unblock iso-codes to migrate to testing?
Regards,
Tobias
--
Tobias Toedter | Your lucky number is 3562364958674928.
Hamburg, Germany | Wat
Dear SRMs,
Please accept (I suppose for r2) lib3ds 1.2.0-4.1+etch1, just uploaded to
proposed-updates.
This is a reupload of my previous NMU, lib3ds 1.2.0-4.2, which missed etch
r0 by a day due to a missing hppa build.
The upload fixes bug #399761, a bug that resulted in previous versions of
the
Thorsten Glaser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Otavio Salvador dixit:
>
>>suggest you to produce a set of patches to implment it and proposed it
>>to debian-devel and then as release goal (on another thread).
>
> Hm, who is “you” in this case? For me, as mksh maintainer, it's “just”
> important tha
Please binNMU these packages on all architectures (rebuild will add
support for python2.5):
pycairo_1.4.0-2, 1, Rebuild to get python2.5 extensions, alpha amd64 arm hppa
i386 ia64 mips mipsel powerpc s390 sparc m68k
pygobject_2.12.3-2, 1, Rebuild to get python2.5 extensions, alpha amd64 arm
hppa
libgpod had a soname change. The following rdepends should probably be
binNMUed (I've built all of them locally successfully against the new
version):
tripod_0.7.0-1, rebuild against libgpod2, 1, alpha amd64 arm hppa i386 ia64
m68k mips powerpc s390
(has RC bugs and is not in testing, though)
rh
On Tue, Jul 10, 2007 at 03:09:39PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
> On Tuesday 10 July 2007 10:13, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > > openssl: binNMU for ia64, s390, sparc
> > The most recent version on all three archs already has correct udeb
> > shlibdeps.
> Are you sure?
> $ dpkg -f libcrypto0.9.8-udeb_0.9
Andreas Barth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> The release team already did it, however based on their own
> investigations to allow linux-2.6 to go through.
Given that the problem that causes the nVidia drivers to not work was
already fixed upstream in 2.6.22, it would have been nice for users in
t
* Raphael Hertzog ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [070710 17:36]:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, 10 Jul 2007, Philippe Cloutier wrote:
> > Please remove nvidia-graphics-drivers 1.0.8776-4 from testing.
> >
> > Also, if the release team could find extra time, please remove
> > nvidia-graphics-legacy-modules-*.
>
> Can yo
Otavio Salvador dixit:
>suggest you to produce a set of patches to implment it and proposed it
>to debian-devel and then as release goal (on another thread).
Hm, who is “you” in this case? For me, as mksh maintainer, it's “just”
important that all shells that CAN be used as /bin/sh have the exact
Thorsten Glaser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Petter Reinholdtsen dixit:
>
>>> Please consider keeping current policy and implementing the
>>> alternatives system like the window manager stuff in the Debconf
>>> tutorial.
>>
>>I believe the reason /bin/sh replacment isn't done using alternatives
>
Petter Reinholdtsen dixit:
>> Please consider keeping current policy and implementing the
>> alternatives system like the window manager stuff in the Debconf
>> tutorial.
>
>I believe the reason /bin/sh replacment isn't done using alternatives
>it to reduce the possibility of leaving the system co
[Thorsten Glaser]
> First of, this is already possible, so that wouldn't be a change,
> just keeping currently existing behaviour.
Exactly. So no really need to make it _easier_ to use anything except
dash, as dash is proven to speed up the boot by at least 7%. None of
the others have documente
Hi,
On Tue, 10 Jul 2007, Philippe Cloutier wrote:
> Please remove nvidia-graphics-drivers 1.0.8776-4 from testing.
>
> Also, if the release team could find extra time, please remove
> nvidia-graphics-legacy-modules-*.
Can you explain why the release team would do that? You're not the
maintainer
Petter Reinholdtsen dixit:
>I do not see the advantage of increasing the complexity by making it
>easier to change /bin/sh to anything but dash and bash.
First of, this is already possible, so that wouldn't be a change, just
keeping currently existing behaviour.
Second, Debian policy states that
On Tuesday 10 July 2007 10:13, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > openssl: binNMU for ia64, s390, sparc
>
> The most recent version on all three archs already has correct udeb
> shlibdeps.
Are you sure?
$ dpkg -f libcrypto0.9.8-udeb_0.9.8e-5+b1_sparc.udeb Depends
libc6 (>= 2.5-5), zlib1g (>= 1:1.2.3.3.dfs
On Mon, Jul 09, 2007 at 01:42:14PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
> Due to a missing udeb: line in the shlibs file for zlib1g, a number of
> udebs currently have an incorrect dependency on zlib1g instead of
> zlib1g-udeb, which breaks daily builds.
> The fixed zlib1g is now available for all architectur
18 matches
Mail list logo
