Josselin Mouette wrote:
> Le jeudi 28 décembre 2006 à 17:29 -0800, Thomas Bushnell BSG a écrit :
> > On Fri, 2006-12-29 at 01:56 +0100, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> > > Now, if you don't provide us with the necessary data, we won't be able
> > > to fix the regression it introduces in gnucash.
> >
> >
My package, vcs-tree 0.3.1-1, has a significant improvement compared to the
etch version of 0.2.2-4. It uses a new form of delivery that won't
break when SBCL changes binary "fasl" formats.
However, 0.3.1-1, is stuck in unstable because of an SBCL bug on the
sparc architecture which prevents this
On Friday 29 December 2006 03:10, Steve Langasek wrote:
> It was? I don't remember this... I certainly wanted to make sure etch
> didn't release with ancient, lingering versions of python like 2.1 and
> 2.2, but from a release POV I never had strong feelings about getting
> rid of python 2.3, whi
On Mon, Dec 25, 2006 at 09:16:29PM +0100, Isaac Clerencia wrote:
> On Sunday, 24 December 2006 10:06, Andreas Barth wrote:
> > Please allow us to remind you once again on the upload policy: If your
> > upload is not meant for Etch, do not upload it to unstable but to
> > experimental. If your uplo
On Thu, 2006-12-28 at 18:14 -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > What about users who are depending on Python 2.3? Do they just lose?
>
> Users who depend on obsolete software always lose when the bar moves. I
> don't find that a compelling reason to keep python2.3 around for another
> release cycle
On Thu, Dec 21, 2006 at 02:21:40PM -0800, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
> On Wed, 2006-12-20 at 19:51 -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > On Tue, Dec 19, 2006 at 11:17:03AM -0800, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
> > > The python team has apparently decreed that python 2.3 will not be in
> > > etch. This forc
On Fri, Dec 22, 2006 at 12:38:05AM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote:
> An explicitely stated goal of the release team was to reduce the
> number of supported python versions for the next stable release.
It was? I don't remember this... I certainly wanted to make sure etch
didn't release with ancient,
Le jeudi 28 décembre 2006 à 17:29 -0800, Thomas Bushnell BSG a écrit :
> On Fri, 2006-12-29 at 01:56 +0100, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> > Now, if you don't provide us with the necessary data, we won't be able
> > to fix the regression it introduces in gnucash.
>
> There are clearly two plausible sol
On Tue, Dec 19, 2006 at 02:16:54AM -0800, Peter Ronnquist wrote:
> It seems like eclipse will not be part of the etch release. Is this
> a mistake?
No, it is not; it's a direct consequence of the eclipse maintainers not
having a releasable package at the appropriate point in the release cycle.
>
On Fri, 2006-12-29 at 01:56 +0100, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> Now, if you don't provide us with the necessary data, we won't be able
> to fix the regression it introduces in gnucash.
Here is a sample file; I suspect the offending character is the space,
if I'm reading Marc Brockschmidt's regex righ
On Fri, 2006-12-29 at 01:56 +0100, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> Now, if you don't provide us with the necessary data, we won't be able
> to fix the regression it introduces in gnucash.
There are clearly two plausible solutions to the underlying problem:
1. Change gnucash to conform to the new behavi
Hello release team,
I just uploaded epiphany-browser, with only dependency changes (added
one on xulrunner-gnome-support), so generated error messages show icons
(see bug #404755).
If the changes are acceptable, it'd be nice to have the package updated
in testing when the 5 day wait is over.
Tha
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
Could you unblock cupsys 1.2.7-2 for Etch?
changelog:
cupsys (1.2.7-2) unstable; urgency=high
[ Kenshi Muto ]
* Applied upstream patches to fix some (include RC) bugs as dpatch style:
- STR2106: Raw PBM files did not print correctly
On Mon, Dec 18, 2006 at 02:19:53PM +0100, Bas Wijnen wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 17, 2006 at 02:55:09AM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > > I've just uploaded the package with the new name, and would like it to be
> > > pushed into Etch. When that happens, sdljump should be removed from it.
> > Well, bug
On Fri, Dec 29, 2006 at 01:41:17AM +0100, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> Sorry, but you don't make a soname bump just for the sake of
> applications ignoring function semantics.
Right. You also don't introduce regressions in an indeterminate number of
other packages during a freeze just because those
Le jeudi 28 décembre 2006 à 16:46 -0800, Thomas Bushnell BSG a écrit :
> What part of the freeze policy do you not understand? You uploaded two
> new upstream versions which fix no Debian bugs *after* the freeze.
Do you want me to report a Debian bug for each upstream issue? Or do you
really be
On Thu, Dec 28, 2006 at 04:18:01PM -0800, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
> 3) The change altered the syntax of the file by adding restrictions. It
> is therefore a non-backwards-compatible change to the ABI, and therefore
> it needs an so-name bump. No amount of adding this or that character
> will ch
On Fri, 2006-12-29 at 01:41 +0100, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> > 1) The release team has asked us not to upload changes which are not
> > destined for etch, and making gnucash work with the glib in unstable is
> > therefore a low priority;
>
> The glib in unstable is destined for etch, whether you l
Le jeudi 28 décembre 2006 à 16:18 -0800, Thomas Bushnell BSG a écrit :
> I don't think I asked for important bug fixes to be blocked outside
> etch. On the other hand, the upload of 2.12.5 did not fix any bugs,
> according to the changelog and the BTS.
According to the upstream changelog it fixes
On Fri, 2006-12-29 at 00:49 +0100, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> Le jeudi 28 décembre 2006 à 14:47 -0800, Thomas Bushnell BSG a écrit :
> > Package: glib2.0
> > Version: 2.12.5-3
> >
> > This version of glib (both 2.12.5-3 and 2.12.6-1) causes an important
> > regression in gnucash, and therefore shou
Le jeudi 28 décembre 2006 à 14:47 -0800, Thomas Bushnell BSG a écrit :
> Package: glib2.0
> Version: 2.12.5-3
>
> This version of glib (both 2.12.5-3 and 2.12.6-1) causes an important
> regression in gnucash, and therefore should not go into testing.
>
> See http://bugs.debian.org/404585.
What i
Package: glib2.0
Version: 2.12.5-3
This version of glib (both 2.12.5-3 and 2.12.6-1) causes an important
regression in gnucash, and therefore should not go into testing.
See http://bugs.debian.org/404585.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
On Thu, 2006-12-28 at 20:45 +0100, Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt wrote:
> As this may break more applications (earlier version broke locale
> parsing and gnomevfs), we should probably keep that code, reduce it to a
> warning for etch and then work out (together with upstream) how to solve
> this for the f
Hello again Andi:
I was able to discuss with upstream and he produced a new version which
does not depend on libtk-filedialog-perl. This would be horae_064-1. The
previously uploaded 063-3 is still fine so please let me know if you
prefer me to upload 064-1 for etch or just leave well-enoug
This version was the first one uploaded to unstable (on Dec 4, a week
before the freeze), and was living in experimental since Nov 29
(previous versions were in experimental since August). No reverse
depends, no open bugs, popcon 14.
--
Dmitry Borodaenko
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTE
On Thu, Dec 28, 2006 at 09:50:22PM +0100, Mike Hommey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 28, 2006 at 02:20:34AM -0800, Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > On Sun, Dec 24, 2006 at 01:40:37PM +0100, Mike Hommey wrote:
> >
> > > I see Alex has uploaded version 1.5.0.9 of icedove. W
Hi,
please unblock linux-modules-{contrib,nonfree}-2.6, all of the required
-source packages are already in testing.
--
Address:Daniel Baumann, Burgunderstrasse 3, CH-4562 Biberist
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Internet: http://people.panthera-systems.net/~daniel-baumann/
--
Daniel Baumann wrote:
> the same fix which was accepted in dwm here[0]
[0] http://lists.debian.org/debian-release/2006/12/msg00396.html
--
Address:Daniel Baumann, Burgunderstrasse 3, CH-4562 Biberist
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Internet: http://people.panthera-systems.net/~da
On Thursday 28 December 2006 13:40, martin f krafft wrote:
> mdadm 2.5.6-7 has been in unstable for two weeks and even though the
> diff between -6 and -7 is not as small as it should be, I feel
> confident that -7 can go into etch.
No objection from d-i PoV.
pgpPuldKJcprr.pgp
Description: PGP s
On Wednesday 27 December 2006 17:27, Davide Viti wrote:
> It'd be great if you could update ttf-dejavu (currently 2.11-1); it's
> the main font used by the graphical-installer and the latest releases
> contains a lot of fixes an improvements (see [1])
[snip no-op]
> version 2.13-1: current upstream
Hi,
the same fix which was accepted in dwm here[0] is also required in
dwm-tools. I uploaded dwm-tools 2-2 to t-p-u, please hint it into
testing, debdiff is attached, thanks.
--
Address:Daniel Baumann, Burgunderstrasse 3, CH-4562 Biberist
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Internet:
Hi,
see attached debdiff.
--
Address:Daniel Baumann, Burgunderstrasse 3, CH-4562 Biberist
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Internet: http://people.panthera-systems.net/~daniel-baumann/
diff -u rdiff-backup-1.1.5/debian/changelog rdiff-backup-1.1.5/debian/changelog
--- rdiff-backup
On Thu, Dec 28, 2006 at 02:20:34AM -0800, Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 24, 2006 at 01:40:37PM +0100, Mike Hommey wrote:
>
> > I see Alex has uploaded version 1.5.0.9 of icedove. What should we take
> > as a course of action for xulrunner, iceweasel and iceape ?
> > Shou
Pbbuttonsd 0.7.9-2 only drops the i386 packages which are unusable
due to missing hardware support. I filed a bug against ftp.debian.org
(#404406) to remove the binaries.
Gruesse,
--
Frank Lichtenheld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
www: http://www.djpig.de/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
w
Thomas Bushnell BSG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Wed, 2006-12-27 at 09:36 +, Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt wrote:
>> Thomas Bushnell BSG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>> And one seems perhaps to be responsible for a regression in gnucash
>>> (see #404585).
>> Yes, this is due to a stricter input v
http://zap.tartarus.org/~ds/playmidi_2.4debian-7.dsc
This adds only a Spanish templates translation (bug 404789). Would be nice to
have that in etch...
--
| Darren Salt| linux or ds at | nr. Ashington, | Toon
| RISC OS, Linux | youmustbejoking,demon,co,uk | Northumberland | Army
Russ Allbery <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I'm currently looking at another transition issue with the ssh-krb5
> package (it looks like it may disable gssapi-keyex because it adds the
> configuration option conditionally currently and ssh-krb5 may have
> attempted that unconditionally), so I *may*
On Wed, 2006-12-27 at 13:31 +0100, Andreas Barth wrote:
> You mean they changed the ABI without an soname change? That sounds
> really bad, yes.
They changed what counts as valid input in a certain case, perhaps
accidentally, perhaps on purpose.
Thomas
signature.asc
Description: This is a digi
On Wed, 2006-12-27 at 09:36 +, Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt wrote:
> Thomas Bushnell BSG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Why are new upstream releases being added to upstable of the glib2.0
> > package? We are in a freeze, I thought.
>
> Yes, but the new glib2.0 release is from upstream's stable se
On Thursday 28 December 2006 09:38, Wookey wrote:
> On 2006-12-26 17:44 +, Olly Betts wrote:
> > On Tue, Dec 26, 2006 at 12:28:47PM +0100, Luk Claes wrote:
[...]
> > > > * Reupload the package as something like 1.0.39.1-1 (or 1.0.39.1 and
> > > > fix the package to be non-native later when we a
In gmane.linux.debian.devel.release, you wrote:
> I upgraded a machine from sarge to etch and the process broke over ssh :(
>
> Here's the log:
>
> Transferring ownership of conffile /etc/init.d/ssh ...
> Transferring ownership of conffile /etc/pam.d/ssh ...
> dpkg: error processing
> /var/cache/a
Noah Meyerhans wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 28, 2006 at 06:11:28PM +0100, Martin Schulze wrote:
> > I upgraded a machine from sarge to etch and the process broke over ssh :(
>
> I believe this was fixed by 1:4.3p2-8, which should be allowed to enter
> etch ASAP.
Cool! Good to know that this problem is a
On Thu, Dec 28, 2006 at 06:11:28PM +0100, Martin Schulze wrote:
> I upgraded a machine from sarge to etch and the process broke over ssh :(
I believe this was fixed by 1:4.3p2-8, which should be allowed to enter
etch ASAP.
noah
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Martin Schulze <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I upgraded a machine from sarge to etch and the process broke over ssh :(
> Here's the log:
This is fixed in 1:4.3p2-8, currently in unstable. Several RC bugs have
been filed about it, so I expect that we'll want the new version to
migrate into etch.
I upgraded a machine from sarge to etch and the process broke over ssh :(
Here's the log:
Preconfiguring packages ...
(Reading database ... 100606 files and directories currently installed.)
Unpacking openssh-client (from .../openssh-client_1%3a4.3p2-7_i386.deb) ...
Transferring ownership of conf
I just updated discover-data in sid. It should be suitable for etch
as well, adding and updating the driver information for some PCI
devices. The changelog is included. Please consider including it in
etch. Perhaps it should wait 10 days, but I do not expect anything to
break while we wait.
T
On Thu, Dec 28, 2006 at 04:00:53AM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 23, 2006 at 08:03:29PM +0100, Andreas Barth wrote:
> > * Noah Meyerhans ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [061218 19:41]:
> > > Our options would seem to be to revise the release notes
> > > to no longer suggest upgrading aptitude befo
Wookey wrote:
> On 2006-12-26 17:44 +, Olly Betts wrote:
>> On Tue, Dec 26, 2006 at 12:28:47PM +0100, Luk Claes wrote:
>>> Olly Betts wrote:
The hppa binNMU was 1.0.39+b1.
Wookey uploaded 1.0.39-1, which has built for all architectures
including hppa, but the hppa upload was
On 2006-12-26 17:44 +, Olly Betts wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 26, 2006 at 12:28:47PM +0100, Luk Claes wrote:
> > Olly Betts wrote:
> > > The hppa binNMU was 1.0.39+b1.
> > >
> > > Wookey uploaded 1.0.39-1, which has built for all architectures
> > > including hppa, but the hppa upload was rejected be
Niko Tyni <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> request-tracker3.6 3.6.1-3 was unblocked on Dec 12 [1], but it's still
> not getting into etch. Could somebody please have a look?
Looks like aba removed the hint when cleaning up his hint file, even
though rt3.6 hadn't transitioned yet. I have readded that
* Fabio Tranchitella ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [061228 14:51]:
> zope-cps was removed from testing because it is incompatible with the
> current zope2.9 package and it is unmaintained upstream. The support
> packages for CPS are still in testing, and I ask to remove them as they are
> useless without z
Dear RMs,
zope-cps was removed from testing because it is incompatible with the
current zope2.9 package and it is unmaintained upstream. The support
packages for CPS are still in testing, and I ask to remove them as they are
useless without zope-cps. I already filed removal requests for CPS and i
* Steve Langasek ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [061228 13:16]:
> On Thu, Dec 14, 2006 at 05:12:29PM +, Rene Mayrhofer wrote:
> > Am Donnerstag, 14. Dezember 2006 17:01 schrieb Andreas Barth:
> > > gibraltar-bootcd was removed in March from Etch - I don't think it would
> > > be appropriate to allow it no
mdadm 2.5.6-7 has been in unstable for two weeks and even though the
diff between -6 and -7 is not as small as it should be, I feel
confident that -7 can go into etch.
Changelog:
http://packages.qa.debian.org/m/mdadm/news/20061213T144703Z.html
None of the changes affect the udeb or d-i.
I would
On Thu, Dec 14, 2006 at 05:12:29PM +, Rene Mayrhofer wrote:
> Am Donnerstag, 14. Dezember 2006 17:01 schrieb Andreas Barth:
> > gibraltar-bootcd was removed in March from Etch - I don't think it would
> > be appropriate to allow it now back in until there are *very* good
> > reasons for it.
> Y
On Sat, Dec 23, 2006 at 08:03:29PM +0100, Andreas Barth wrote:
> * Noah Meyerhans ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [061218 19:41]:
> > Our options would seem to be to revise the release notes
> > to no longer suggest upgrading aptitude before dist-upgrade, or
> > including an initrd-tools package that doesn't c
Daniel J. Priem wrote:
> Hello,
> i am requesting a clearance to upload a new version of kicad to fix
> #404783. the fix is attached as patch.
You don't need to ask permission to upload a revision that is targetted for
etch... Anyway, the changes look fine, though please send a migration request
a
On Sat, Dec 23, 2006 at 03:38:48PM +0100, Matthijs Mohlmann wrote:
> Steve Langasek wrote:
> > On Sat, Dec 09, 2006 at 09:48:38PM +0100, Matthijs Mohlmann wrote:
> >> I've finished a new upstream version of OpenLDAP. This has 3 binaries:
> >> slapd, libldap2.3-0 and ldap-utils. This version is mere
logcheck is a native package, so when i added some filters,
i produced a new upstream version. I'd like to see 1.2.52 in etch
and would like to reqest permission to upload it to unstable. I'll
get in touch with d-r again when it's time for a freeze exception.
Thanks,
--
Please do not send copies
Gerrit Pape wrote:
> Hi,
>
> twoftpd 1.21-4 in sid fixes important bug#400118, and I suggest to let
> this version into etch. The diff is minimal and straight forward.
>
> Additionally I suggest the socklog 2.1.0-7 package in sid to be included
> in etch, it fixes #401547 with the patch below, n
On Wed, Dec 27, 2006 at 10:45:58PM +, Steve McIntyre wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 27, 2006 at 10:53:59PM +0100, Jens Seidel wrote:
> >I noticed that recent DVD images do not contain Release.gpg files so
> >that APT warns all time about insecure packages.
> >An installation using the Debian Installer
Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
> please allow ltsp 0.99debian9 to migrate to etch.
>
> no additional bugs have been reported in the 4 days it has been in the
> archive.
>
> it fixes the following important bugs, adds or updates several
> translations, and includes a small documentation update. these ch
Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> Hi,
>
> As above. Changes are limited to:
> * adding debian/README.Debian, explaining a few bits about how to use
> the package;
> * editing debian/control for "documentation" (really, add two packages
> to Recommends:, as explained in README.Debian, and add a few lines
Norbert Tretkowski wrote:
> * Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt wrote:
>> Norbert Tretkowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>> Could you please unblock slrn 0.9.8.1pl1-23 which was uploaded a few
>>> days ago?
>> Unblocked.
>
> Thanks. Unfortunately, another upload was necessary to fix a build
> problem on mip
Hello,
i am requesting a clearance to upload a new version of kicad to fix
#404783. the fix is attached as patch.
please cc on answers
Regards
Daniel
Index: kicad-doc-en.install
===
--- kicad-doc-en.install (Revision 95)
+++ kicad-d
On Sun, Dec 24, 2006 at 01:40:37PM +0100, Mike Hommey wrote:
> I see Alex has uploaded version 1.5.0.9 of icedove. What should we take
> as a course of action for xulrunner, iceweasel and iceape ?
> Should we go with newer upstreams (note there's no official xulrunner
> release, but I fake them ta
On Mon, Dec 25, 2006 at 09:55:15PM +0100, Jan Wagner wrote:
> On Sunday 24 December 2006 00:31, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > This still does not respect certain local changes by the admin. Just
> > because the link in /etc/rc2.d has been left alone doesn't mean that the
> > symlinks for *all* the run
Hi,
twoftpd 1.21-4 in sid fixes important bug#400118, and I suggest to let
this version into etch. The diff is minimal and straight forward.
Additionally I suggest the socklog 2.1.0-7 package in sid to be included
in etch, it fixes #401547 with the patch below, no other changes.
Regards, Gerrit
Hi release team,
request-tracker3.6 3.6.1-3 was unblocked on Dec 12 [1], but it's still
not getting into etch. Could somebody please have a look?
[1] http://lists.debian.org/debian-release/2006/12/msg00426.html
Thanks for your excellent work,
--
Niko Tyni [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
T
Le mercredi 27 décembre 2006 à 23:55 +0100, Stefan Fritsch a écrit :
> Package: gconf2
> Version: 2.16.0-3
> Severity: important
> Tags: security
>
> A vulnerability has been reported in gconfd:
>
> The GConf daemon (gconfd) in GConf 2.14.0 creates temporary files
> under directories with names b
70 matches
Mail list logo
