Re: Security team's opinion

Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote: > On Tue, Dec 12, 2006 at 08:12:31PM +0100, Martin Schulze wrote: > > Andreas Barth wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > there are two issues where I would like to ask you to comment on: > > > > > > - mantis: We have two requests to allow it in. Is this ok from your > > > side

Re: please unblock manpages-fr 2.39.1-4 and manpages-fr-extra 20061210

* Thomas Huriaux ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [061212 22:48]: > As you may guess from package's names, they contain only translation > updates/fixes of documentation. approved. Cheers, Andi -- http://home.arcor.de/andreas-barth/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsub

Re: Please push gaim 1:2.0.0+beta5-8 into etch

* Ari Pollak ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [061212 18:05]: > I'd like to request gaim 1:2.0.0+beta5-8 to go into etch. It contains > quite a few RC and important bug fixes since -1, and overall is a vast > improvement over -1. Note that it does change one dependency from GnuTLS > to NSS for TLS support, due

Re: please also hint nvidia legacy

* Randall Donald ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [061212 20:36]: > Thanks for the hints on nvidia-graphics-drivers and modules. > > Now that 2.6.18-3 is in, please may I also have the same hinting for > nvidia-graphics-drivers-legacy > nvidia-graphics-legacy-modules-amd64 > and > nvidia-graphics-legacy-modul

Re: please unblock lltag_0.13.1-1

* Brice Goglin ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [061212 19:58]: > This is a new upstream release because I am the upstream and Debian > maintainer. So, as usual, I uploaded a new upstream 0.13.1 instead of > patching the Debian package currently in testing and uploading a 0.13-2. > I tried to make this new rele

Re: please transition jacal

* Thomas Bushnell BSG ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [061212 19:56]: > Can you please add a hint to transition jacal into etch? It was removed > because an RC bug didn't get fixed promptly by me, but I never saw the > bug report for some reason. As soon as it was removed, I uploaded a fix > the same day. I

Re: please ublock fail2ban

* Yaroslav Halchenko ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [061212 19:29]: > I didn't make it quite in time: testing has 0.7.4-3 whenever unstable > 0.7.5-2 - ie 1 upstream release away. > 0.7.5 upstream release is ia bugfix release though Just by the fact that you uploaded prior to freeze - the changes are too lar

Re: Please hint gnome-hearts-0.1.3-2 for migration to testing

* Sander Marechal ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [061213 07:50]: > Please hint gnome-hearts-0.1.3-2 for migration to testing. It fixes two > crash bugs and simplifies dependencies. Summary of the changes: approved. Cheers, Andi -- http://home.arcor.de/andreas-barth/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL

Re: Fixed ayttm: #402759

* Kartik Mistry ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [061213 07:17]: > ayttm is uploaded to unstable, > http://incoming.debian.org/ayttm_0.4.6+34-3_i386.changes approved. Cheers, Andi -- http://home.arcor.de/andreas-barth/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Troubl

Please hint gnome-hearts-0.1.3-2 for migration to testing

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello, Please hint gnome-hearts-0.1.3-2 for migration to testing. It fixes two crash bugs and simplifies dependencies. Summary of the changes: gnome-hearts (0.1.3-2) * Fixed the 01_gnome_cards_data.patch. Closes: #402715 gnome-hearts (0.1.3-1) *

Fixed ayttm: #402759

Dear Team, ayttm is uploaded to unstable, http://incoming.debian.org/ayttm_0.4.6+34-3_i386.changes This fixed: #402759 important (earlier marked as RC). I will be glad if this hits Etch. Thanks to Daniel for sponsoring. Thanks. -- Regards, --

Bug#402855: xchat: (generated?) config file line causes BadAlloc crash

Package: xchat Version: 2.6.8-0.2 Severiy: important The following line was found in my .xchat/xchat.conf: gui_win_height = 65528 It causes the following message to stderr after selecting a server to which to connect: |The program 'xchat' received an X Window System error. |This probably reflec

Re: gnustep-base 1.13.0-7: fixes #402558 (really, this time)

(P.S. please Cc: me, as I am not subscribed to d-release.) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

gnustep-base 1.13.0-7: fixes #402558 (really, this time)

As per the previous discussion, I have renamed the pl binary in gnustep-base-runtime, to avoid the conflict with tendra, in order to fix bug #402558. I have checked that the new name is not contained in any other package (at least not in sid, i386). Since this bug is a policy violation, I wou

bad debhelper code ignoring errors; packages not updated

lintian.d.o isn't updated yet to include the test, but lintian 1.23.16 and later includes a test for debhelper-generated maintscript code of the form: foo || exit 0 which was intended to be foo || exit $? but included too few s. This is a notable problem with some current testing packages

Re: Please unblock geneweb 4.10-25

> I see that you lost a db_purge that was in the old version, but isn't > called anymore in the new postinst. Also, there is a changelog.old (copy It is called in the postrm. IIRC, not in the postinst. The old version has no db_purge in postinst, but the postrm had one.which I found to be red

Re: Heimdal Upload

> "Andreas" == Andreas Barth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Andreas> Thanks, approved. -7 had a single character typo, and was broken for new installations, so I uploaded -8. See: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=401258 -- Brian May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE

Re: Bug#402804: openssh-client: Needs to conflict with old ssh-krb5; conffile ownership transfer failure

Thank you for checking on these! Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > The options GSSUseSessionCCache/GSSAPIUseSessionCredCache (synonyms) and > GSSAPICleanupCreds (a synonym for GSSAPICleanupCredentials) were in > ssh-krb5 but aren't in current openssh. Russ, Sam, what should I do > about

Re: Bug#401192: bin-NMU for dsniff

On Tue, Dec 05, 2006 at 09:55:10AM +0100, Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt wrote: > Please bin-NMU dsniff: > dsniff_2.4b1+debian-15, rebuild for libnids1.21 (#401192), 1, alpha, amd64, > arm, hppa, i386, ia64, m68k, mipsel, mips, powerpc, s390, sparc > This should fix the bug. BinNMUs scheduled; closing

Re: please also hint nvidia legacy

Steve is the one who hinted the current drivers, urgent-ing nvidia-graphics-drivers at 8 days. I agree with this and think this would also be safe for the legacy drivers. There is an issue with nvidia-kernel[-legacy]-2.6-amd64, which is arch: all rather than amd64. This makes it uninstallable o

Re: Bug#402804: openssh-client: Needs to conflict with old ssh-krb5; conffile ownership transfer failure

(CCing Sam for extra Kerberos wisdom; see down near the end) (CCing debian-release because this just got into etch. Damnit) On Tue, Dec 12, 2006 at 07:35:02PM -0500, Adam C Powell IV wrote: > On Tue, 2006-12-12 at 13:10 -0800, Russ Allbery wrote: > > Similarly, I don't understand this either. Th

Re: Please remove openssh-krb5

Moritz Muehlenhoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > [Ccing Russ for confirmation.] > Now that the openssh transition package has entered Etch, the time is > ripe to remove openssh-krb5. Please hint it out. This should happen semi-automatically, shouldn't it? The ssh-krb5 binary package has been ta

Please remove openssh-krb5

[Ccing Russ for confirmation.] Now that the openssh transition package has entered Etch, the time is ripe to remove openssh-krb5. Please hint it out. Cheers, Moritz -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

please accept the new roundup package (1.2.1-5)

Hello, the new package closes bug #402826. I can change it to 1.2.1-6 to make it formally do so via its changelog, if desired. Best, --Toni++ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Etch frozen!

Nicolas Boullis wrote: > Hi, > > On Tue, Dec 12, 2006 at 01:47:09AM +0100, Luk Claes wrote: >>> Now, a question about a package of mine: will you allow isync 1.0.3-2 >>> in? >> Yes, unblock hint added. > > Thanks! :-) > > >> Updates that only include RC bug fixes, translation or documentation

Re: please let mplayer into testing

* Moritz Muehlenhoff ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [061212 22:39]: > A Mennucc wrote: > > PS: actually, I personally do not agree to this bug being tagged > > "serious". We all know that dynamical linking is the recommended way > > to go (as stated in d-policy); but currently neither mplayer is apt to > >

Re: auctex update

> AB == Andreas Barth [2006-12-12] AB> Actually, on seeing these changes, I considered to refuse the AB> changes. On a second thought, I'm still approving the changes, as AB> they were uploaded just in time. But this is not going to repeat. That's your call, I do not dispute. However, it w

mantis: not supportable by the security team

Package: mantis Severity: serious As per http://release.debian.org/etch_rc_policy.txt - 5a, I am opening this RC bug against mantis to prevent it from releasing until which time the security team is convinced that it is a package that can be reasonably supported. See the discussion thread here:

Re: ruledispatch, turbogears and turbojson removals from testing (was: Re: ruledispatch REMOVED from testing)

Ping on the request below? =) Em Thu, 7 Dec 2006 10:18:04 -0200 Gustavo Noronha Silva <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escreveu: > [not subscribed, please CC] > > Hello, > > ruledispatch has been removed from testing and, I believe, because of > that turbogears and turbojson went out also; I uploaded a fix

Re: Security team's opinion

On Tue, Dec 12, 2006 at 08:12:31PM +0100, Martin Schulze wrote: > Andreas Barth wrote: > > Hi, > > > > there are two issues where I would like to ask you to comment on: > > > > - mantis: We have two requests to allow it in. Is this ok from your > > side? (No bug id, sorry - in case that not, co

please unblock manpages-fr 2.39.1-4 and manpages-fr-extra 20061210

Hi, As you may guess from package's names, they contain only translation updates/fixes of documentation. manpages-fr 2.39.1-4: [ Nicolas François ] * Do not translate parameters' name (`stream' in fwide.3). * accept(2): The O_ASYNC flag is not inherited from the listening socket. *

Re: please let mplayer into testing

A Mennucc wrote: > Brief summary of bug: MPlayer contains an embedded copy of FFmpeg > (indeed, they are developed by ~the same people); Aur=E9lien G=C9R=D4ME a= > nd > Moritz Muehlenhoff ask that the mplayer package be dynamically linked to > the libraries in the Debian package ffmpeg; they cons

Re: digikam 0.8.2 for etch, the next Debian release!? (due to exiv2 0.12)

Le mardi 12 décembre 2006 20:35, vous avez écrit : > Hi exiv2 developers, > > the debian-release managers do not accept a library > transition from exiv2 0.10 to 0.12 as etch is already > frozen: > > > http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-kde-extras/2006-December/00219 >3.html http://lis

Re: Etch frozen!

Hi, On Tue, Dec 12, 2006 at 01:47:09AM +0100, Luk Claes wrote: > > > Now, a question about a package of mine: will you allow isync 1.0.3-2 > > in? > > Yes, unblock hint added. Thanks! :-) > Updates that only include RC bug fixes, translation or documentation updates > are fine. But I will h

please, let op-panel back into testing.

Hi, op-panel was removed from testing due some destar/op-panel rc bugs. they were fixed in destar 0.2.0-3 and op-panel 0.26.dfsg-5 packages. The op-panel is used by destar, so, it'd would be nice if you let op-panel back into testing. Best regards, Santiago signature.asc Description: Esta pa

Re: How to handle filename conflict "aleph" (Packages aleph, tetex-bin, texlive-bin)?

Frank Küster wrote: > severity 389163 serious > thanks > > Dear release team, > > I just noticed > > , Etch RC policy: > | > | > | Packages must not install programs in the default PATH with > | different functionality with the same file name, even if they > | Conflict:. > `

Re: How to handle filename conflict "aleph" (Packages aleph, tetex-bin, texlive-bin)?

On Tue, 2006-12-12 at 21:20 +0100, Frank Küster wrote: > We've got a problem here, since all three packages are in testing, > provide /usr/bin/aleph, and conflict with each other (or rather, the > *tex* packages conflict with aleph). Eek. > > The right solution to this would be to package the "n

Re: Fwd: Bug#401660: [Pkg-kde-extras] Bug#401660: Library upgrade for exiv2

On Tuesday 12 December 2006 17:06, Andreas Barth wrote: > So, I think it is better to revert digikam now. (Yes, this is one of the > times where I'm actually a bit too nice to really say hard "No way to > upgrade the library" - I would rather prefer to have all the updates in, > but I know that it

How to handle filename conflict "aleph" (Packages aleph, tetex-bin, texlive-bin)?

severity 389163 serious thanks Dear release team, I just noticed , Etch RC policy: | | | Packages must not install programs in the default PATH with | different functionality with the same file name, even if they | Conflict:. ` We've got a problem here, since all three packa

Re: Request for an "etch-ignore carte blanche" for alternative texlive dependencies

Hi, I've been asked in private mail why we want to do this mass bug filing at all. I paste here the relevant parts of my answer: [why not wait until after etch] We won't push that hard before etch is released, but it doesn't hurt to fix those bugs now if a package gets an upload for etch, anywa

Re: Security team's opinion

Andreas Barth escreveu: Hi, there are two issues where I would like to ask you to comment on: - mantis: We have two requests to allow it in. Is this ok from your side? (No bug id, sorry - in case that not, could you please open an RC bug on mantis?) mantis have one security bug #402802.

Re: Remaining sysvinit issues and updating the etch version

* Petter Reinholdtsen ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [061211 10:27]: > [Steve Langasek] > > Does this mean you think sysvinit -36 in unstable is not quite ready > > for release, and that we should be looking at t-p-u for a solution > > to bug #330592? Or should we be considering the unstable version > > for

Re: tasksel 2.58

On 12/12/06, Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: "Gustavo Franco" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > FYI, tasksel 2.58 (sid) is critical for the Debian Desktop initiative. > Please consider push it into Etch. It was already pushed in by aba. Thank you for the update Marc. regards, --

Please allow dejagnu 1.4.4.cvs20060709-3

This fixes an aggravating permissions problem; the entire diff to the version in testing is below. Thanks in advance. Index: debian/changelog === --- debian/changelog(revision 182) +++ debian/changelog(revision 199) @@ -1,3 +

digikam 0.8.2 for etch, the next Debian release!? (due to exiv2 0.12)

Hi exiv2 developers, the debian-release managers do not accept a library transition from exiv2 0.10 to 0.12 as etch is already frozen: http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-kde-extras/2006-December/002193.html http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/12/msg4.html Digi

Re: libapache-mod-log-sql

Thomas Goirand wrote: > Maybe libapache-mod-log-sql only then (which was my first idea). That > one is ok, right? Yes, this package is fine, but it was not part of any stable release yet, and it's imho too new in Debian to be considered. I think, release-team will not grant an exception here. But

please also hint nvidia legacy

Thanks for the hints on nvidia-graphics-drivers and modules. Now that 2.6.18-3 is in, please may I also have the same hinting for nvidia-graphics-drivers-legacy nvidia-graphics-legacy-modules-amd64 and nvidia-graphics-legacy-modules-i386 Kind Regards, randy -- -

Re: Please unblock cyrus-imapd-2.2

"Benjamin Seidenberg" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Please unblock cyrus-imapd-2.2 2.2.13-10. Done. Marc -- BOFH #183: filesystem not big enough for Jumbo Kernel Patch pgpfHRxDIXL0w.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: please ublock jsmath (3.3g-3)

Yaroslav Halchenko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > The only changes were added debconf i18n translations (ru,fr,de) > closing bugs (#402269,#399436,#399434) Unblocked. Marc -- BOFH #445: Browser's cookie is corrupted -- someone's been nibbling on it. pgpT7ZQ6bOBVi.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: please unblock imagezoom

Yaroslav Halchenko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > 0.2.7-3 closes release relevant bug (400168) of migrating over to iceweasel. > Depends were corrected to include iceweasel. Done. Marc -- BOFH #61: not approved by the FCC pgpQIPvdCcIxV.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: tasksel 2.58

"Gustavo Franco" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > FYI, tasksel 2.58 (sid) is critical for the Debian Desktop initiative. > Please consider push it into Etch. It was already pushed in by aba. Marc -- BOFH #179: multicasts on broken packets pgp8rkWltLBDa.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: Security team's opinion

Andreas Barth wrote: > Hi, > > there are two issues where I would like to ask you to comment on: > > - mantis: We have two requests to allow it in. Is this ok from your > side? (No bug id, sorry - in case that not, could you please open an > RC bug on mantis?) Why should the Security Team op

Security team's opinion

Hi, there are two issues where I would like to ask you to comment on: - mantis: We have two requests to allow it in. Is this ok from your side? (No bug id, sorry - in case that not, could you please open an RC bug on mantis?) - mplayer: Bug #395252: Please depend on ffmpeg binary packages

please unblock lltag_0.13.1-1

Hi, I would like lltag_0.13.1-1 to be unblocked. lltag is a command-line audio file tagger and parser written in perl. Nobody depends on it, and its dependencies are not changing with this new release. This is a new upstream release because I am the upstream and Debian maintainer. So, as usual, I

please transition jacal

Can you please add a hint to transition jacal into etch? It was removed because an RC bug didn't get fixed promptly by me, but I never saw the bug report for some reason. As soon as it was removed, I uploaded a fix the same day. It has now passed the two day mark in which it would have been tran

Re: tasksel 2.58

On 12/11/06, Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I'm still hoping to see 2.58 get into etch, because #386244 is a really *nasty* bug, even though it won't effect enough users to be RC. I also still hope to release a tasksel 2.59, which would probably be limited to task changes (some of which ar

Re: libapache-mod-log-sql

Daniel Baumann wrote: > Thomas Goirand wrote: >> Just sending a quick mail to ask if it was possible to upload this >> package (libapache-mod-log-sql) from Unstable to Testing. I've been >> using it in production since quite a long time now, and it seems to work >> rather well. I'd be very happy if

Please unblock cyrus-imapd-2.2

Please unblock cyrus-imapd-2.2 2.2.13-10. It fixes an important bug involving SASL interaction and contains only bug fixes (the rest minor). The patch disabled was a recent upstream patch that adds a feature not present in the upstream 2.2.13, it was disabled after causing problems. Changelog: cy

please ublock jsmath (3.3g-3)

The only changes were added debconf i18n translations (ru,fr,de) closing bugs (#402269,#399436,#399434) -- .-. =-- /v\ = Keep in touch// \\ (yoh@|www.)onerussian.com Yaroslav Halch

Re: please hint xfce4-session into testing

On 12/12/06, Andreas Barth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: * Yves-Alexis Perez ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [061211 23:27]: > xfce4-session 4.3.99.2 is part of Xfce 4.4rc2, which has been more or > less uploaded to unstable, with some delay (some rc2 packages have > reached testing, some are only in unstable a

please unblock imagezoom

Dear Release Team, 0.2.7-3 closes release relevant bug (400168) of migrating over to iceweasel. Depends were corrected to include iceweasel. -- .-. =-- /v\ = Keep in touch// \\ (

please ublock fail2ban

Dear Release Team, I didn't make it quite in time: testing has 0.7.4-3 whenever unstable 0.7.5-2 - ie 1 upstream release away. 0.7.5 upstream release is ia bugfix release though * closes 2 debian bugs (Closes: 400162, 400278) which can be encountered by many users but none of which is higher th

Re: please hint policyd-weight 0.1.14-beta-3 for etch

On Tuesday 12 December 2006 13:59, Andreas Barth wrote: > approved. Thanks, Jan. -- Never write mail to <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, you have been warned! -BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK- Version: 3.1 GIT d-- s+: a- C+++ UL P+ L+++ E- W+++ N+++ o++ K++ w--- O M V- PS PE Y++ PGP++ t-- 5 X R tv- b+ DI-

Re: Request for an "etch-ignore carte blanche" for alternative texlive dependencies

On Tue, 2006-12-12 at 08:38 +0100, Frank Küster wrote: > I would like to start a mass bug filing (not yet discussed on -devel, > severity non-RC) on packages that depend on teTeX without an alternative > TeXlive dependency. This is mainly targetted at lenny, but I would also > like to encourage pe

Re: Fwd: Bug#401660: [Pkg-kde-extras] Bug#401660: Library upgrade for exiv2

* Mark Purcell ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [061211 23:28]: > Could I obtain some direction from the release team? > > Will you allow the exiv2 library transition to go forward or would you like > me > to revert the version of digikam in unstable/ etch? > > Or is there some other option available? Sorr

Re: Please hint wl-beta into etch

On December 12, 2006 at 5:15PM +0100, he (at ftwca.de) wrote: > >>> Could you please allow wl-beta_2.15.4+0.20061015-2 with the 2 line > >>> patch to fix an IMAP connection bug for testing-proposed-updates > >>> to replace wl-beta_2.15.4+0.20061015-1? > >> Could you describe the bug and show the d

Please push gaim 1:2.0.0+beta5-8 into etch

Hello RM team, I'd like to request gaim 1:2.0.0+beta5-8 to go into etch. It contains quite a few RC and important bug fixes since -1, and overall is a vast improvement over -1. Note that it does change one dependency from GnuTLS to NSS for TLS support, due to the fact that upstream says NSS suppor

Re: New Trac upstream release candidate

Andreas Barth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > * Andreas Barth ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [061211 11:54]: >> So, in case you really want to have even a little chance: Show the >> unified diff. As said in our mail to debian-devel-announce. But the time >> for new upstream versions for Etch is really past now

Re: Freeze of asterisk-prompt-de

* Mario Joußen ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [061212 17:21]: > could you please integrate asterisk-prompt-de 2.0-1 into Etch? It fixes > the important bug #355575, which leads to an unusable voice box application. approved. Cheers, Andi -- http://home.arcor.de/andreas-barth/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email

Freeze of asterisk-prompt-de

Hi, could you please integrate asterisk-prompt-de 2.0-1 into Etch? It fixes the important bug #355575, which leads to an unusable voice box application. Cheers, Mario -- .''`. Mario Joußen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> : :' : proud Debian developer, administrator, and user `. `'` `- Debian - when

Re: Please hint wl-beta into etch

Tatsuya Kinoshita <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On December 11, 2006 at 6:40PM +0100, he (at ftwca.de) wrote: >>> Could you please allow wl-beta_2.15.4+0.20061015-2 with the 2 line >>> patch to fix an IMAP connection bug for testing-proposed-updates >>> to replace wl-beta_2.15.4+0.20061015-1? >> Co

Re: request-tracker3.6 (was: Etch frozen!)

* Toni Mueller ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [061212 17:07]: > > Hello, > > On Mon, 11.12.2006 at 11:08:50 +0100, Andreas Barth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > - If your package needs to be updated for Etch, and the version in > > unstable doesn't contain extraneous changes (e.g, the version is the >

Re: binNMU for mcabber and hint into testing

Mario Iseli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Mon, Dec 11, 2006 at 03:07:59PM +0100, Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt wrote: >> The diff is quite big, and I don't see important bugs closed in the >> changelog (haven't looked at the rest). So, no, unless you provide a >> better to reason to hint it in, I will

request-tracker3.6 (was: Etch frozen!)

Hello, On Mon, 11.12.2006 at 11:08:50 +0100, Andreas Barth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > - If your package needs to be updated for Etch, and the version in > unstable doesn't contain extraneous changes (e.g, the version is the > same between testing and unstable), please upload your fix

Re: XDG Menu Spec compliance

Josselin Mouette <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Le mardi 12 décembre 2006 à 09:17 +0100, Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt a écrit: >> gnome-menu looks OK-ish (though I don't understand the shlibs bump) >> gnome-panel, bug-buddy and eel2 look fine. > The shlibs bump was added to automatically increase the requ

Re: New Trac upstream release candidate

* Andreas Barth ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [061211 11:54]: > So, in case you really want to have even a little chance: Show the > unified diff. As said in our mail to debian-devel-announce. But the time > for new upstream versions for Etch is really past now, with only *very* > *very* limited exceptions,

Re: please unblock wmforkplop

Torsten Werner wrote: > The package missed the freeze by one day and the version in unstable > fixes bug #398526. It has no open bugs other than this one. unblock hint added. Cheers Luk -- Luk Claes - http://people.debian.org/~luk - GPG key 1024D/9B7C328D Fingerprint: D5AF 25FB 316B 53BB 08E

Re: Please unblock bottlerocket (0.05b3-8)

Kevin Coyner wrote: > Could you please unblock bottlerocket (0.05b3-8). > > It needs to wait for the 10-day limit, but it includes language > translations that would be nice to have in the next release. unblock hint added. Cheers Luk -- Luk Claes - http://people.debian.org/~luk - GPG key 1024

please unblock wmforkplop

The package missed the freeze by one day and the version in unstable fixes bug #398526. It has no open bugs other than this one. Cheers, Torsten -- blog: http://twerner.blogspot.com/ homepage: http://www.twerner42.de/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscrib

Re: [gsynaptics] request to ensure inclusion

Osamu Aoki wrote: > Hi releasse team, (I am traveling) Hi Osamu >* Fixed typo s/Threashold/Threshold/ for synclient. (closes: Bug#401637) > Please make sure its inclusion to the release. unblock hint added, though has to wait for succesfull build on sparc. Cheers Luk -- Luk Claes - http

Please unblock bottlerocket (0.05b3-8)

Could you please unblock bottlerocket (0.05b3-8). It needs to wait for the 10-day limit, but it includes language translations that would be nice to have in the next release. From Changelog: * Add German, Czech and French translations (de.po, cs.po and fr.po). Closes: #396434, #393534, #3825

Re: updated package: roundup 1.2.1-5 (was: Etch frozen!)

Hello Andi, On Tue, 12.12.2006 at 12:18:44 +0100, Andreas Barth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Freeze does really mean: No new changes unless really required. you meman, I should consider opening an RC bug against the package? You also didn't answer the questions about the other packages. Best

[gsynaptics] request to ensure inclusion

Hi releasse team, (I am traveling) I realize gsynaptics is still not updated. Since * Fixed typo s/Threashold/Threshold/ for synclient. (closes: Bug#401637) is a reasonable fix which helps its user, slow autobuilder should not prevent its release.

Etch/testing missing PAE kernel for xen; important for compatibility

Hi list! http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=390862 Is there anything that could be done with this, at this (late) point? If we can't do anything anymore, then etch will be released with non-pae xen kernel, that cannot be used with fedora/rhel xen kernels.. which means you cannot us

Re: libapache-mod-log-sql

Thomas Goirand wrote: > Just sending a quick mail to ask if it was possible to upload this > package (libapache-mod-log-sql) from Unstable to Testing. I've been > using it in production since quite a long time now, and it seems to work > rather well. I'd be very happy if it could be included in the

libapache-mod-log-sql

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello, Just sending a quick mail to ask if it was possible to upload this package (libapache-mod-log-sql) from Unstable to Testing. I've been using it in production since quite a long time now, and it seems to work rather well. I'd be very happy if i

Re: lightspeed

Hi On Tue, Dec 12, 2006 at 01:29:24PM +0100, Luk Claes wrote: > Ola Lundqvist wrote: > > Hi > > Hi Ola > > > A workaround for a (probable) problem in fontconfig has been > > uploaded which closes a serious bug (makes package unuseable). > > s/closes/opens/ I guess? My upload is a workaround fo

Re: kernel-patch-openvz

Hi On Tue, Dec 12, 2006 at 12:06:47PM +0100, Andreas Barth wrote: > * Ola Lundqvist ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [061211 20:48]: > > I would like you to update kernel-patch-openvz as I (today) > > updated it in order to make the kernel compile on ia64 with ia32 > > bit compatibility flag on. > > > > If yo

Re: Accept dwm 2.1-2

Andreas Barth wrote: > I assume this patch is also included in unstable? If so, please upload. It is taken from dwm 2.6 which was accepted on 2006-12-07, yes. Uploaded now, thanks. -- Address:Daniel Baumann, Burgunderstrasse 3, CH-4562 Biberist Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Internet

Re: Accept dwm 2.1-2

* Daniel Baumann ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [061212 14:20]: > Andreas Barth wrote: > > Can you please include the diff in the mail? > > Sure. I assume this patch is also included in unstable? If so, please upload. Cheers, Andi -- http://home.arcor.de/andreas-barth/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [E

Re: updated package: roundup 1.2.1-5 (was: Etch frozen!)

Hello Andi, On Tue, 12.12.2006 at 12:18:44 +0100, Andreas Barth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Sorry, but that are way too many changes after freeze. well, the 1.2.1-4 package version is much more broken, and it did take so much time to clean up for a reason (and some RL factors I could not influ

Re: Accept tinyerp-client 3.4.2-2

Same here:a -- Address:Daniel Baumann, Burgunderstrasse 3, CH-4562 Biberist Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Internet: http://people.panthera-systems.net/~daniel-baumann/ diff -u tinyerp-client-3.4.2/debian/patches/00list tinyerp-client-3.4.2/debian/patches/00list --- tinyerp-clie

Re: Accept dwm 2.1-2

Andreas Barth wrote: > Can you please include the diff in the mail? Sure. -- Address:Daniel Baumann, Burgunderstrasse 3, CH-4562 Biberist Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Internet: http://people.panthera-systems.net/~daniel-baumann/ diff -u dwm-2.1/debian/patches/00list dwm-2.1/de

Re: Accept dwm 2.1-2

* Daniel Baumann ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [061212 12:16]: > Please upload dwm 2.1-2 to testing. > > Note that this bug was never reported in the BTS, because I always > uploaded dwm upstream fixes faster than anybody could open a bug report. > However, the bug is serious especially because UTF is the d

Re: please unblock libpng 1.2.15~beta5-0

Hi, As I'm no longer the maintainer, I don't have any say to what happens to this package, but my advice, based on my painful experience with libpng, would be to *not* unblock it now. Releasing with a beta version that hasn't been widely tested is a dead end. Even without the "beta" flag, there ha

Re: please hint policyd-weight 0.1.14-beta-3 for etch

* Jan Wagner ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [061212 11:53]: > Hi, > > please consider upgrade to 0.1.14-beta-3 as it solves the bug #402314 and > only > sets shell to /bin/false. > > policyd-weight (0.1.14-beta-3) unstable; urgency=medium > >* fixed attributes of system user (Closes: #402314). > >

Re: update for mediawiki

* Romain Beauxis ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [061212 11:33]: > Hi release managers ! > > Together with the mediawiki packaging team, we have prepared an update for > mediawiki which solves two bugs, namely #401808 and #399886. > > This update is only a change in the debian/control file, it does no

Re: Please unblock denyhosts 2.6-1

* Marco Nenciarini ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [061212 13:19]: > please unblock denyhosts 2.6-1. done. Cheers, Andi -- http://home.arcor.de/andreas-barth/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: please unblock dvipng

* Torsten Werner ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [061212 13:13]: > it is now 11 days old and has no bugs. The changes are: > > [ Varun Hiremath ] > * New upstream release (Closes: #401151, #398181, #366946) > * New maintainer (Closes: #391195) > * debian/control: Build-Depend on debhelper 5 > * debi

Re: please unblock rpm 4.4.1-14

Aníbal Monsalve Salazar wrote: > Hello RMs, Hi > Please unblock rpm 4.4.1-14. > > rpm 4.4.1-12 and -13 introduced in etch the wrong patches to deal > with FTBFS on non-linux that don't have selinux. rpm 4.4.1-14 doesn't seem to fix #399750, so no unblock hint added... Cheers Luk -- Luk Clae

  1   2   >