Re: Bug#397129: apt: depends on lower priority package

2006-11-06 Thread Christian Perrier
> Comments, abjections? s/abj/obj Given the meaning of words starting with "abject" in French, I prefer being rather precise, here..:) signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: xapian packages may need hinting

2006-11-06 Thread Steve Langasek
On Tue, Nov 07, 2006 at 02:02:14AM +, Olly Betts wrote: > It looks like the migration to testing of the latest xapian packages is > now only blocked by recursive dependencies: > http://bjorn.haxx.se/debian/testing.pl?package=xapian-core;expand=1 > If this needs manual intervention to resolve,

xapian packages may need hinting

2006-11-06 Thread Olly Betts
It looks like the migration to testing of the latest xapian packages is now only blocked by recursive dependencies: http://bjorn.haxx.se/debian/testing.pl?package=xapian-core;expand=1 If this needs manual intervention to resolve, the source packages involved are: xapian-core xapian-omega xapian-

Re: Please allow base-files 4 in testing

2006-11-06 Thread Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt
Santiago Vila <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > base-files (4) unstable; urgency=low > . >* Changed issue, issue.net and debian_version to read "4.0". >* Changed PATHs in default /etc/profile to not contain /usr/bin/X11, > as this is no longer needed by the X packages in etch (Closes: #38

Re: Bug#397129: apt: depends on lower priority package

2006-11-06 Thread Christian Perrier
Quoting Andreas Barth ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > * Christian Perrier ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [061106 09:09]: > > Release managers, do you have a comment on that issue? Bumping the > > priority of debian-archive-keyring to "important", with an ftpmaster > > override, seems the most appropriate solution here

Please allow base-files 4 in testing

2006-11-06 Thread Santiago Vila
This is the changelog: base-files (4) unstable; urgency=low . * Changed issue, issue.net and debian_version to read "4.0". * Changed PATHs in default /etc/profile to not contain /usr/bin/X11, as this is no longer needed by the X packages in etch (Closes: #388586). and these are the up

Re: Bug#397129: apt: depends on lower priority package

2006-11-06 Thread Andreas Barth
* Christian Perrier ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [061106 09:09]: > Release managers, do you have a comment on that issue? Bumping the > priority of debian-archive-keyring to "important", with an ftpmaster > override, seems the most appropriate solution here. Fully agreed. Removing the dependency is a non-o

Re: Please rebuild kwin-style-crystal on ARM

2006-11-06 Thread Sune Vuorela
On 2006-11-05, Kari Pahula <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > kwin-style-crystal depends on kdebase-dev, which currently depends on > kdelibs4-dev (>= 4:3.5.5), which was unsatisfiable during the last > build attempt on ARM. > > Version 4:3.5.5a.dfsg.1-3 of kdelibs4-dev is currently in installed > state

Re: Who sponsored the NMU of clustalw?

2006-11-06 Thread Fabio Tranchitella
Dear RMs, could you please add a hint to remove the s390 binary package of clustalw from testing? It prevents my NMU (uploaded on 2006-07-19) to reach testing, and if the binary won't be built in a timely fashion, it will exclude clustalw from the etch release. Even if it is non-free, clustalw h

Re: Bin-NMU debootstrap?

2006-11-06 Thread Steve Langasek
On Sun, Nov 05, 2006 at 11:20:41PM -0500, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > I've verified that rebuilding debootstrap on MIPS fixes #397091, which > presumably is blocking successful d-i on MIPS. Would a bin-NMU be > appropriate for this? Sounds good to me; scheduled. Thanks, -- Steve Langasek