On Fri, Aug 18, 2006 at 10:00:27AM +0200, BALLABIO GERARDO wrote:
> I disagree. If there's non-free material in main [...]
This is not a discussion list. Please don't hold constitutional debates
here, they are off-topic.
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free
Sven Luther wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 17, 2006 at 10:07:42AM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> Maks -
>>
>> On Thu, Aug 17, 2006 at 06:05:30PM +0200, maximilian attems wrote:
>> > > Something about [bug #242866] seems broken, however,
>> > > because RC-buggy linux-2.6 packages keep making it into
>>
On Wed, Aug 16, 2006 at 12:16:55PM +0200, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> Can someone pleaes review and approve colo 1.22-1. It fixes a FTBFS
> bug.
Hinted.
Thanks,
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can
On Tue, Aug 15, 2006 at 10:45:09AM +0200, Luk Claes wrote:
> Can someone please schedule binNMUs for:
> wormux_0.7.3-1, Rebuild against libxml++2.6-2, 1, alpha, amd64, arm,
> hppa, i386, ia64, m68k, mips, mipsel, powerpc, s390, sparc
> gnomoradio_0.15.1-5, Rebuild against libxml++2.6-2, 2, alpha,
On Fri, Aug 18, 2006 at 12:54:39PM +0200, Robert Millan wrote:
> Any chance gcj >= 4.1.1-11j1 can make it into etch?
gcj-4.1 hasn't been frozen yet, but whether this gets into etch depends on
when it's uploaded.
> Would be very nice to have gcjwebplugin-4.1. We'll have no browser java
> suppor
Hi!
Any chance gcj >= 4.1.1-11j1 can make it into etch?
Would be very nice to have gcjwebplugin-4.1. We'll have no browser java support
otherwise.
--
Robert Millan
My spam trap is [EMAIL PROTECTED] Note: this address is only intended for
spam harvesters. Writing to it will get you added to
> No, what allowed sarge to go out the door with DFSG violations was an
unambigous GR by a majority of the debian developers who decided to
include
those non-free firmware (and GFDL docs, and some random fonts, and ...),
into
sarge even though they didn't quite meet the DFSG.
>
> That vote is not v
7 matches
Mail list logo
