On Tue, Aug 15, 2006 at 10:45:09AM +0200, Luk Claes wrote: > Can someone please schedule binNMUs for: > wormux_0.7.3-1, Rebuild against libxml++2.6-2, 1, alpha, amd64, arm, > hppa, i386, ia64, m68k, mips, mipsel, powerpc, s390, sparc > gnomoradio_0.15.1-5, Rebuild against libxml++2.6-2, 2, alpha, amd64, > arm, hppa, i386, ia64, m68k, mips, mipsel, powerpc, s390, sparc > synfigstudio_0.61.05-3, Rebuild against libxml++2.6-2, 1, alpha, amd64, > hppa, i386, ia64, mips, mipsel, powerpc, s390, sparc > bakery2.3_2.3.11-2, Rebuild against libxml++2.6-2, 1, alpha, amd64, arm, > hppa, i386, ia64, m68k, mips, mipsel, powerpc, s390, sparc > buffy_0.11.2-1, Rebuild against libxml++2.6-2, 1, alpha, amd64, arm, > hppa, i386, ia64, mips, mipsel, powerpc, s390, sparc > gobby_0.3.1-2, Rebuild against libxml++2.6-2, 1, alpha, amd64, hppa, > i386, ia64, mips, mipsel, powerpc, s390, sparc
On Thu, Aug 17, 2006 at 01:05:09PM +0200, Loïc Minier wrote: > libxml++2.6-1c2a was renamed to libxml++2.6-2, the following source > packages would need a bin NMU: > buffy wormux gobby synfigstudio bakery2.3 gnomoradio > Concerning wormux, I'm not sure how it's control is updated from > control.in, but the current debian/control seemed to permit bin NMUs. Done. -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
