On Tue, May 24, 2005 at 06:02:38PM +0200, Samuel Mimram wrote:
> Philipp Hartmann wrote:
> >The recent NMU of Samuel (see #309089) to link GKrellM against GNUTLS
> >introduced a bug (#310471), for which I already filed a patch.
> >
> >Since the GKrellM package version 2.2.5-1.2 is now hinted into S
severity 279965 serious
tags 279965 sarge-ignore
thanks
Hi Paul,
On Tue, May 24, 2005 at 10:24:05PM +0100, Paul Martin wrote:
> I've been persuaded that this is an RC bug in logrotate (it changes
> behaviour from what woody did and can potentially cause data loss to
> happen if a script doesn't
On Tue, May 24, 2005 at 02:45:02PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
> On Tuesday 24 May 2005 04:37, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > The one nice feature of this list that I'd be disappointed to miss is
> > that it does let users know about possible replacements for obsoleted
> > packages.
> Well, that is my main
Just looking at the flood of "please consider for testing" messages on
this list, all of which need to be read, checked over, and a (possibly
unpopular) decision made.
I don't have a package to get in or out of testing, but thanks anyway to the
release managers and their assistants for what must
On Sat, May 21, 2005 at 05:33:14AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> Fair enough. I've approved this version of hal to go in, and I'll just take
> the filesystem hit on my ext3 keychain. ;)
Just checked the progress of this, according to the update excuses hal_tpu
still needs approvel by RM.. Did so
Enter tempting world of Teen Playground!
Inside you will find horny untouched virgins, real first timers.
They are so shy and innocent, that only big sum of money can awake their fucking instincts!
But when this girlies feel huge cock inside them, they become real sexual
furies!
Join now, and y
On Tue, May 24, 2005 at 06:47:45PM -0500, Ming Hua wrote:
> Please consider pushing scim 1.0.2-3 to sarge, thanks.
Approved
Gruesse,
--
Frank Lichtenheld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
www: http://www.djpig.de/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Conta
On Tue, May 24, 2005 at 11:03:37AM -0400, Stephen Gran wrote:
> Please accept hdparm 6.1-2 for sarge. debdiff output below:
Approved.
Thanks,
--
Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
(Please cc: me as I am not subscribed to debian-release.)
Dear release managers,
On Thu, May 19, 2005 at 02:35:25PM -0500, minghua wrote:
> On Wed, May 18, 2005 at 04:09:43PM +0200, Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
> > The changes look generally acceptable but you should hurry with finding
> > a sponsor.
Hello translators,
A lot of work has been done on the Release Notes over the last week. There
is still one more fairly major update and one or two minor ones planned,
but that should be it. That last major update is somewhat complex and is
therefore taking more time than was hoped.
A number of
Hi,
I'd like to ask for xosview and ultrapoint's newest versions to be
included in Sarge. Why?
xosview: Versions 1.8.2-3 and 1.8.2-4 closes three normal and one
minor bugs (#130633, #183695, #281565, #306715 - Two documentation
bugs, one reliability bug, one scalability bug). The packages wer
On Tue, May 24, 2005 at 04:46:30PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > - All packages failed to upgrade (pre-depends problem)
> > - Upgrade failed.
> > Further Comments/Problems:
> > Output from /usr/bin/script:
> > E: Internal Error, Couldn't configure a pre-depend
> > Ack! Something bad
On Mon, May 23, 2005 at 12:17:34AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > Yes, please upload to t-p-u and let us know once it's uploaded so we can
> > review it.
>
> It seems this upload hasn't happened yet. I guess there's still some
> question about how to fix 309848? I've looked at this package, an
On Tue, May 24, 2005 at 10:23:11AM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
> Roger Leigh wrote:
> > I didn't see a mail about this in the archives. This bug has now been
> > fixed and uploaded by the maintainer, and needs approval for sarge.
> Steve already has an entry for this in his hints file, but it's
> com
Hi,
Please consider current unstable dictionaries-common (0.25.12) for sarge. All
changes are limited to the debconf po translations.
A summary follows:
* [0.25.10] Accepted in unstable: 2005-05-12
- Russian [ru] debconf templates translation updated,
(closes: #307679)
* [0.25.11] Acce
I've been persuaded that this is an RC bug in logrotate (it changes
behaviour from what woody did and can potentially cause data loss to
happen if a script doesn't run).
I've bumped its severity to "grave". There are three possible fixes:
* Documentation of the problem. (Least preferred option)
On Mon, May 23, 2005 at 05:42:26PM -0400, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> Glibc -22 has finally been built and uploaded for all architectures
> (special thanks to Ryan for kicking it along). Every change in the
> package should be suitable for sarge; it fixes one bug, which is not
> tagged as RC, but v
On Tue, May 24, 2005 at 03:44:58PM -0400, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
> On Tue, May 24, 2005 at 07:01:52PM +0200, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote:
> >
> > Indeed, unfortunately, since then, a new version was uploaded to
> > unstable without the udeb's yet synced :-(.
> >
> > Therefore, a no-changes upload t
severity 310406 normal
severity 310407 normal
tags 310406 patch
tags 310407 patch
thanks
Stefan Hinz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, of the MySQL AB Documentation Team,
wrote in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>[1] and <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>[2]
as documented in this bug with regards to the MySQL manual:
| What's not mention
On Tue, May 24, 2005 at 07:01:52PM +0200, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote:
>
> Indeed, unfortunately, since then, a new version was uploaded to
> unstable without the udeb's yet synced :-(.
>
> Therefore, a no-changes upload to testing is needed for 1.37-2, best
> named 1.37-2sarge1. Will you perform
A sourceful upload was made of lcrash to trigger a rebuild against
binutils-dev 2.15-6 to get security fix for elf integer overflow bug
in the bfd archive library. Please consider allowing this new build of
lcrash (7.0.0.pre.cvs.20050322-3) with no source changes into testing
to solve this secu
On Tue, May 24, 2005 at 08:27:02PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
> Personally however, I see an important distinction between debian-volatile
> and the other two sites.
>
> Debian-volatile will be very restrictive and aims to guarantee
> compatibility with upgrades to new releases of Debian. It will a
On Tue, May 24, 2005 at 08:03:50PM +0200, Marcin Owsiany wrote:
> An interdiff from -2 is attached.
This time it is.
Marcin
--
Marcin Owsiany <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://marcin.owsiany.pl/
GnuPG: 1024D/60F41216 FE67 DA2D 0ACA FC5E 3F75 D6F6 3A0D 8AA0 60F4 1216
diff -u ekg-1.5+200504
Since aba gave an OK on IRC, I uploaded -3 with all fixes mentioned in
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
An interdiff from -2 is attached.
Marcin
--
Marcin Owsiany <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://marcin.owsiany.pl/
GnuPG: 1024D/60F41216 FE67 DA2D 0ACA FC5E 3F75 D6F6 3A0D 8AA0 60F4 1216
--
To UNSUB
On Tuesday 24 May 2005 19:23, Adrian von Bidder wrote:
> In response to the recent volatile announcement, I posted to d-release
> and saw only now that debian-doc is given as the relevant mailing list
> at the top of the release note...
>
> I propose mentioning backports.org and apt-get.org in the
Quoting Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
On Mon, May 23, 2005 at 09:33:33AM +0200, Luigi Gangitano wrote:
Just which was the right queue. Shall I retain the same version (2.0.5)
with an epoch or upload the new upstream version?
If the problem is that you have to remove material from the ori
On Mon, May 02, 2005 at 12:44:26AM -0400, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
> On Mon, May 02, 2005 at 05:04:42AM +0200, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > In order to get debian-installer and normal tools & sources in sync for
> > sarge, which is a requirement, I'm going to upload 1.35-8 as
> > 1.35-
Hi,
Philipp Hartmann wrote:
The recent NMU of Samuel (see #309089) to link GKrellM against GNUTLS
introduced a bug (#310471), for which I already filed a patch.
Since the GKrellM package version 2.2.5-1.2 is now hinted into Sarge, I
would like to know how this should be handled.
The crashes wi
martin f krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> also sprach Russ Allbery <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005.05.24.0344 +0200]:
>> libcwd is licensed under the QPL, about which there was an extended
>> debian-legal thread a while back and non-free seemed to be the
>> consensus (he says warily, not particularl
On Tue, May 24, 2005 at 10:23:11AM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
> Roger Leigh wrote:
> > I didn't see a mail about this in the archives. This bug has now been
> > fixed and uploaded by the maintainer, and needs approval for sarge.
>
> Steve already has an entry for this in his hints file, but it's
> c
Hello
To release management. Can you accept a fix for this?
Regards,
// Ola
On Tue, May 24, 2005 at 01:36:44PM +0200, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
> Package: util-vserver
> Version: 0.30.204-5sarge1
>
> Hello,
>
> the postinst script for util-vserver has bashism, which causes errors if
> /bi
Hey babie. It is of course Sexy J, from the web personals place. I've been
checking you out all over the place and I just wanted to say hola. I want you
to check out my site and read all about me too. I just cant wait to hear from
you again soon hottie. TTYS,
Cutey July
www.tpwa.correctspeling
Hi!
Upstream has recently fixed a few bugs in libgadu in one batch. I have
split them into two patchsets.
Some of them (attached as 2005-05-24-rc-fix-onlyRC.patch) are RC in my
opinion, in that they:
- fix a DoS condition (missing check for 0 return value from read())
- fix a mistake of setting
Hello all,
Please accept hdparm 6.1-2 for sarge. debdiff output below:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/Debian/hdparm$ debdiff hdparm_6.1-1.dsc hdparm_6.1-2.dsc
diff -u hdparm-6.1/debian/hdparm.default hdparm-6.1/debian/hdparm.default
--- hdparm-6.1/debian/hdparm.default
+++ hdparm-6.1/debian/hdparm.default
On Mon, May 23, 2005 at 10:27:50PM +, Kevin O. Morris wrote:
> Package: upgrade-reports
>
> Archive date: Sun May 22 20:00:01 UTC 2005
> Upgrade date: Mon May 23 00:18:59 UTC 2005
> uname -a: Linux montypython.tingfod.org 2.4.16-686 #1 Wed Nov 28
> 09:27:17 EST 2001 i686 unknown
> Method:
Roger Leigh wrote:
> I didn't see a mail about this in the archives. This bug has now been
> fixed and uploaded by the maintainer, and needs approval for sarge.
Steve already has an entry for this in his hints file, but it's
commented out for some reason.
--
see shy jo
signature.asc
Descripti
* Rene Engelhard ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [050522 21:05]:
> Rene Engelhard wrote:
> > Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
> > > On Sun, May 22, 2005 at 01:26:46AM +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote:
> > > > > Also, I couldn't locate the place where the upstream maintainer
> > > > > changed,
> > > > > nor the place where
On Mon, May 23, 2005 at 10:39:23PM +0200, Marc Haber wrote:
> Dear release team, pretty please consider approving exim4 4.50-6, or
> indicate what kind of information might be missing to speed up exim4
> 4.50-6's approval into sarge.
Approved. Sorry for the delay.
--
Colin Watson
* Peter Palfrader ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [050524 01:40]:
> I just uploaded an NMU for viewcvs that fixes #303756.
> It's in incoming right now.
approved.
Cheers,
Andi
--
http://home.arcor.de/andreas-barth/
PGP 1024/89FB5CE5 DC F1 85 6D A6 45 9C 0F 3B BE F1 D0 C5 D1 D9 0C
--
To UNSUBSCRI
Hello,
This source package is included on sid without bugs for a long time
and it's new version is very improved if compared with the current
testing one. Please consider to approve it for sarge.
Thanks,
--
O T A V I OS A L V A D O R
-
E-
I didn't see a mail about this in the archives. This bug has now been
fixed and uploaded by the maintainer, and needs approval for sarge.
Regards,
Roger
--
Roger Leigh
Printing on GNU/Linux? http://gimp-print.sourceforge.net/
GPG Public Key: 0x25BFB848. Pleas
Hi Matt,
On Tue, May 24, 2005 at 05:17:20AM -0400, Matt Hope wrote:
> Format: 1.7
> Date: Sat, 21 May 2005 22:02:22 +1000
> Source: fluxbox
> Binary: fluxbox
> Architecture: source i386
> Version: 0.9.11-1sarge0
> Distribution: testing-proposed-updates
> Urgency: high
> Maintainer: Matt Hope <[EMA
On Tuesday 24 May 2005 04:37, Steve Langasek wrote:
> The one nice feature of this list that I'd be disappointed to miss is
> that it does let users know about possible replacements for obsoleted
> packages.
Well, that is my main problem with the lists. The lists we currently have
available for S
Quoting Adrian von Bidder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
On Tuesday 24 May 2005 10.31, Andreas Barth wrote:
volatile is also mentioned in the release notes.
[...]
With volatile being mentioned in the release notes (and it being a
debian.net service, thus not-entirely-official), a clarifying note should
On Mon, May 23, 2005 at 03:41:36PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
> Previously mentioned fix for important severity bug.
> Format: 1.7
> Date: Mon, 23 May 2005 13:16:52 -0400
> Source: analog
> Binary: analog
> Architecture: source i386
> Version: 2:5.32-14
> Distribution: testing
> Urgency: low
> Mainta
* Adeodato Simó ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [050524 11:25]:
> please allow kdenetwork 3.3.2-5 into sarge, it fixes the recently
> discovered "kopete links against local copy of libgadu3" problem, and
> it was agreed on IRC that it was best to get this fixed for sarge.
>
> Interdiff attached. The f
* Joerg Jaspert ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [050522 00:15]:
> Ive just uploaded 1.0-8 of package dak.
> It fixes a bunch of bugs, including 3 translations.
Approved.
Cheers,
Andi
--
http://home.arcor.de/andreas-barth/
PGP 1024/89FB5CE5 DC F1 85 6D A6 45 9C 0F 3B BE F1 D0 C5 D1 D9 0C
--
To UN
The changes fixes some annoying or harming problems and IMHO this version
should appear in sarge release.
TIA.
diff -Nru libnss-db-2.2-6.2/debian/changelog
libnss-db-2.2-6.3/debian/changelog
--- libnss-db-2.2-6.2/debian/changelog 2005-05-24 12:16:55 +0200
+++ libnss-db-2.2-6.3/debian/changelog
On Mon, May 23, 2005 at 08:25:17PM +0200, Mattia Dongili wrote:
> Uploaded and waiting to build. Thanks again for your time.
Approved
Gruesse,
--
Frank Lichtenheld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
www: http://www.djpig.de/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trou
Hello,
please allow kdenetwork 3.3.2-5 into sarge, it fixes the recently
discovered "kopete links against local copy of libgadu3" problem, and
it was agreed on IRC that it was best to get this fixed for sarge.
Interdiff attached. The fix should work for every arch, but
nevertheless I wi
On Tuesday 24 May 2005 10.31, Andreas Barth wrote:
> volatile is also mentioned in the release notes.
[...]
With volatile being mentioned in the release notes (and it being a
debian.net service, thus not-entirely-official), a clarifying note should
imho be added to explain what the difference is
> Unless the maintainer speaks up and explains why we should ship a library
> that isn't used by anything in sarge, I still plan to remove it.
No problem.
--
Roger Leigh
Printing on GNU/Linux? http://gimp-print.sourceforge.net/
GPG Public Key: 0x25BFB848. Plea
also sprach Russ Allbery <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005.05.24.0344 +0200]:
> libcwd is licensed under the QPL, about which there was an extended
> debian-legal thread a while back and non-free seemed to be the consensus
> (he says warily, not particularly liking trying to summarize
> debian-legal).
I d
also sprach Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005.05.24.0331 +0200]:
> Does this mean that the libcwd in testing is also non-free, and is
> in the wrong section?
Well, it's QPL, and I was never convinced that it was non-free. Some
people on -legal seemed to think so, and I was indifferent at th
54 matches
Mail list logo
