* Rene Engelhard ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [050522 21:05]: > Rene Engelhard wrote: > > Frank Lichtenheld wrote: > > > On Sun, May 22, 2005 at 01:26:46AM +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote: > > > > > Also, I couldn't locate the place where the upstream maintainer > > > > > changed, > > > > > nor the place where MAINT_SEARCH was disabled. (And the diff is a bit > > > > > verbose due to changing the path of the diffs - well, I don't mind too > > > > > much for _this_ part.) > > > > > > > > It's in upstreams tarball whose diff isn't visible because this is a > > > > dbs-using package :). If you really want, you can get a 0.72c -> 0.72d > > > > diff, > > > > though... > > > > > > Yes, please. > > > > Attached. Please note that the changes in the html files do not affect > > anything since those files are not packaged. And if they were, they > > would have been rebuilt during the build anyway to fix paths in them. > > Oops. 310K attachement. I should have checked the size. Anyway, It seems > it didn't get got through; if it did sorry. Here's the patch again on the web: > > http://people.debian.org/~rene/muttprint-072c-072d.diff
approved. But - this packages shows a very nice example why I'm _very_ unhappy with scripts like cdbs or so - they just break debdiff. Cheers, Andi -- http://home.arcor.de/andreas-barth/ PGP 1024/89FB5CE5 DC F1 85 6D A6 45 9C 0F 3B BE F1 D0 C5 D1 D9 0C -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
