please approve mgetty 1.1.33-2

Hi, please approve this new mgetty upload for sarge. It fixes two nasty issues (with low-risk changes): * Previously, only root could set fax jobs to specific users - now also lp and daemon, which is necessary for integrating into a printing system * For accounting, also the user id is logged.

Re: Pushing gtk+2.0 (2.6.4-2)

On Thu, May 12, 2005 at 09:12:49PM -0300, Gustavo Noronha Silva wrote: > Oi denovo, > Em Qua, 2005-05-11 às 14:35 -0300, Gustavo Noronha Silva escreveu: > [...] > > All of the changes you mentioned were not intended and only happened > > because of missing or wrong commits on our SVN. My fault, I

Re: Re-adding package 'symlinks' to Sarge ?

Hi Bill, On Thu, May 12, 2005 at 11:04:55PM +0200, Bill Allombert wrote: > I have NMUed 'symlinks' to fix bug #273338 (the patch is in the > bug log). It is now rebuilt on all architectures. > Would you consider reincluding this package in sarge, given it was > in woody ? Do you actively use thi

Re: Bug#308777: marked as done (python2.3-subversion: leaves byte-compiled files after removal in /usr/lib/python2.3/site-packages/{lib,}svn/)

Hi David, On Thu, May 12, 2005 at 11:03:08PM -0700, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote: > Format: 1.7 > Date: Thu, 12 May 2005 21:04:56 -0700 > Source: subversion > Binary: libsvn-core-perl libapache2-svn libsvn0 python2.3-subversion > subversion-tools libsvn0-dev subversion > Architecture: source

Re: your mail

On Thu, May 12, 2005 at 02:45:19PM +0200, Stefano Melchior <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I notice that the binary package went from 12MB in size to 772KB. Is this > > expected? (I'm happy to be able to save the space in the archive, as long > > as it doesn't mean something is missing. :) > I a

Re: Please accept linphone into sarge (was: libosip2 and libosip2-3)

On Thu, May 12, 2005 at 02:14:03PM +0200, Samuel Mimram wrote: > Steve Langasek wrote: > >Nevertheless, since when all is said and done the only thing that kept > >libosip2 2.2.0 out of sarge was a spurious upload to change the maintainer > >field, and siproxd missed the freeze by one day, I'm (pro

Re: Please approve libflash to enter in Sarge

Hi Iwamatsu, On Thu, May 12, 2005 at 09:05:18PM +0900, Nobuhiro Iwamatsu wrote: > Please approve source package libflash version 0.4.11-5 in sarge. > because 0.4.11-3 has had a releasecritical bug, which was fixed > in 0.4.11-4 ( #282062, #283408, #290801, #295133 ). As libflash-mozplugin has be

Preparation of the next stable Debian GNU/Linux update (II)

Preparation of the next stable Debian GNU/Linux update == An up-to-date version is at . I am preparing the next revision of the current stable Debian distribution (woody) and will frequently send reports so

Re: New autofs in sid, please push to testing

Hi Steinar, On Wed, May 11, 2005 at 01:51:13PM +0200, Steinar H. Gunderson wrote: > I've uploaded autofs 4.1.3+4.1.4beta2-8 to sid, which fixes (to the best of > my knowledge -- I can't reproduce the problems myself) two important bugs, > and contains no other changes. vorlon promised me a freeze

Re: Accepted phpbb2 2.0.13+1-6 (all source)

On Thu, May 12, 2005 at 04:47:54PM -0500, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote: > Please approve phpbb2/2.0.13+1-6 > This is a security release, fixing #308282 (cross site scripting in > bbcode), and the only other change is a minor tweak in the dependencies > to counter unintended effects of the php4 dumm

Re: please accept ratpoison-1.3.0-7 into testing

On Thu, May 12, 2005 at 02:41:20PM -0700, Jonathan Walther wrote: > Minor revision 7 fixed a bug that made ratpoison unusable for KDE and > GNOME users. Please consider it for inclusion; that was the only change > made to the package. Approved. Cheers, -- Steve Langasek postmodern programmer

Re: swfdec0.3-0.3.4-3

Hi David, On Thu, May 12, 2005 at 06:59:03PM -0700, David Schleef wrote: > I just fixed bug #308266, which causes the swfdec mozilla plugin to > Just Not Work on big endian architectures (or really, any X Visual > that doesn't happen to match mine.) The new version should really > get into sarge.

swfdec0.3-0.3.4-3

I just fixed bug #308266, which causes the swfdec mozilla plugin to Just Not Work on big endian architectures (or really, any X Visual that doesn't happen to match mine.) The new version should really get into sarge. dave... swfdec0.3 (0.3.4-3) unstable; urgency=high * Add a colorspace ele

Please consider quantlib_0.3.9 (and -ruby,-python,-doc) for testing

Hi, My QuantLib packages in testing are in an inconsistent state: Name testing unstable -- quantlib 0.3.8.rc.20050412-1 0.3.9-1 quantlib-python 0.3.8-2 0.3.9-1

Re: RFFE: portmap 5-11

Anibal Monsalve Salazar wrote: > >Also, unlike the comment in the file claims, manual modificatons are > >lost as soon as the package is reconfigured (or upgraded, I think): > > I'm afraid that is not the case. > > >[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/home/joey>cat /etc/portmap.conf > ># Portmap configuration fi

Re: Accepted kdirstat 2.4.0-3 (i386 source)

On Wed, May 11, 2005 at 09:34:08AM -0400, Mike Schacht wrote: > Format: 1.7 > Date: Mon, 9 May 2005 17:42:51 -0600 > Source: kdirstat > Binary: kdirstat > Architecture: source i386 > Version: 2.4.0-3 > Distribution: testing-proposed-updates > Urgency: low > Maintainer: Mike Schacht <[EMAIL PROTECT

Re: perl can be in an unusable state during upgrade

tags 278495 patch thanks Hi folks, I've prepared an NMU for this bug with the attached patch (should look familiar), and will be uploading shortly. -release, please consider doc-base 0.7.18-0.1 for sarge. Thanks, -- Steve Langasek postmodern programmer diff -Nru /var/tmp/01YrgvV4q7/doc-base-0.

Re: [Fwd: bacula_1.36.3-1_i386.changes ACCEPTED]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Steve Langasek wrote: >> The only other option i have is to backport all of the changes to >> 1.36.2... > > > Well, no; the option would be to backport the *release-critical* > fixes to 1.36.2, and upload just those fixes to > testing-proposed-updates

Re: Pushing gtk+2.0 (2.6.4-2)

Oi denovo, Em Qua, 2005-05-11 Ãs 14:35 -0300, Gustavo Noronha Silva escreveu: [...] > All of the changes you mentioned were not intended and only happened > because of missing or wrong commits on our SVN. My fault, I should have > rechecked the diff's deeper than simply svn diff'ing. > > I'm rig

Re: skkdic fix

On Fri, May 13, 2005 at 01:55:07AM +0200, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote: > On Sun, May 08, 2005 at 11:15:21AM +0900, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Package: skkdic > > Version: 20040323-1 > > Severity: serious > > The following syntax in which there is debian/rules is dependent on bash. > > > rm >

skkdic fix

On Sun, May 08, 2005 at 11:15:21AM +0900, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Package: skkdic > Version: 20040323-1 > Severity: serious > > The following syntax in which there is debian/rules is dependent on bash. > > rm > > debian/skkdic-extra/usr/share/skk/SKK-JISYO.{L,wrong.annotated,china_taiwan.h

Re: Bug#308777: python2.3-subversion: leaves byte-compiled files after removal in /usr/lib/python2.3/site-packages/{lib,}svn/

severity 308777 serious thanks On Thu, May 12, 2005 at 03:45:26PM +0200, Adeodato Simó wrote: > * Frédéric Bothamy [Thu, 12 May 2005 11:56:01 +0200]: > > IAIUI this is against Python Policy 2.5 (Module Bytecompilation) (I > > don't know if the Python Policy is authoritative for reporting RC bugs,

Re: [Fwd: bacula_1.36.3-1_i386.changes ACCEPTED]

On Thu, May 12, 2005 at 01:17:20PM +0200, José Luis Tallón wrote: > Steve Langasek wrote: > > On Thu, May 12, 2005 at 02:24:53AM +0200, José Luis Tallón wrote: > >> This is to request the new version of Bacula to be included in > >> Sarge. This version fixes several important bugs, most > >> impo

Re: mrtg package problems

On Tue, May 10, 2005 at 06:07:44PM +0200, Laszlo Boszormenyi wrote: > The mrtg and related packages seems to be orphaned. Shiju p. Nair is > last done an upload at 2004 April the 6th. Since then, there are only > NMUs, like it was NMUed constantly since 2002. The package is a bit > bad shape, would

Re: wmaker: restarts on window resize

On Thu, May 12, 2005 at 12:53:57AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: > The NMU will be uploaded shortly. > > -release: please approve wmaker_0.91.0-7.1 for sarge, fixing this RC bug. Approved. Gruesse, -- Frank Lichtenheld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> www: http://www.djpig.de/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to

Re: Push request: balsa_2.3.0-2sarge1 and tsclient_0.132-5

On Fri, May 13, 2005 at 04:10:50AM +1000, Andrew Lau wrote: > balsa (2.3.0-2sarge1) testing; urgency=medium > * Backport fixes from Balsa 2.3.1 and 2.3.2 for Debian "Sarge" > + [debian/patches/01_extern_addrbook.patch]: > - Re-enables external address books in the UI. > (closes

Re: One more squid upload. Directions?

On Thu, May 12, 2005 at 12:34:50PM +0200, Luigi Gangitano wrote: > What is the RM-preferred way to do this? Since sid will need these too, > I was thinking of uploading to sid with urgency high and ask for > allowance, but don't want to mess things without your advice. Just upload to unstable (and

Re: please accept zope2.7 2.7.5-2 into sarge

[BTW, your MFT header seems broken] On Thu, May 12, 2005 at 12:42:00PM +0200, A Mennucc wrote: > I just uploaded zope2.7 2.7.5-2 into unstable > > this version fixes > bug 305854 a minor problem when running tests > bug 307687 bashism in /etc/init.d/zope2.7 Approved. (Sidenote: If you really

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Re: autofs 4.1.4 in sarge]

On Wed, May 11, 2005 at 03:01:11PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: >> 1) Let 4.1.4beta2-8 go into sarge, fixing one important bug (#304245) but >>letting others (#297359) pass. (Looks like my Closes: line in 4.1.4beta2-8 >>was too broad; I'll reopen #297359 later today.) >> 2) Try to backport

Re: RFFE: portmap 5-11

On Thu, May 12, 2005 at 12:09:37PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote: >Anibal Monsalve Salazar wrote: >>The version of portmap in sarge is 5-9. Please consider portmap 5-11 >>for sarge. >> >>Version: 5-11 >>Closes: 305505 306929 >>Changes: >> portmap (5-11) unstable; urgency=high >> . >> * Changed all refe

Re: Please hint fonty-rg 0.5 into sarge

On Thu, May 12, 2005 at 11:16:07AM -0400, Simon Law wrote: > Radovan recently uploaded fonty-rg 0.5 into sid. This fixes RC bug > 308246, which is a file conflict between fonty-rg and uniconf-tools. > This upload also contains some minor typographical changes that don't > affect the functionalit

Re: Accepted phpbb2 2.0.13+1-6 (all source)

Please approve phpbb2/2.0.13+1-6 This is a security release, fixing #308282 (cross site scripting in bbcode), and the only other change is a minor tweak in the dependencies to counter unintended effects of the php4 dummy package. This package is installed on forums.debian.net and works as expecte

please accept ratpoison-1.3.0-7 into testing

Minor revision 7 fixed a bug that made ratpoison unusable for KDE and GNOME users. Please consider it for inclusion; that was the only change made to the package. Jonathan -- It's not true unless it makes you laugh, but you don't understand it until it makes

Re-adding package 'symlinks' to Sarge ?

Dear release team, I have NMUed 'symlinks' to fix bug #273338 (the patch is in the bug log). It is now rebuilt on all architectures. Would you consider reincluding this package in sarge, given it was in woody ? Thanks for your time, -- Bill. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Imagine a large red swirl here.

Upgrading to postgresql bug fix release 7.4.8

Hi Debian release team! I'm currently fixing some important (and other) bugs in the postgresql package, which I'd like to see in Sarge. I'll mail the details when the package is ready, but so far I wanted to ask whether you would accept the new usptream version 7.4.8 in Sarge? 7.4.8 only contains

Re: RFFE: portmap 5-11

On Thu, May 12, 2005 at 12:09:37PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote: > Anibal Monsalve Salazar wrote: > >* Fixed "SIGCHLD handler doesn't preserve errno", closes: #306929. > > Patch by Alexander Achenbach <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>. > Not important or RC is it? This fix looks like an application of a fi

Re: Bug#249642: [Call For Help] cdrdao: Please support the amd64/sarge release

On Thu, May 12, 2005 at 09:05:33PM +0200, Andreas Jochens wrote: > On 05-May-12 19:53, Andrew Suffield wrote: > > On Thu, May 12, 2005 at 06:01:14PM +0200, Andreas Jochens wrote: > > > there have been several request from amd64 users which would like to > > > use cdrdao. > > > > > > Please reconsi

Re: Bug#249642: [Call For Help] cdrdao: Please support the amd64/sarge release

Hello, thank you for your reply to my mail. On 05-May-12 19:53, Andrew Suffield wrote: > On Thu, May 12, 2005 at 06:01:14PM +0200, Andreas Jochens wrote: > > there have been several request from amd64 users which would like to > > use cdrdao. > > > > Please reconsider applying the simple patch w

Push request: balsa_2.3.0-2sarge1 and tsclient_0.132-5

Hi everyone, balsa (2.3.0-2sarge1) testing; urgency=medium * Backport fixes from Balsa 2.3.1 and 2.3.2 for Debian "Sarge" + [debian/patches/01_extern_addrbook.patch]: - Re-enables external address books in the UI. (closes: #306553) - Fixes segfaults caused by accessing t

Re: RFFE: portmap 5-11

Anibal Monsalve Salazar wrote: > The version of portmap in sarge is 5-9. Please consider portmap 5-11 > for sarge. > > Version: 5-11 > Closes: 305505 306929 > Changes: > portmap (5-11) unstable; urgency=high > . >* Changed all references of '/etc/default/portmap' to '/etc/portmap.conf' >

Re: phpdoc & sarge

On Thu, May 12, 2005 at 06:22:22PM +0300, Lior Kaplan wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > Hi, > > While doing a new version for phpdoc, I found out that upstream change > the license to OPL on Tue Jun 10 03:43:48 2003 (info from > http://cvs.php.net/phpdoc/LICENSE). > >

phpdoc & sarge

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi, While doing a new version for phpdoc, I found out that upstream change the license to OPL on Tue Jun 10 03:43:48 2003 (info from http://cvs.php.net/phpdoc/LICENSE). According to http://www.debian.org/legal/licenses/dls-005-opl OPL isn't DFSG comp

Please hint fonty-rg 0.5 into sarge

Radovan recently uploaded fonty-rg 0.5 into sid. This fixes RC bug 308246, which is a file conflict between fonty-rg and uniconf-tools. This upload also contains some minor typographical changes that don't affect the functionality of fonty-rg. Thanks, Simon signature.asc Description: Digital

Re: Bug#308777: python2.3-subversion: leaves byte-compiled files after removal in /usr/lib/python2.3/site-packages/{lib,}svn/

* Adeodato Simó <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-05-12 15:45] : > * Frédéric Bothamy [Thu, 12 May 2005 11:56:01 +0200]: > > > IAIUI this is against Python Policy 2.5 (Module Bytecompilation) (I > > don't know if the Python Policy is authoritative for reporting RC bugs, > > hence the normal severity). >

Re: Accepted lesstif1-1 1:0.93.94-11.3 (i386 source all)

Matej Vela wrote: > On Tue, May 10, 2005 at 08:43:51PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote: > [...] > > This seems broken: > > > > - sprintf(buf, "compress > \"%s\"", filename); > > - if (!(mdata->stream.file = popen(buf, "w"))) > > + snprintf(buf, sizeof(buf), "compress > \"%s\""

Re: Bug#308777: python2.3-subversion: leaves byte-compiled files after removal in /usr/lib/python2.3/site-packages/{lib,}svn/

* Frédéric Bothamy [Thu, 12 May 2005 11:56:01 +0200]: > IAIUI this is against Python Policy 2.5 (Module Bytecompilation) (I > don't know if the Python Policy is authoritative for reporting RC bugs, > hence the normal severity). As can be read in the list of "Release Critical Issues for Sarge" [

Re: your mail

> I notice that the binary package went from 12MB in size to 772KB. Is this > expected? (I'm happy to be able to save the space in the archive, as long > as it doesn't mean something is missing. :) aspell-it now uses affixes which are supported by aspell0.6.x (already in Sarge): this means that

please accept zope2.7 2.7.5-2 into sarge

hi I just uploaded zope2.7 2.7.5-2 into unstable this version fixes bug 305854 a minor problem when running tests bug 307687 bashism in /etc/init.d/zope2.7 it "doesn't contain extraneous changes", so I uploaded to unstable; this version 2.7.5-2 has been tested and it works fine; unfortunatel

Re: your mail

nsor: Rc auto Zuritel. Prezzo tagliato Più garanzie. Fai un preventivo gratuito, prova subito! Clicca qui: http://adv.email.it/cgi-bin/foclick.cgi?mid=3176&d=20050512 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Please accept linphone into sarge (was: libosip2 and libosip2-3)

Hi, Could linphone be accepted into sarge? Steve Langasek wrote: Nevertheless, since when all is said and done the only thing that kept libosip2 2.2.0 out of sarge was a spurious upload to change the maintainer field, and siproxd missed the freeze by one day, I'm (provisionally) approving both to g

Re: your mail

Il giorno gio, 12-05-2005 alle 04:11 -0700, Steve Langasek ha scritto: > Hi Stefano, [...] > I notice that the binary package went from 12MB in size to 772KB. Is this > expected? (I'm happy to be able to save the space in the archive, as long > as it doesn't mean something is missing. :) I am go

Re: please put fai 2.8.2 into testing/sa

On Wed, May 11, 2005 at 12:05:55PM +0200, Holger Levsen wrote: > On Sunday 08 May 2005 02:56, Steve Langasek wrote: > > While I'm sure all of the changes you've made are justified in their own > > right, we can't justify spending release team time on reviewing changes > > that don't meet the criter

Please approve libflash to enter in Sarge

Hi , Please approve source package libflash version 0.4.11-5 in sarge. because 0.4.11-3 has had a releasecritical bug, which was fixed in 0.4.11-4 ( #282062, #283408, #290801, #295133 ). Regards Iwamatsu -- Nobuhiro Iwamatsu < hemamu @ t-base.ne.jp > < iwamatsu @ nigauri.org >

Re: Accepted lesstif1-1 1:0.93.94-11.3 (i386 source all)

On Tue, May 10, 2005 at 08:43:51PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote: [...] > This seems broken: > > - sprintf(buf, "compress > \"%s\"", filename); > - if (!(mdata->stream.file = popen(buf, "w"))) > + snprintf(buf, sizeof(buf), "compress > \"%s\"", filename); > + if (!

Re: [Fwd: bacula_1.36.3-1_i386.changes ACCEPTED]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Steve Langasek wrote: > Hi José Luis, > > On Thu, May 12, 2005 at 02:24:53AM +0200, José Luis Tallón wrote: > >> This is to request the new version of Bacula to be included in >> Sarge. This version fixes several important bugs, most >> importantly an

Re: your mail

Hi Stefano, On Thu, May 12, 2005 at 10:54:16AM +0200, Stefano Melchior <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Giuseppe Sacco (in Cc) gently uploaded the new release of aspell-it > (0.60-2). Now it is in unstable for a bit more than a couple of days. > I would like you to take in consideration of including

Re: libusb status update

Hi. Aurelien Jarno wrote: > libchipcard2 > > Bug report filled Thanks Aurelien, for taking the time to write up the detailed explanation with the bug report, I've uploaded the fix, all this doesn't affect sarge though, as libchipcard2 isn't in it. Kind regards T. -- Thomas Viehman

One more squid upload. Directions?

Hi all, I'd like to make one more bug-fixing, sarge-targetted squid upload, to address a minor security issue http://www.squid-cache.org/Versions/v2/2.5/bugs/#squid-2.5.STABLE9-dns_query and another corner case of the 2GB file support patch http://www.squid-cache.org/Versions/v2/2.5/bugs/#squid-

Re: Please approve gnome-vfs2 2.8.4-4 for sarge

Hi Sjoerd, On Thu, May 12, 2005 at 11:46:48AM +0200, Sjoerd Simons wrote: > I've just uploaded gnome-vfs2 2.8.4-4. Which fixes gnome bug 303470[0]. The > result of this bug is that when gnome-vfs is used to copy directories, the > dir info (atime, mtime, etc) isn't copied correctly. Which re

[joeyh@debian.org: Re: packages missing from sarge]

Hello, as the maintainer of the polyxmass-doc package, I would like to ask if it were possible to make it into Sarge. Please find below an exchange of mails between my mentor (DD Lionel Mamane, CC'd) and Joey Hess (CC'd), who both think that this package might well be put into Sarge. I hope th

Please approve gnome-vfs2 2.8.4-4 for sarge

Hi, I've just uploaded gnome-vfs2 2.8.4-4. Which fixes gnome bug 303470[0]. The result of this bug is that when gnome-vfs is used to copy directories, the dir info (atime, mtime, etc) isn't copied correctly. Which results in directories dated in 1970 :(.. Which is rather nasty and should b

Re: apt-build 0.11.10 into sarge

Hi Julien, On Thu, May 12, 2005 at 10:07:39AM +0200, Julien Danjou wrote: > apt-build 0.11.10 only contains a vietnamese template translation add > (closing #308608). > Please, allow it to reach Sarge. Approved. Thanks, -- Steve Langasek postmodern programmer signature.asc Description: Digit

[no subject]

eggere dai virus il tuo computer e come eliminare ogni tipo di virus! - clicca qui Clicca qui: http://adv.email.it/cgi-bin/foclick.cgi?mid=3212&d=20050512 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: libusb status update

Steve Langasek a écrit : gnupg2 -- Fixed, but the binary NMU has to be pushed into Sarge Can't be done; according to update_output.txt, updating gnupg2/arm fails with: trying: gnupg2/arm skipped: gnupg2/arm (0 <- 20) got: 2+0: a-0:a-2 * arm: gpgsm, kleopatra kleopatra is uninstallable

Re: libosip2 and libosip2-3

Steve, > Yasuhiro, > > On Thu, May 12, 2005 at 12:25:41AM +0900, ARAKI Yasuhiro wrote: > > In conclusion, we should ship libosip2 2.0.6 with sarge. > > And I will fix for 2.0.6. It includes a potential security risk. > > It is same as #305729. > > Well, the conclusion of my previous message was

Re: Please let calamaris 2.59-5 into testing: translation updates

* Philipp Frauenfelder ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [050511 14:50]: > After uploading -4 into unstable, a typo was found in the > debconf templates. I have fixed it and requested (and received) > updated translations. The changelog entry closes > #307994, #308165, #308214, #308348, #308430. approved. Than

apt-build 0.11.10 into sarge

Hello, apt-build 0.11.10 only contains a vietnamese template translation add (closing #308608). Please, allow it to reach Sarge. Cheers, -- Julien Danjou // <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://julien.danjou.info // 9A0D 5FD9 EB42 22F6 8974 C95C A462 B51E C2FE E5CD signature.asc Description: Digita

Re: wmaker: restarts on window resize

Hi Marcelo, I've prepared a 0-day NMU for this bug, based on Timo's patch. The full diff is attached. I made an abortive attempt to use "variable" as the fallback instead of "fixed", since that seemed more in line with the use of helvetica; but it turns out that the "variable" font alias in xfon

Re: push lurker 1.3-2 into sarge

On 10/05/2005 Andreas Barth wrote: > * Jonas Meurer ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [050510 18:15]: > > please push lurker 1.3-2 into sarge. the version currently in sarge > > (1.2-5) has some annoying bugs like problems with timestamp, and lurker > > 1.3 is a bugfix-only release. additionally several template

Re: libusb status update

Hi Aurelien, On Wed, May 11, 2005 at 03:26:34PM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote: > Here is an update for the status of the libusb bug on ARM. > libchipcard2 > > Bug report filled Noted, thanks. > gnupg2 > -- > Fixed, but the binary NMU has to be pushed into Sarge Can't be done; ac

Re: libosip2 and libosip2-3

Yasuhiro, On Thu, May 12, 2005 at 12:25:41AM +0900, ARAKI Yasuhiro wrote: > In conclusion, we should ship libosip2 2.0.6 with sarge. > And I will fix for 2.0.6. It includes a potential security risk. > It is same as #305729. Well, the conclusion of my previous message was that, even though I don'

Re: Please push openct 0.6.4-2 and opensc 0.9.6-1 into testing

On Thu, May 12, 2005 at 02:24:01AM -0400, Eric Dorland wrote: > > On Wed, May 11, 2005 at 01:23:36AM -0400, Eric Dorland wrote: > > > Although not reported as a bug, openct 0.6.2 (the version in testing) > > > needed a soname bump but didn't get it. 0.6.4 fixes that problem, and > > > since opensc