On Tue, Apr 26, 2005 at 05:47:54PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 27, 2005 at 08:35:54AM +1000, Hamish Moffatt wrote:
> > According to http://bjorn.haxx.se/debian/testing.pl?package=geda
> > package geda was removed from testing as requested by vorlon (Steve).
> > Same for geda-gnetlist
- Original Message -
From: Kirby<[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
<[EMAIL PROTECTED] >
You can download full length adult DVDs from the comfort
of your own home, and keep them forever...
all DVDs are downloadable in full length or by chapte
On Tue, Apr 26, 2005 at 08:08:34PM -0400, Glenn LEE wrote:
>
> - Original Message -
> From: Glenn LEE
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Cc: debian-release@lists.debian.org
> Sent: Sunday, April 17, 2005 8:30 PM
> Subject: Re: Your Woman's Day Customer Service Request
> I just changed the zip t
On Wed, Apr 27, 2005 at 08:35:54AM +1000, Hamish Moffatt wrote:
> According to http://bjorn.haxx.se/debian/testing.pl?package=geda
> package geda was removed from testing as requested by vorlon (Steve).
> Same for geda-gnetlist, geda-gsymcheck and geda-utils.
> Why is that? I can't see any RC bugs
- Original Message -
From: Glenn LEE
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: debian-release@lists.debian.org
Sent: Sunday, April 17, 2005 8:30 PM
Subject: Re: Your Woman's Day Customer Service Request
I just changed the zip to the correct one.
thanks
Please change the mailing of my subscri
Hi,
According to http://bjorn.haxx.se/debian/testing.pl?package=geda
package geda was removed from testing as requested by vorlon (Steve).
Same for geda-gnetlist, geda-gsymcheck and geda-utils.
Why is that? I can't see any RC bugs in any of them.
Thanks,
Hamish
--
Hamish Moffatt VK3SB <[EMAIL
On Tue, Apr 26, 2005 at 01:31:46AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 26, 2005 at 09:15:09AM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
> > A proposal for a simplification, which reduces/avoids the renaming of
> > the KDE packages. All KDE packages depend directly or indirectly on
> > libqt3, so it is en
On Tue, Apr 26, 2005 at 11:52:25AM +0200, Achim Bohnet wrote:
> On Tuesday 26 April 2005 10:31, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 26, 2005 at 09:15:09AM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
> > > A proposal for a simplification, which reduces/avoids the renaming of
> > > the KDE packages. All KDE packa
On Tuesday 26 April 2005 10:31, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 26, 2005 at 09:15:09AM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
> > A proposal for a simplification, which reduces/avoids the renaming of
> > the KDE packages. All KDE packages depend directly or indirectly on
> > libqt3, so it is enough to r
Le Mardi 26 Avril 2005 11:18, Matthias Klose a écrit :
> the reason I wanted to void package renaming for kde is that most KDE
> packages ship with shared libs and binaries in the same package (at
> least these have an shlibs file). That should be fixed, but maybe not
> as part of the C++ transitio
Steve Langasek writes:
> On Tue, Apr 26, 2005 at 09:15:09AM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
> > A proposal for a simplification, which reduces/avoids the renaming of
> > the KDE packages. All KDE packages depend directly or indirectly on
> > libqt3, so it is enough to rename the packages libqt3c102 to
On Tue, Apr 26, 2005 at 09:15:09AM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
> A proposal for a simplification, which reduces/avoids the renaming of
> the KDE packages. All KDE packages depend directly or indirectly on
> libqt3, so it is enough to rename the packages libqt3c102 to libqt3
> and libqt3c102-mt to
A proposal for a simplification, which reduces/avoids the renaming of
the KDE packages. All KDE packages depend directly or indirectly on
libqt3, so it is enough to rename the packages libqt3c102 to libqt3
and libqt3c102-mt to libqt3-mt and add a conflict with th old name.
This way, you cannot inst
13 matches
Mail list logo
