Hi LaMont and Release Team,
I have dedicated some time to start preparing a modutils NMU fixing both
the current RC bugs and lot of longstanding bugs currently present and
really easy to fix. Attached is the resulting patch (currently untested,
I want to keep working on adding some more fixes).
* Tobias Stefan Richter ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [041022 21:30]:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > some remarks from me on that issue:
> > - we don't enforce that data matches the DFSG for release of sarge
> We don't?
> Might be true, but then this is the first time I hear about this.
>
> How about http:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> some remarks from me on that issue:
> - we don't enforce that data matches the DFSG for release of sarge
We don't?
Might be true, but then this is the first time I hear about this.
How about http://release.debian.org/sarge_rc_policy.txt ?
Is this outdated? Serious quest
Attention:
As of midnight, your family residence is Pre-Qualif i e d
for points from 3.25% - 5.35% 30 Y.R Fixe d .
Slow or none payment history OK; Maximum cashout for any reason;
4 out of 5 people accepted in most cases.
Follow this link now
http://www.kokmeowdm.com/
Thank You,
Susana Corona
Hi,
first of all the good news: Anthony Towns has pushed it back in time
into sarge, so it is not at all removed. Thanks, Anthony.
* Peter Eisentraut ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [041022 15:05]:
> 2. The bug in question was a build failure. If you're going to follow the
> bug-tracking system quasi blin
On Fri, 2004-10-22 at 00:31 +0200, Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 02, 2004 at 06:01:31PM -0400, Andres Salomon wrote:
> > The kernel team is considering dropping 386 support (the 80386
> > processor, not the i386 arch) from Debian. Currently, in order to
> > support 386, we include a 486 e
* Peter Eisentraut ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [041022 15:05]:
> Am Freitag, 22. Oktober 2004 14:17 schrieb Andreas Barth:
> > However, licq will re-enter testing once
> > the RC-bug is solved with your next upload.
> Except that this package depends on KDE, so we are possibly going to be stuck
> withou
Am Freitag, 22. Oktober 2004 14:17 schrieb Andreas Barth:
> The current RC-bug that you just set to pending now - but I guess that
> was just 10 hours too late. I uncommented the hint now, but AFAICS, it
> will still be executed tonight.
I understand. But two comments on that:
1. I'm all for agg
* Peter Eisentraut ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [041022 14:15]:
> I happened to read that licq is scheduled for removal today:
>
> http://bjorn.haxx.se/debian/testing.pl?package=licq
>
> Does someone know why that is?
The current RC-bug that you just set to pending now - but I guess that
was just 10 hour
I happened to read that licq is scheduled for removal today:
http://bjorn.haxx.se/debian/testing.pl?package=licq
Does someone know why that is? The same questions goes for
http://bjorn.haxx.se/debian/testing.pl?package=licq-plugin-osd
On Fri, Oct 22, 2004 at 01:41:18AM +0100, Paul Martin wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 21, 2004 at 12:08:12PM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > On Thu, Oct 21, 2004 at 01:45:14AM +0100, Paul Martin wrote:
> > > On Sun, Oct 17, 2004 at 09:57:37PM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > > > Package: popt
> > > > Version: 1.7-
Hi,
* Tobias Stefan Richter ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [041022 12:50]:
> though stars is in the main section, it presently requires unpackaged
> data files (probably considered non-free) to work.
>
> See: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=276467
>
> You'll find a request to lower the pr
Hi,
though stars is in the main section, it presently requires unpackaged
data files (probably considered non-free) to work.
See: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=276467
You'll find a request to lower the priority of the bug report there,
but I think the purpose of the RC severi
13 matches
Mail list logo
