Jay,
I'm sorry for not replying to this earlier.
On Sun, Jul 18, 2004 at 10:33:43AM -0400, Jay Berkenbilt wrote:
> Executive summary: there are compelling arguments in favor of closing
> all these bugs and letting libtiff-3.6.1 go into sarge. The only
> change required to this package is an upd
Hi.
Several months ago it was proposed (from the RM IIRC) to introduce
new WNPP tags: RFH (request for help) and ITH/OTH (offer to help)
I myself have to take a part of the blame that the discussion
died out since I proposed to technically implement this but it
was first impossible due to the com
On Thu, Jul 22, 2004 at 04:55:03 +0200, Robert Joerdens wrote:
> Hallo Sebastian!
>
> Sebastian Gutsfeld schrieb am Monday, den 19. July 2004:
>
> > | jamin 0.8.0
> > | Cannot find plugin 'lookahead_limiter_const_1906.so'
> > | Cannot find preferred limiter, looking for alternative
> > | Cannot f
Hallo Sebastian!
Sebastian Gutsfeld schrieb am Monday, den 19. July 2004:
> | jamin 0.8.0
> | Cannot find plugin 'lookahead_limiter_const_1906.so'
> | Cannot find preferred limiter, looking for alternative
> | Cannot find plugin 'lookahead_limiter_1435.so'
> | Required plugin missing.
>
> As loo
Hi all,
I'm afraid this message seems to have slipped past me on the list -- and
past others as well, given the apparent lack of response in the archive.
Sorry for that. Let's see what we can do about remedying that
oversight...
On Tue, 15 Jun 2004 Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote:
> Being referred
On Thu, Jul 22, 2004 at 12:15:41PM +0900, Horms wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 21, 2004 at 02:07:02PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > Hi Horms,
> >
> > On Wed, Jul 21, 2004 at 09:14:34PM +0900, Horms wrote:
> > > On Wed, Jul 21, 2004 at 01:50:09PM +0200, maximilian attems wrote:
> > > > it was a pci "fix"
6 matches
Mail list logo
