Re: status of non-US?

2004-06-22 Thread Matt Zimmerman
On Wed, Jun 23, 2004 at 12:50:05AM +0200, Frederik Schueler wrote: > Since sarge will release with "crypto in main", what is the current > status of the remaining packages in non-US? Can't all packages be > migrated into main so sarge can release without non-US? > > According to the Sources.gz f

status of non-US?

2004-06-22 Thread Frederik Schueler
Hi, Since sarge will release with "crypto in main", what is the current status of the remaining packages in non-US? Can't all packages be migrated into main so sarge can release without non-US? According to the Sources.gz files on non-us.debian.org we have 16 source packages left in non-us/main

OEMCDSoftware.ManySpecialOffers

2004-06-22 Thread Meministri
http://Kvitv.bjckkbff.info/?0fy5yhwaB47Viw0GLTcZ

Re: Please don't remove lilypond; a new version is awaiting confirmation

2004-06-22 Thread Andreas Barth
tags 250622 +pending thanks * Anthony Fok ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [040622 05:55]: > On Fri, 18 Jun 2004 18:51:27 +0200, Andreas Barth wrote: > > # Package: lilypond (optional; Anthony Fok)remove lilypond/2.1.0-2 > > # 250622 [ ] lilypond: FTBFS error: `gs' failed (status 139) > > # no ma

Re: Please don't remove lilypond; a new version is awaiting confirmation

2004-06-22 Thread Andreas Metzler
On 2004-06-22 Anthony Fok <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Fri, 18 Jun 2004 18:51:27 +0200, Andreas Barth wrote: > > # Package: lilypond (optional; Anthony Fok)remove lilypond/2.1.0-2 > > # 250622 [ ] lilypond: FTBFS error: `gs' failed (status 139) > > # no maintainer reaction [...] >