Re: SableVM stalled in SID again?

2004-04-29 Thread Grzegorz B. Prokopski
On (27/04/04 22:33), Steve Langasek wrote: > Hi Grzegorz, > > On Tue, Apr 27, 2004 at 01:36:58PM -0400, Grzegorz B. Prokopski wrote: > > > sorry for bothering you, but there's something wrong (again) w/ migration > > of SableVM packages to testing. Last time 1.1.0-5 was "hinted", so I > > though

Re: Upload of GNOME 2.6 to unstable

2004-04-29 Thread Wouter Verhelst
On Fri, Apr 30, 2004 at 02:17:57AM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote: > On Tue, Apr 27, 2004 at 12:20:52PM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote: > > Also, I don't see why you would want to manually specify what stuff to > > take from unstable instead of experimental? Isn't build-depends meant > > for that? > > I

Re: Upload of GNOME 2.6 to unstable

2004-04-29 Thread Anthony Towns
On Tue, Apr 27, 2004 at 12:20:52PM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote: > No, this may be not such a good idea after all. I don't think that a > maintainer who uploads something to the archives wouldn't want it to be > built if he had the choice, so most packages would be built anyway. > Giving people the

Bug#246556: please remove bookmarker

2004-04-29 Thread Rene Engelhard
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Package: ftp.debian.org Hi, Tobias Toedter wrote: > ==> remove bookmarker/2.8.0-4 > RC bug #238000, I offered to do a (sponsored) NMU, maintainer first accepted > it, afterwards he asked me not to do the NMU and suggested to remove the > package co

Removal suggestion

2004-04-29 Thread Tobias Toedter
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 ==> remove bookmarker/2.8.0-4 RC bug #238000, I offered to do a (sponsored) NMU, maintainer first accepted it, afterwards he asked me not to do the NMU and suggested to remove the package completely from the archives. However, no bug against ftp.deb