On Fri, Apr 30, 2004 at 02:17:57AM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote: > On Tue, Apr 27, 2004 at 12:20:52PM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote: > > Also, I don't see why you would want to manually specify what stuff to > > take from unstable instead of experimental? Isn't build-depends meant > > for that? > > I don't think it'd work without lots of effort -- selecting packages > from a suite needs to be done explicitly rather than by a build-depends > afaics; happy to be proven wrong though.
I was thinking about versioned build-depends, which would work only if
experimental wouldn't shift too much between the time of upload and the
time of build.
On the other hand, I don't think it'd be a problem if a package migrated
to unstable between the time a depending-on package has been uploaded
and the time it has been built; after all, TTBOMK one is only interested
in knowing possible interactions with a certain specific version of a
package, not with "the version of a package that happens to be in
experimental currently, whatever that may be".
--
EARTH
smog | bricks
AIR -- mud -- FIRE
soda water | tequila
WATER
-- with thanks to fortune
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
