severity 227464 important
reassign 232664 uucp
thanks
On Wed, Mar 24, 2004 at 09:04:52PM -0500, Nathanael Nerode wrote:
> => easy xfree86/4.3.0-7 sppc/1.0.1-7 tulip/1.2.5-4
> Lets XFree86 in.
Added as "hint xfree86/4.3.0-7", in case there are other packages
lurking that haven't been built for alp
The HINTS!
=> easy xfree86/4.3.0-7 sppc/1.0.1-7 tulip/1.2.5-4
Lets XFree86 in.
=> easy lam/7.0.4-2 blacs-mpi/1.1-21 scalapack/1.7-7 python-scientific/2.4.5-2
hdf5/1.6.1-4 netpipe/3.6-1 xmpi/2.2.3b8-3
Lets that whole list in.
=> easy lm-sensors/2.8.5-3 mrtgutils/0.5 wmsensors/1.0.4-3.3
hardware
On Wed, Mar 24, 2004 at 10:51:41AM +0100, J.H.M. Dassen (Ray) wrote:
> GNOME 2.6 is being uploaded to _experimental_; see
> http://pkg-gnome.alioth.debian.org/package-status.html for details.
That is good news and in fact I did know that already. I was really
trying to refer to the discussions abo
I'd appreciate an update on the sarge release plans / status as well.
I do feel the need to clarify the GNOME status though.
On Wed, Mar 24, 2004 at 09:05:22 +, Mark Howard wrote:
> Most developers are now still considering making big changes to their
> packages and even uploading huge new r
Hi,
There seems to be complete confusion over the release plans for sarge.
Following this list, looking at all the BSPs, d-i status, previous
release plans I would expect that sarge is nearly ready for release.
That means that all developers should be concentrating on making sure
that their packag
5 matches
Mail list logo
