akonadi_0.80.0-1_i386.changes REJECTED

x27;t want to list them explicitly) are actually covered more permissive licenses and the aggregate is then LGPL seems to be good courtesy. Kind regards T. -- Thomas Viehmann, http://thomas.viehmann.net/ === If you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if the override fil

Comments regarding phonon_4.2~svn820171-1_multi.changes

Hi, some things I noted about phonon and it's copyright documentation: - You don't want to use N/A as meaning some default and you don't want to use it when the file itself has a copyright notice attached to it, even if it's just a cmake control file. - The note on phonon/audiooutputadapto

Bug#486343: information in debian/copyright missing

as KDE4 stays as much of a moving target as it seems to be at the moment). It seems that (at least) the version of kdebase-runtime currently in experimental needs some attention. Keep up the good work! Kind regards T. -- Thomas Viehmann, http://thomas.viehmann.net/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to

kdeplasma-addons_4.0.98-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

Hi Ana, unfortunately, I had a look at the tarball, and tried to find the copyright notices for binaryclock in the debian/copyright. An then the panda shed a tear[1] and I rejected the package. Kind regards T. 1. http://halbgar.com/images/panda.png === If you don't understand why your files

kdeplasma-addons_4.0.98-1_multi.changes REJECTED

Hi, Laurent Montel's copyright notice (he has copyright notices in calculator) is still missing. There might be others later. Kind regards T. === If you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if the override file requires editing, reply to this email. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email t

Comments regarding kdeplasma-addons_4.0.98-1_multi.changes

Hi Sune, I'll accept kdeplasma-addons but there are the following packaging issues to look at: in debian/copyright: >Copyright (C) 2007-2008 Sebastian Kuegler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Copyright (C) 2007-2008 Sebastian Kuegler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> is only needed once > Lancelot is almost enti

Bug#497290: debian/copyright misses information

Package: kde-i18n Version: 4:3.5.9-2 Severity: serious Hi, debian/copyright seems to need a makeover. Kind regards T. -- Thomas Viehmann, http://thomas.viehmann.net/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

getfem++_3.1-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

Hi Xavier, unfortunately, I seem to be unable to find the Build-Depends: ..., automake1.10, ... this makes it a reject. On a minor note: It seems odd that QT/KDE maintainers maintain a FEM package. Did you try to talk to the Debian Scientific Computing Team <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ? Kind regards

Re: getfem++_3.1-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

mistake, apologies. While purely virtual build-depends (without a real package) are often fishy, it seems OK in this case and certainly not serious enough to reject the package. Can you reupload. Kind regards T. -- Thomas Viehmann, http://thomas.viehmann.net/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email

getfem++_3.1-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

Hi Xavier, so unfortunately, this reject will be more work: - there seem to be more copyrights in superlu, e.g. LAPACK stuff from the U of Tennessee. Even if it doesn't have a copyright notice in those files, it seems to me that the LAPACK providence indicates that they own the copyright

Re: Help needed for #377468

demonstrated in Debian over and over again and not an argument in itself. Kind regards T. -- Thomas Viehmann, http://thomas.viehmann.net/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qt-kde-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org