Hi Xavier, so unfortunately, this reject will be more work: - there seem to be more copyrights in superlu, e.g. LAPACK stuff from the U of Tennessee. Even if it doesn't have a copyright notice in those files, it seems to me that the LAPACK providence indicates that they own the copyright. - The license is the GNU Lesser General Public License Version 2.1 or .... (note the 2.1 for LGPL, not 2.0) - On a minor note (nice to be fixed, but probably not a reject): Please match the years of the getfem copyright notices to those in the files. Most of the people that show up with one year in debian/copyright are credited for ranges in the individual files.
Kind regards T. === If you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if the override file requires editing, reply to this email. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qt-kde-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
