KDE_3_4_BRANCH: kdenetwork/debian/patches

CVS commit by loschwitz: Adding yet another batch of files as of 20050327 A001-kdenetwork-branch_20050326.diff 1.1.2.1 A07_xlibs-static-pic.diff 1.1.2.1 A10_kppp_options.diff 1.1.2.1 A98_buildprep.diff 1.1.2.1 -- To UNSUBSCRIB

KDE_3_4_BRANCH: kdenetwork/debian/patches/common

CVS commit by loschwitz: Adding the third batch of files as of 20050327 A02_autotools_update.diff 1.1.2.1 A03_libtool_update.diff 1.1.2.1 A04_am_maintainer_mode.diff 1.1.2.1 A05_pedantic-errors.diff 1.1.2.1 A06_automa

KDE_3_4_BRANCH: kdenetwork/debian

CVS commit by loschwitz: Checking in the second batch of files as of 20050327 Akdenetwork-filesharing.install 1.1.2.1 Akdenetwork-kfile-plugins.install 1.2.2.1 Akopete.README.Debian 1.1.2.1 Akopete.postinst 1.1.2.1 Ak

KDE_3_4_BRANCH: kdenetwork/debian/cdbs

CVS commit by loschwitz: Checking the cdbs directory in Akde.mk 1.1.2.1 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

KDE_3_4_BRANCH: kdenetwork/debian

CVS commit by loschwitz: Updated to the kdenetwork packages by the KDE Maintainers Group as of 20030327 M +108 -0changelog 1.116.2.1 M +51 -10control 1.104.2.1 M +3 -4 copyright 1.10.4.1 M +4 -4 dcoprss.install 1.2.4.1 M +23 -22kdict.install 1.11.4.1

Re: Processing of kdelibs_3.3.0-1_i386.changes

se. > > sorry if its already written somewhere: > > Are we working on getting 3.3 into sarge? > I just want to know it to get i18n uploaded when the translators are ready. > > thx. > Yes we are. > -- > Noèl Köthe > Debian GNU/Linux, www.debian.org -- .'

Re: Announcing the availability of first Qt 3.3 packages

On Tue, Jun 15, 2004 at 02:40:57PM -0700, Brian Nelson wrote: > Martin Loschwitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > If your Qt package were properly maintained, I wouldn't bother you with > So you admit you are bothering? That's a point to start. > this. However,

Re: Announcing the availability of first Qt 3.3 packages

n out to be nothing but castrated if you look at them closely. And some wild number games, of course. I don't know what your original intention was but to me it seems that all you do is trolling to gain attention. Don't expect me to treat you with only a little amount of seriousness; don't expect me to deal with you anymore. > > So ultimately we're talking about a 2M difference for a developers and > 600K for users or buildds, with the trade-off being far simpler packages > (8 packages vs. 23 or whatever the current number is) with fewer bugs > (no missing files). > > -- > You win again, gravity! -- .''`. Martin Loschwitz Debian GNU/Linux developer : :' : [EMAIL PROTECTED][EMAIL PROTECTED] `. `'` http://www.madkiss.org/people.debian.org/~madkiss/ `- Use Debian GNU/Linux 3.0! See http://www.debian.org/ signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Announcing the availability of first Qt 3.3 packages

packages turn out to be okay, I will fix the mentioned minor bugs and upload 3.3.2-1 to the official unstable archive as soon as the -0pre1-packages made it into experimental. -- .''`. Martin Loschwitz Debian GNU/Linux developer : :' : [EMAIL PROTECTED][

Re: QT needs new maintainer(s), or at least an NMU

s far as I am concerned, KDE 3.2 is still not officially certified for running with Qt 3.3, is it? Anyway, Qt 3.3 should not go into Sarge, I think. > Since Martin Loschwitz has not kept the QT packages in a releasable state, > and indeed has (from what I've seen) not responded to request

Re: KDE 3.2.1 Status Update - 20040309

quite a motivating way to work, so, why don't you go to ftp-masters and tell them "APPROVE! APPROVE! APPROVE! WORK WORK WORK! DEVELOP DEVELOP DEVELOP!"? ;-)) > -- > Noèl Köthe > Debian GNU/Linux, www.debian.org -- .''`. Martin Loschwitz

Re: Orphaning Packages

, > Chris Cheney If nobody objects, I can take over resposibility for these packages and do my best to get them ready for release. I, however, will also try to establish the maintainer group in order to avoid events like the one described above in the future. -- .''`.

Re: Policy for Debian Qt/KDE Maintainers Group

bugs which belong to your packages by searching for the package name instead of the name of the maintainer. > Ben. :) -- .''`. Martin Loschwitz Debian GNU/Linux developer : :' : [EMAIL PROTECTED][EMAIL PROTECTED] `. `'` http://www.madk

Re: Policy for Debian Qt/KDE Maintainers Group

omes possible. CVS pisses some people (me included) off badly and SVN appears to be a really good alternative. > b. -- .''`. Martin Loschwitz Debian GNU/Linux developer : :' : [EMAIL PROTECTED][EMAIL PROTECTED] `. `'` http://www.madkis

Policy for Debian Qt/KDE Maintainers Group

eeds to be changed in their opinion? And can those who do not have any objections please let us know that too? Thanks in advance, -- .''`. Martin Loschwitz Debian GNU/Linux developer : :' : [EMAIL PROTECTED][EMAIL PROTECTED] `. `'` http://www.mad

qt-copy/debian

CVS commit by loschwitz: Update to latest debian packages (3:3.2.1-6) Acompat 1.1 Apatches/10_qpsprinter-3.2.2.dpatch 1.1 Apatches/11_qmake_pkgconfig.dpatch 1.1 Apatches/12_xinerama_pic.dpatch 1.1 M +11 -0 changelog 1.60

Re: Qt 3.2.1 missing support for Xcursor....

--- > Ralf Nolden > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > The K Desktop Environment The KDevelop Project > http://www.kde.org http://www.kdevelop.org -- .''`. Martin Loschwitz Debian GNU/Linux developer :

Here we go

It appears debian-qt-kde is up and kicking? Let's go and get the party started then. :) -- .''`. Martin Loschwitz Debian GNU/Linux developer : :' : [EMAIL PROTECTED][EMAIL PROTECTED] `. `'` http://www.madkiss.org/people.debian.org/~madk