On Sat, 2013-08-03 at 07:18 +, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
> Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
>
> > # britney seems to be confused and doesn't let open-vm-tools
> > # 2:9.2.3-1031360-6 migrate because it would introduce new bugs
> > # (begin #717154) eventhough that bug i
Control: reassign -1 open-vm-dkms
On Sat, 2013-08-03 at 12:44 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> The BTS indicates that #717154 only applies to unstable, and is thus
> "new". That's perfectly logical, since the open-vm-tools-dkms binary
> package only exists in unstable - the
Source: net-luminis-build-plugin
Version: 0.2.0-4
Severity: serious
X-Debbugs-Cc: ta...@debian.org
Hi,
The upload of net-luminis-build-plugin which orphaned it appears to
have generated a broken Maintainer field:
Package: net-luminis-build-plugin
Binary: libnet-luminis-build-plugin-java
Version
On Thu, 2010-12-30 at 19:08 +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 23, 2010 at 21:38:02 +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
>
> > It's probably worth a mention in the release notes though. If anyone
> > looking at this bug could propose some wording for this, that would be
> > appreciated :)
> >
>
Package: binutils-z80
Version: 2.21.52-2
Severity: serious
Hi,
binutils-z80 build-depends on "binutils-source (<< 2.21.53)", but
unstable now has 2.21.53.20110823-3 thus rendering -z80 unbuildable.
Regards,
Adam
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-packages-requ...@lists.debian.org
with
Source: qpxtool
Version: 0.7.1.002-5
Severity: serious
Hi,
qpxtool FTBFS on kfreebsd-{amd64,i386} when rebuilt for the freebsd-libs
transition. From the kfreebsd-amd64 build log:
g++ -Wall -O2 -fPIC -DUSE_LIBPNG -g -I. -I./include -I../include -c -o
qpx_transport.o qpx_transport.cpp
In fil
Package: gadmintools
Version: 9+nmu1
Severity: serious
Hi,
gadmintools is uninstallable in unstable and testing. It depends on
gadmin-squid, which was removed from the archive in July 2011.
Regards,
Adam
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-packages-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subjec
On Sat, 2013-04-27 at 17:40 -0400, Michael Gilbert wrote:
> So, I've found that this version of python-qpid needs an amqp 0-10
> spec file, but a bsd-licensed version seems to not exist (and I've
> spent about an hour doing search variants for that):
> http://www.amqp.org/specification/0-10/amqp-or
user release.debian@packages.debian.org
usertags 706101 + wheezy-can-defer
tags 706101 + wheezy-ignore
thanks
On Sat, 2013-04-27 at 17:40 -0400, Michael Gilbert wrote:
> So, this situation is quite unfortunate. I guess the only solution at
> this point is wheezy-ignore?
Agreed, as upstream ar
On Tue, 2009-11-17 at 21:02 +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 19:10:01 +0000, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > >From reading the bug log for #521107, it appears that the maintainer
> > disagrees either that there is an issue which requires fixing, or with
> >
On Wed, 2009-11-18 at 01:25 -0300, Luciano Bello wrote:
> El Mar 17 Nov 2009, Adam D. Barratt escribió:
> > >From a stable-update point-of-view, I'd also prefer that it was fixed in
> >
> > unstable first. It's a lot easier to fix sid if any unforeseen problems
Package: multisync
Version: 0.82-9
Severity: serious
Hi,
multisync FTBFS against evolution 2.30, which is now in unstable.
>From the build log:
checking for pkg-config... /usr/bin/pkg-config
configure: error: Library requirements (gtk+-2.0 libgnomeui-2.0 libbonoboui-2.0
glib-2.0 libbonobo-2.0
On Tuesday, December 06, 2005 10:49 AM, Jeroen van Wolffelaar
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 06, 2005 at 11:46:24AM +0100, Martin Rasp wrote:
>> Hi.
>>
>> I tried to contact the maintainer of dazuko-source (John Ogness
>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>) due to a compile problem. As a result I got a
On Sat, 2016-10-22 at 11:17 +0300, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 22, 2016 at 04:39:13AM +, Debian testing autoremoval watch
> wrote:
> > premail 0.46-10 is marked for autoremoval from testing on 2016-11-20
> >
> > It (build-)depends on packages with these RC bugs:
> > 837712: xemacs21: FTB
On Wed, 2021-09-08 at 16:58 +0100, lkcl wrote:
> schroot 1.6.10 (04 May 2014) fails with a continuous attempt to read
> a non-existent subdirectory, /run/systemd/userdb, when operating a
> type "directory" schroot.
>
So far as I can see from the strace output you provided, that doesn't
actually a
On Wed, 2021-09-08 at 18:21 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> On Wed, 2021-09-08 at 16:58 +0100, lkcl wrote:
> > schroot 1.6.10 (04 May 2014) fails with a continuous attempt to
> > read
> > a non-existent subdirectory, /run/systemd/userdb, when operating a
> > type "
On Sun, 2015-10-11 at 16:50 +0100, Dominic Hargreaves wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 14, 2015 at 01:36:05AM +, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
>
> > ndisc6 (1.0.1-2) unstable; urgency=medium
> > .
> >* QA upload.
> >* Set maintainer to the Debian QA Group (see #713004).
> >* Add conflict
"Craig P. Steffen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote, Wednesday, May 26, 2004
5:23 AM
[big snip]
> What does "FTBFS" stand for?
Fails To Build From Source.
Regards,
Adam
18 matches
Mail list logo
