On Tue, 2009-11-17 at 21:02 +0100, Julien Cristau wrote: > On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 19:10:01 +0000, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > > >From reading the bug log for #521107, it appears that the maintainer > > disagrees either that there is an issue which requires fixing, or with > > the proposed fix (which of those two options is applicable wasn't > > entirely clear to me as there's no reply to his last message in the > > log). Is that the case? > > > This was clarified in a private discussion with Luciano, sorry for not > updating the bug log.
Ah; thanks for the clarification. > Luciano's last patch seems fine. I still believe this is a pretty minor > issue, and I think it should be fixed in sid before being considered for > stable, but I don't have an objection to this update. >From a stable-update point-of-view, I'd also prefer that it was fixed in unstable first. It's a lot easier to fix sid if any unforeseen problems arise. :) Regards, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-packages-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
