On 17 May 2006 22:43, Reuben Thomas wrote:
> On Wed, 17 May 2006, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
>
> On 2006-04-19 15:11:20 +0100, Reuben Thomas wrote:
>>
>>> I can get some Ctrl-letter keys to work by doing things like:
>>>
>>> "\x1": kill-whole-line # binds C-a to kill-whole-line
>>>
>>> but \x15 does
libvigraimpex_1.9.0+dfsg-3_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
libvigraimpex_1.9.0+dfsg-3.dsc
libvigraimpex_1.9.0+dfsg-3.debian.tar.gz
libvigraimpex-dev_1.9.0+dfsg-3_i386.deb
libvigraimpex4_1.9.0+dfsg-3_i386.deb
python-vigra_1.9.0+dfsg-3_i386.deb
libvig
Your message dated Sun, 19 May 2013 15:04:24 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#701313: fixed in libvigraimpex 1.9.0+dfsg-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #701313,
regarding libvigraimpex: ftbfs with GCC-4.8
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt
Accepted:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
Format: 1.8
Date: Sun, 19 May 2013 15:44:09 +0200
Source: libvigraimpex
Binary: libvigraimpex-dev libvigraimpex4 libvigraimpex-doc python-vigra
python-vigra-doc
Architecture: source i386 all
Version: 1.9.0+dfsg-3
Distribution: experi
On 2013-05-19 14:17:59 +0100, Reuben Thomas wrote:
> This bug still exists, but I'm no longer sure to which package it should be
> assigned. I come across the bug in bash 4.2, which doesn't seem to depend
> on any version of libreadline now (e.g. bash 4.2-5).
It seems that bash now includes its ow
On 19 May 2013 17:55, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> On 2013-05-19 14:17:59 +0100, Reuben Thomas wrote:
> > This bug still exists, but I'm no longer sure to which package it should
> be
> > assigned. I come across the bug in bash 4.2, which doesn't seem to depend
> > on any version of libreadline now (
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> found 363502 5.2+dfsg-2
Bug #363502 [libreadline5] libreadline5: Something is wrong with binding keys
to functions
Marked as found in versions readline5/5.2+dfsg-2.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
found 363502 5.2+dfsg-2
thanks
On 2013-05-19 20:49:43 +0100, Reuben Thomas wrote:
> libreadline5 seems to be used by few programs now, so it's not so
> important. I think it's most important that it be filed against
> libreadline6 and bash. However, since it's likely to be the same bug in
> librea
On 19 May 2013 22:18, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> found 363502 5.2+dfsg-2
> thanks
>
> On 2013-05-19 20:49:43 +0100, Reuben Thomas wrote:
> > libreadline5 seems to be used by few programs now, so it's not so
> > important. I think it's most important that it be filed against
> > libreadline6 and bas
Processing control commands:
> clone -1 -2 -3
Bug #363502 [libreadline5] libreadline5: Something is wrong with binding keys
to functions
Bug 363502 cloned as bugs 708978-708979
> reassign -1 libreadline6
Bug #363502 [libreadline5] libreadline5: Something is wrong with binding keys
to functions
B
Control: clone -1 -2 -3
Control: reassign -1 libreadline6
Control: retitle -1 libreadline6: Something is wrong with binding keys to
functions
Control: found -1 6.2+dfsg-0.1
Control: reassign -3 bash
Control: retitle -3 bash (readline): Something is wrong with binding keys to
functions
Control: fo
11 matches
Mail list logo
