found 363502 5.2+dfsg-2 thanks On 2013-05-19 20:49:43 +0100, Reuben Thomas wrote: > libreadline5 seems to be used by few programs now, so it's not so > important. I think it's most important that it be filed against > libreadline6 and bash. However, since it's likely to be the same bug in > libreadline5 and libreadline6, and also because it seems logical, maybe it > should be cloned both to bash and libreadline6? Or assigned to libreadline6 > and cloned to bash and libreadline5?
I've checked that it still occurs with libreadline5 by installing units from squeeze. I could also reproduce the bug with clisp, whose unstable version still depends on libreadline5 (but I'm not sure that it really uses the library, as ldd doesn't list it). I think that the bug should be cloned twice, and have 2 reassign's (I don't know which package is best for the original bug number). -- Vincent Lefèvre <vinc...@vinc17.net> - Web: <http://www.vinc17.net/> 100% accessible validated (X)HTML - Blog: <http://www.vinc17.net/blog/> Work: CR INRIA - computer arithmetic / AriC project (LIP, ENS-Lyon) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-packages-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20130519211800.ga4...@xvii.vinc17.org
