Bug#232793: marked as done (Half-broken dependency on emacs20)

Your message dated Tue, 17 Aug 2004 03:36:04 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#232793: fixed in cedet 1:1.0beta3b-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is no

Bug#232753: marked as done (Half-broken dependency on emacs20)

Your message dated Tue, 17 Aug 2004 03:36:04 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#232753: fixed in cedet 1:1.0beta3b-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is no

Bug#178893: marked as done (gnucash: Documentation should be in, or linked to, /usr/share/doc/gnucash)

Your message dated Tue, 17 Aug 2004 09:51:35 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line No longer spread though the filesystem. has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#194857: marked as done (gnucash: Segfault on Startup)

Your message dated Tue, 17 Aug 2004 09:53:26 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Closing now. has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reo

Processing of mmake_2.2.1-4_i386.changes

mmake_2.2.1-4_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: mmake_2.2.1-4.dsc mmake_2.2.1-4.diff.gz mmake_2.2.1-4_all.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon

Bug#216534: marked as done (mmake: dependency on essential package)

Your message dated Tue, 17 Aug 2004 04:47:19 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#216534: fixed in mmake 2.2.1-4 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#199875: marked as done (Allow output to a filename other than 'Makefile')

Your message dated Tue, 17 Aug 2004 04:47:19 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#199875: fixed in mmake 2.2.1-4 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#255955: marked as done (mmake does not include a copyright file that actually includes the copyright of mmake)

Your message dated Tue, 17 Aug 2004 04:47:19 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#255955: fixed in mmake 2.2.1-4 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

mmake_2.2.1-4_i386.changes ACCEPTED

Accepted: mmake_2.2.1-4.diff.gz to pool/main/m/mmake/mmake_2.2.1-4.diff.gz mmake_2.2.1-4.dsc to pool/main/m/mmake/mmake_2.2.1-4.dsc mmake_2.2.1-4_all.deb to pool/main/m/mmake/mmake_2.2.1-4_all.deb Announcing to debian-devel-changes@lists.debian.org Closing bugs: 199875 216534 255955 Thank

Processed: reopen

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reopen 255955 Bug#255955: mmake does not include a copyright file that actually includes the copyright of mmake Bug reopened, originator not changed. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking sy

Bug#255955: reopen

reopen 255955 thanks This bug still exists; merely creating a copyright file doesn't do it. The package is not properly licensed under the GPL, and until we get clarification from upstream, we can't budge on release of it; and we must drop it from Debian if we don't hear at all. I'm tracking th

Bug#255955: Clarification of

Jan-Henrik: I'm e-mailing you to see if you would be willing to clean up the following problem with the licensing of mmail and mmake (and any other packages) that you've intended to license under the GPL, but didn't make it perfectly clear. If you would be willing to okay the second copyright state

Bug#220093: marked as done (39 packages unnecessarily still use "Bugs: debbugs://bugs.debian.org")

Your message dated Tue, 17 Aug 2004 07:32:16 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#220093: fixed in varmon 1.0.2-5 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now you

Bug#225765: marked as done (varmon doesn't work with devfs)

Your message dated Tue, 17 Aug 2004 07:32:16 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#225765: fixed in varmon 1.0.2-5 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now you

Bug#266285: elza: README.Debian suggests 'libnet-socks-perl' which is not in sid

Package: elza Version: 1.4.3-5 Severity: minor [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/share/doc/elza$ grep libnet README.Debian * libnet-socks-perl is required for SOCKS proxy support libnet-socks-perl is not in sid. -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstab

Processing of gtktalog_1.0.4-2_i386.changes

gtktalog_1.0.4-2_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: gtktalog_1.0.4-2.dsc gtktalog_1.0.4-2.diff.gz gtktalog_1.0.4-2_i386.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon

gtktalog_1.0.4-2_i386.changes ACCEPTED

Accepted: gtktalog_1.0.4-2.diff.gz to pool/main/g/gtktalog/gtktalog_1.0.4-2.diff.gz gtktalog_1.0.4-2.dsc to pool/main/g/gtktalog/gtktalog_1.0.4-2.dsc gtktalog_1.0.4-2_i386.deb to pool/main/g/gtktalog/gtktalog_1.0.4-2_i386.deb Announcing to debian-devel-changes@lists.debian.org Thank you fo

Bug#266329: asks at high priority about configuring, but follows with medium proority questions

Package: atftpd Version: 0.6.3 Severity: normal The debconf config script asks at high priority whether to configure atftpd with debconf. If you choose to do so, it asks all the config questions at medium priority. The result is that if it's installed at high priority, it asks if you want to confi

Processed: severity of 224137 is critical

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.1 > severity 224137 critical Bug#224137: varmon: Fails to run with 2.6.0-test11 Severity set to `critical'. > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assi

Processed: tagging 224137

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.1 > tags 224137 help Bug#224137: varmon: Fails to run with 2.6.0-test11 There were no tags set. Tags added: help > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need

Bug#255955: Accepted mmake 2.2.1-4 (all source)

Hello On Tue, Aug 17, 2004 at 01:56:56AM -0700, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote: > reopen 255955 > thanks > > Ola Lundqvist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > Description: > > mmake - Makefile generator for Java programs > > Closes: 199875 216534 255955 > > Changes: > > mmake (2.2.1-4) unstabl

Bug#211307: marked as done (libapache-mod-fastcgi: request; build for apache2)

Your message dated Wed, 18 Aug 2004 03:59:47 +0900 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line done by myself. has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to

Cheapest Ph@rmacy Here nBMN

Packages The Best 0n|ine Phar-macy is here. Why pay m0re when you can enjoy at a specia| disc0unt? -Cia|is -Via-gra -Vi0xx -S0ma and many many more! Visit Us t0day! http://www.worldwidemedstoday.com?wid=18 This 0ne-time mai-|ing. N0 re m0val are requ|red H[20

Bug#255955: Clarification of

Don Armstrong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > My original bug was that debian/copyright didn't actually include the > following (I was auditing packages for something wolse when I ran > across this.) > >COPYRIGHT GNUGPL (c) 1998-2001 Jan-Henrik Haukeland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >Redistributi

Bug#246486: attempts to fix

It turns out that fixing this bug is not trivial; it is merely one of a whole host of problems that are caused because apparently swig has changed its interface in a variety of ways. Adapting to the changes seems easy on the assumption that you understand swig, but I don't. Perhaps version 2.0.1

Gay Chat Subscription

This email has been sent to confirm that [EMAIL PROTECTED] has been subscribed to UK GAY CHAT. Soon you will receive messages and pictures from other users and can even get kinky using your microphone and webcam! We hope you enjoy this exciting new service. To unsubscribe, at any time, please

Bug#249777: marked as done (semi: prevents gnus-bonus-el package from configuring)

Your message dated 17 Aug 2004 17:19:43 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line unreproducable has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen

Processing of gwrapguile_1.3.4-12_powerpc.changes

gwrapguile_1.3.4-12_powerpc.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: gwrapguile_1.3.4-12.dsc gwrapguile_1.3.4-12.diff.gz libgwrapguile1_1.3.4-12_powerpc.deb libgwrapguile-dev_1.3.4-12_powerpc.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon

Processing of libofx_0.6.6-2_powerpc.changes

libofx_0.6.6-2_powerpc.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: libofx_0.6.6-2.dsc libofx_0.6.6-2.diff.gz libofx0c102_0.6.6-2_powerpc.deb libofx-dev_0.6.6-2_powerpc.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon

gwrapguile_1.3.4-12_powerpc.changes ACCEPTED

Accepted: gwrapguile_1.3.4-12.diff.gz to pool/main/g/gwrapguile/gwrapguile_1.3.4-12.diff.gz gwrapguile_1.3.4-12.dsc to pool/main/g/gwrapguile/gwrapguile_1.3.4-12.dsc libgwrapguile-dev_1.3.4-12_powerpc.deb to pool/main/g/gwrapguile/libgwrapguile-dev_1.3.4-12_powerpc.deb libgwrapguile1_1.3.4-1

libofx_0.6.6-2_powerpc.changes ACCEPTED

Accepted: libofx-dev_0.6.6-2_powerpc.deb to pool/main/libo/libofx/libofx-dev_0.6.6-2_powerpc.deb libofx0c102_0.6.6-2_powerpc.deb to pool/main/libo/libofx/libofx0c102_0.6.6-2_powerpc.deb libofx_0.6.6-2.diff.gz to pool/main/libo/libofx/libofx_0.6.6-2.diff.gz libofx_0.6.6-2.dsc to pool/main/l