Your message dated 07 Aug 2004 22:04:19 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line bug in xtrlock
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 249777 + unreproducible
Bug#249777: semi: prevents gnus-bonus-el package from configuring
There were no tags set.
Tags added: unreproducible
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system
I have just done the following with no problems:
# apt-get remove gnus-bonus-el gnus
# apt-get install semi wl t-gnus
# apt-get install gnus-bonus-el
with no errors at all.
Perhaps this was fixed in a release after the one you have installed
(which appears to be 1.14.6+0.20040).
Can you try wi
Are you still planning to take over maintenance of the Debian
"roleplaying" package? On May 25 you said you were planning to start
working on it.
If you no longer intend to adopt the package, please change its status
back to orphaned (I would be happy to do that for you if you like).
If you d
Hi,
this version contains corrected czech messages for lirc.
Regards
Miroslav Jezbera
#
#Translators, if you are not familiar with the PO format, gettext
#documentation is worth reading, especially sec
Hi,
I've no idea to whom I should send this patch nor the procedure for doing so,
but when I compiled
bblaunch on Red Hat 8, it ran fine, but on Fedora Core 2, it kept segfaulting
(no core dump).
I tracked down the problem to a bad cast and, as it turns out, the variable in
question wasn't
eve
Your message dated 08 Aug 2004 15:13:21 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line already fixed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen
Your message dated 08 Aug 2004 15:16:01 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line was accepted
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen t
Your message dated Sun, 08 Aug 2004 18:32:02 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#227387: fixed in libarr 0.1-52
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated 08 Aug 2004 15:30:48 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line libctk3-dev appears to depend on libctk-dev
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated 08 Aug 2004 15:43:44 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line accepted by maintainer already
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsi
Package: bblaunch
Version: 0.0.3-5
Any attempt to run bblaunch on Fedora Core 2 under Fluxbox results in
"Segmentation fault" with no
core file. This behavior is consistent regardless of arguments used.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] .backups]# uname -a
Linux tomis 2.6.5-1.358.8kstacks #1 Sat May 22 21:46
> Package: libguppi15
> Version: 0.40.2-7
> Severity: important
>
> On debian ppc sid, I find that guppi-gnumeric crashes when
> I try to do the following.
>
> 1) run gnumeric
> 2) enter two columns of three rows of numbers (1,2,3 and 2,4,6)
> 3) select these six cells
> 4) click on the graph ic
libarr_0.1-52_powerpc.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
libarr_0.1-52.dsc
libarr_0.1-52.tar.gz
libarr-dev_0.1-52_powerpc.deb
libarr0_0.1-52_powerpc.deb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
Your message dated 08 Aug 2004 16:21:08 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line already fixed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen
Your message dated 08 Aug 2004 16:23:54 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line fixed long ago
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen
Your message dated 08 Aug 2004 16:24:53 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line long fixed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Accepted:
libarr-dev_0.1-52_powerpc.deb
to pool/main/liba/libarr/libarr-dev_0.1-52_powerpc.deb
libarr0_0.1-52_powerpc.deb
to pool/main/liba/libarr/libarr0_0.1-52_powerpc.deb
libarr_0.1-52.dsc
to pool/main/liba/libarr/libarr_0.1-52.dsc
libarr_0.1-52.tar.gz
to pool/main/liba/libarr/libarr_0.
libctk_3.0.24.5_powerpc.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
libctk_3.0.24.5.dsc
libctk_3.0.24.5.tar.gz
libctk3_3.0.24.5_powerpc.deb
libctk3-dev_3.0.24.5_powerpc.deb
libctk-dev_3.0.24.5_powerpc.deb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
Accepted:
libctk-dev_3.0.24.5_powerpc.deb
to pool/main/libc/libctk/libctk-dev_3.0.24.5_powerpc.deb
libctk3-dev_3.0.24.5_powerpc.deb
to pool/main/libc/libctk/libctk3-dev_3.0.24.5_powerpc.deb
libctk3_3.0.24.5_powerpc.deb
to pool/main/libc/libctk/libctk3_3.0.24.5_powerpc.deb
libctk_3.0.24.5.dsc
Your message dated 08 Aug 2004 16:35:33 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line [Mail Delivery System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>] Mail delivery
failed: returning message to sender
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has b
> As an ipaq user, I know that xkbd isn't really intended for normal
> window managers, but I actually have a real need for it on a real WM on
> x86 architecture so I'm reporting this as a bug.
>
> xkbd under sawfish-gnome 1.0.1.20020116-4 doesn't do a darn thing. It
> puts up its keyboard wind
Does this problem still happen for you? I cannot reproduce it on my
system, and before I try to investigate further, can you confirm that
it is still a problem?
> Package: gnucash
> Version: 1.8.9-2
> Severity: grave
> Justification: renders package unusable
>
> Hi all,
>
> I have checked othe
Package: filerunner
Version: 2.5.1-14
Severity: normal
I'd just re-open # 190927, which was my own bug, but you can't re-open
an archived bug, apparently. Fooey on me for not paying attention when
someone closed it without fixing it.
Regarding the comment at the end of that bug... the alternativ
Рады предложить Вам прекрасный и беспроигрышный путь преобразить свое тело,
подтянуть мыжцы бедер и ягодиц
улучшить форму тела, убрать целлюлит !
Спецпредложение ! Бесплатная доставка всем! Подробности на нашем сайте:
http://www.pokupki.net
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> owner 245635 !
Bug#245635: rdiff-backup can't backup files larger than 2GB incrementally
Owner recorded as Alec Berryman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>.
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking sy
Your message dated Mon, 09 Aug 2004 00:39:01 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
has caused the Debian Bug report #245635,
regarding rdiff-backup can't backup files larger than 2GB incrementally
to be marked as having been forwarded to the upstream software
author(s) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
(NB: I
27 matches
Mail list logo
