Your message dated 08 Aug 2004 16:35:33 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line [Mail Delivery System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>] Mail delivery 
failed: returning message to sender
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 28 Jun 2002 23:12:07 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Jun 28 18:12:07 2002
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from grib.customer.jump.net (firewall.linuxdevelopersgroup.com) 
[216.30.103.2] 
        by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
        id 17O4uN-0006tY-00; Fri, 28 Jun 2002 18:12:07 -0500
Received: from localhost.localdomain (unknown [192.168.0.5])
        by firewall.linuxdevelopersgroup.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E59DFF3
        for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Fri, 28 Jun 2002 18:12:05 -0500 (CDT)
Subject: xkbd doesn't work with sawfish
From: Bill Gribble <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.0.7 
Date: 28 Jun 2002 18:12:05 -0500
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Package: xkbd
Version: 0.7.1-5
Severity: important

As an ipaq user, I know that xkbd isn't really intended for normal
window managers, but I actually have a real need for it on a real WM on
x86 architecture so I'm reporting this as a bug. 

xkbd under sawfish-gnome 1.0.1.20020116-4 doesn't do a darn thing.  It
puts up its keyboard window but clicks on the keys don't send keypresses
to the focus window.  If focus is set to click-to-focus, xkbd's window
actually takes focus when you click on a key. 

b.g.



---------------------------------------
Received: (at 151319-done) by bugs.debian.org; 8 Aug 2004 23:35:34 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Aug 08 16:35:33 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from vp085189.reshsg.uci.edu (becket.becket.net) [128.195.85.189] 
        by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
        id 1BtxCP-0003tf-00; Sun, 08 Aug 2004 16:35:33 -0700
Received: from tb by becket.becket.net with local (Exim 4.34)
        id 1BtxCP-0002Q6-LK
        for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sun, 08 Aug 2004 16:35:33 -0700
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Mail Delivery System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>] Mail delivery failed: 
returning message to sender
X-Reply-Permission: Posted or emailed replies to this message constitute
                 permission for an emailed response.
X-PGP-Fingerprint: 1F0A1E51  63 28 EB DA E6 44 E5 5E  EC F3 04 26 4E BF 1A 92
X-Zippy-Says: 
   If this is the DATING GAME I want to know your FAVORITE PLANET!  Do I
   get th' MICROWAVE MOPED?
From: Thomas Bushnell BSG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: 08 Aug 2004 16:35:33 -0700
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Lines: 68
User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: message/rfc822
Content-Disposition: inline
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.2 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_40 autolearn=no 
        version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level: 

X-From-Line: MAILER-DAEMON Sun Aug 08 16:32:53 2004
Return-path: <>
Envelope-to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Delivery-date: Sun, 08 Aug 2004 16:32:53 -0700
Received: from Debian-exim by becket.becket.net with local (Exim 4.34)
        id 1Btx9p-0002Pk-Kh     for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sun, 08 Aug 2004 
16:32:53 -0700
X-Failed-Recipients: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
From: Mail Delivery System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Mail delivery failed: returning message to sender
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sun, 08 Aug 2004 16:32:53 -0700
Lines: 48
Xref: becket.becket.net incoming.generic:289882
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii

This message was created automatically by mail delivery software.

A message that you sent could not be delivered to one or more of its
recipients. This is a permanent error. The following address(es) failed:

  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
    all relevant MX records point to non-existent hosts

------ This is a copy of the message, including all the headers. ------

Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from tb by becket.becket.net with local (Exim 4.34)
        id 1Btx9m-0002PM-TH; Sun, 08 Aug 2004 16:32:50 -0700
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: xkbd doesn't work with sawfish
X-Reply-Permission: Posted or emailed replies to this message constitute
                 permission for an emailed response.
X-PGP-Fingerprint: 1F0A1E51  63 28 EB DA E6 44 E5 5E  EC F3 04 26 4E BF 1A 92
X-Zippy-Says: 
   ..  I don't know why but, suddenly, I want to discuss declining I.Q.
   LEVELS with a blue ribbon SENATE SUB-COMMITTEE!
From: Thomas Bushnell BSG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: 08 Aug 2004 16:32:50 -0700
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Lines: 17
User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii


> As an ipaq user, I know that xkbd isn't really intended for normal
> window managers, but I actually have a real need for it on a real WM on
> x86 architecture so I'm reporting this as a bug. 
> 
> xkbd under sawfish-gnome 1.0.1.20020116-4 doesn't do a darn thing.  It
> puts up its keyboard window but clicks on the keys don't send keypresses
> to the focus window.  If focus is set to click-to-focus, xkbd's window
> actually takes focus when you click on a key. 

On current xkbd (0.8.5-2) and sawfish (1:1.3+cvs20040617-6), xkdb
works fine for me.  Can you see if it still fails for you, and let me
know so I can either work on the bug further or close it?

Many thanks.

Thomas (for the Debian QA team)

Reply via email to