Bug#130891: util-linux_2.11n-3 (unstable): fails to build

2002-01-26 Thread Bastian Blank
Package: util-linux Version: 2.11n-3 Severity: serious There was an error while trying to autobuild your package: > Automatic build of util-linux_2.11n-3 on ipmsun1 by sbuild/m68k 1.159 > Build started at 2002012

Bug#130802: gv: 'redisplay' is flaky

2002-01-26 Thread Christian Kesselheim
Salut! Some days ago, you've reported a bug with the "redisplay"-functionality in gv. Since it seems that i will adopt the package in the nearby future, it would be very helpfull to me to recieve an example postscript file concerning this problem from you. Currently, i've already fixed some of the

Bug#130891: old kernel

2002-01-26 Thread Torsten Landschoff
Hi *, In case anybody wonders about this bug - it seems like it is due to an old kernel on the build system. pivot_root is only built if the kernel supports the pivot_root syscall which was added in 2.3.something. So util-linux should depend on a newer kernel. Eh, and, btw, the include is probab

Bug#131044: mount: patch-int-2.4.17.0.gz vs mount_2.11n-2

2002-01-26 Thread Adrian Bunk
Package: mount Version: 2.11n-2 Severity: normal NAGY Andras <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> sent me the following: <-- snip --> Scenario: loop-hvr-2.4.16.0.patch and patch-int-2.4.17.0.gz applied to a 2.4.17 kernel. Mount package version 2.11n-2 installed from woody. loop, cryptoapi and cipher-aes (an

tkstep8.0 override disparity

2002-01-26 Thread Debian Installer
There are disparities between your recently installed upload and the override file for the following file(s): tkstep8.0_8.0.4p2-5_i386.deb: priority is overridden from optional to extra. tkstep8.0-dev_8.0.4p2-5_i386.deb: priority is overridden from optional to extra. Either the package or the ove

tkmail_4.0beta9-8_i386.changes INSTALLED

2002-01-26 Thread Debian Installer
Installing: tkmail_4.0beta9-8.diff.gz to pool/main/t/tkmail/tkmail_4.0beta9-8.diff.gz tkmail_4.0beta9-8.dsc to pool/main/t/tkmail/tkmail_4.0beta9-8.dsc tkmail_4.0beta9-8_i386.deb to pool/main/t/tkmail/tkmail_4.0beta9-8_i386.deb Announcing to debian-devel-changes@lists.debian.org Closing bugs

xwpe_1.5.26a-3_i386.changes INSTALLED

2002-01-26 Thread Debian Installer
Installing: xwpe_1.5.26a-3.diff.gz to pool/main/x/xwpe/xwpe_1.5.26a-3.diff.gz xwpe_1.5.26a-3.dsc to pool/main/x/xwpe/xwpe_1.5.26a-3.dsc xwpe_1.5.26a-3_i386.deb to pool/main/x/xwpe/xwpe_1.5.26a-3_i386.deb Announcing to debian-devel-changes@lists.debian.org Closing bugs: Thank you for your

plan_1.8.4-6_i386.changes INSTALLED

2002-01-26 Thread Debian Installer
Installing: netplan_1.8.4-6_i386.deb to pool/main/p/plan/netplan_1.8.4-6_i386.deb plan_1.8.4-6.diff.gz to pool/main/p/plan/plan_1.8.4-6.diff.gz plan_1.8.4-6.dsc to pool/main/p/plan/plan_1.8.4-6.dsc plan_1.8.4-6_i386.deb to pool/main/p/plan/plan_1.8.4-6_i386.deb Announcing to debian-devel-c

upsd_2.5-2_i386.changes INSTALLED

2002-01-26 Thread Debian Installer
Installing: upsd_2.5-2.diff.gz to pool/main/u/upsd/upsd_2.5-2.diff.gz upsd_2.5-2.dsc to pool/main/u/upsd/upsd_2.5-2.dsc upsd_2.5-2_i386.deb to pool/main/u/upsd/upsd_2.5-2_i386.deb Announcing to debian-devel-changes@lists.debian.org Closing bugs: Thank you for your contribution to Debian.

tkstep8.0_8.0.4p2-5_i386.changes INSTALLED

2002-01-26 Thread Debian Installer
Installing: tkstep8.0-dev_8.0.4p2-5_i386.deb to pool/main/t/tkstep8.0/tkstep8.0-dev_8.0.4p2-5_i386.deb tkstep8.0_8.0.4p2-5.diff.gz to pool/main/t/tkstep8.0/tkstep8.0_8.0.4p2-5.diff.gz tkstep8.0_8.0.4p2-5.dsc to pool/main/t/tkstep8.0/tkstep8.0_8.0.4p2-5.dsc tkstep8.0_8.0.4p2-5_i386.deb to p

Bug#119510: marked as done (annoying brink)

2002-01-26 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 26 Jan 2002 15:02:19 -0500 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#119510: fixed in lynx 2.8.4.1b-3 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now yo

Bug#129257: marked as done (patch: Patch is borken when built with fakeroot)

2002-01-26 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 26 Jan 2002 15:05:02 -0500 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#129257: fixed in patch 2.5.4-8 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#111285: patch: clisp on Alpha

2002-01-26 Thread Dr. David Alan Gilbert
Hi, The following patch lets clisp build on alpha (sid) as per the bug report 111285; I picked this bug up because it was marked 'help' and I have an Alpha. However before today I've never done any lisp and thus while it builds, seems to run and apparently does floating point square roots I can'

Bug#130891: util-linux RC bug

2002-01-26 Thread J.H.M. Dassen \(Ray\)
severity 130891 normal tags 130891 + moreinfo thanks I've verified that there are no differences between 2.11n-2 and 2.11n-3 which could conceivably affect building from source. 2.11n-2 was succesfully built by a buildd for m68k (see http://buildd.debian.org), so I concur with Torsten's assessmen

Processed: util-linux RC bug

2002-01-26 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 130891 normal Bug#130891: util-linux_2.11n-3 (unstable): fails to build Severity set to `normal'. > tags 130891 + moreinfo Bug#130891: util-linux_2.11n-3 (unstable): fails to build Tags added: moreinfo > thanks Stopping processing here. Plea

Bug#43799: marked as done (2.1r1 Install kills bsd- and other partitions)

2002-01-26 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 26 Jan 2002 14:46:05 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#437899: 2.1r1 Install kills bsd- and other partitions has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not

Bug#51376: marked as done (hwclock goes berserk!)

2002-01-26 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 26 Jan 2002 14:48:48 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#51376: hwclock goes berserk! has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your r

Bug#130891: util-linux RC bug

2002-01-26 Thread Bastian Blank
util-linux_2.11n-2_m68k log: | You have and openpty() | You have wide character support | You have __NR_pivot_root | You have a tm_gmtoff field in struct tm | Your rpcgen seems to work util-linux_2.11n-3_m68k log: | You have and openpty() | You have wide character support | You don't have __NR_p

Invalid Maintainer: of gqmpeg

2002-01-26 Thread Martin Michlmayr
gqmpeg has a maintainer of Debian QA Group Note the # instead of @. Can someone fix this? -- Martin Michlmayr [EMAIL PROTECTED]