Hi Paul
Thanks for uploading!
On 25 May 2013 17:47, Paul Gevers wrote:
> If we fixed the FTBFS, do you want to start filling wishlist bugs
> against the reverse dependencies of lesstif2-dev? (I am working on nedit
> already). Or do you want me to start them? If you do, please don't
> forget to
Hmm,
Maybe I was too quick, although I don't understand why it works now, but
kfreebsd now builds with motif 2.3.4, where it didn't build with
openmotif 2.3.3.
https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=motif&suite=sid
Paul
On 25-05-13 17:47, Paul Gevers wrote:
> Hi Graham,
>
> Congratulat
Hi Luca,
On 23-05-13 08:43, Luca Falavigna wrote:
> 2013/5/22 Paul Gevers :
>> Ok. Then we just have to wait until the RT grants us a transition slot.
>> Will keep you updated.
>
> I don't think we need it for openmotif -> motif, as long as motif is
> ABI-compatible with openmotf.
After the resp
[Summary of previous mails: we are discussing how/when to move openmotif
to motif].
On 23-05-13 08:43, Luca Falavigna wrote:
> 2013/5/22 Paul Gevers :
>> Ok. Then we just have to wait until the RT grants us a transition slot.
>> Will keep you updated.
>
> I don't think we need it for openmotif ->
As per the motif 2.3.4 release notes [1], motif 2.3.4 is binary compatible
all the way back to motif 2.2.
I believe this means bug #587683 [2] should have been solved by symlinks
rather than bumping the name libmotif3 to libmotif4.
I cannot say why upstream bumped the soname when it was not necessa
2013/5/22 Paul Gevers :
> Ok. Then we just have to wait until the RT grants us a transition slot.
> Will keep you updated.
I don't think we need it for openmotif -> motif, as long as motif is
ABI-compatible with openmotf.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-packages-requ...@lists.debian.org
w
On 20-05-13 11:55, Luca Falavigna wrote:
> I just checked, openmotif has only two rdeps, all of them in non-free,
> and just for i386 and amd64 architectures. I don't think removing
> openmotif from non-free and immediately accepting motif in main would
> cause a lot of trouble for those two packag
2013/5/20 Paul Gevers :
> I don't understand exactly what you mean here. Do you mean "don't
> usually pick packages from non-free"?
Yes, lack of caffeine is a serious bug :)
I just checked, openmotif has only two rdeps, all of them in non-free,
and just for i386 and amd64 architectures. I don't t
Hi Luca,
[What would be the appropriate mail-list or bug-tracker for this
discussion to happen in the open? Should I add it to the transition bug?]
On 20-05-13 09:03, Luca Falavigna wrote:
> 2013/5/18 Paul Gevers :
>> While we are waiting for the release team to respond to my questions
>> about t
Hi Paul,
2013/5/18 Paul Gevers :
> While we are waiting for the release team to respond to my questions
> about the transition from lesstif2 to motif [1], I am considering to
> have the motif package updated in non-free first.
I don't think that would work because autobuilders don't usually pick
Hi Luca
On 06-05-13 00:22, Luca Falavigna wrote:
> 2013/5/5 Paul Gevers :
>> As the release of wheezy has happened this weekend. Is it now a good
>> time to follow up on the actions above?
>
> It should, yes.
> Feel free to upload motif to unstable, then I'll take care of removing
> openmotif fro
2013/5/5 Paul Gevers :
> As the release of wheezy has happened this weekend. Is it now a good
> time to follow up on the actions above?
It should, yes.
Feel free to upload motif to unstable, then I'll take care of removing
openmotif from the archive just before processing motif from NEW.
--
To
Hi Luca,
On 06-04-13 00:59, Luca Falavigna wrote:
> There's a nasty bug in dak, which prevents accepting a package if
> components are already available in a different section, as happened
> with motif, which shares libmotif-dev and libmotif4 with openmotif
> package.
>
> The workaround for this
Hi,
On 06-04-13 14:30, Graham Inggs wrote:
> I think it is very late now to try and get motif into Raring with it not
> being in Debian.
Get it, and thought so.
> Paul: when you re-upload motif in NEW, will you go straight to 2.3.4-2,
> or upload 2.3.4-1 again?
> (or just to mix things up, uploa
14 matches
Mail list logo
