Hi Luca On 06-05-13 00:22, Luca Falavigna wrote: > 2013/5/5 Paul Gevers <elb...@debian.org>: >> As the release of wheezy has happened this weekend. Is it now a good >> time to follow up on the actions above? > > It should, yes. > Feel free to upload motif to unstable, then I'll take care of removing > openmotif from the archive just before processing motif from NEW.
While we are waiting for the release team to respond to my questions about the transition from lesstif2 to motif [1], I am considering to have the motif package updated in non-free first. That way we already have the name change and additional packages done, albeit in non-free. We can migrate the package to main when the real transition can start. This way, packages that build-depend on libmotif-dev can start trying out with the updated package from non-free, while we can not provide the updated package now. What do you think? Does this work for you, or does it just mean a lot more manual action? I considered having the new package in experimental first, but I remember you saying that the old package needs to be removed from unstable/non-free and we do have two build depends there. Paul [1] http://bugs.debian.org/708462
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
