Bug#521107: s-p-u: security update for xfs package

2009-11-30 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Wed, 2009-11-18 at 01:25 -0300, Luciano Bello wrote: > El Mar 17 Nov 2009, Adam D. Barratt escribió: > > >From a stable-update point-of-view, I'd also prefer that it was fixed in > > > > unstable first. It's a lot easier to fix sid if any unforeseen problems > > arise. :) > > So, I made the QA

Bug#521107: s-p-u: security update for xfs package

2009-11-17 Thread Luciano Bello
El Mar 17 Nov 2009, Adam D. Barratt escribió: > >From a stable-update point-of-view, I'd also prefer that it was fixed in > > unstable first.  It's a lot easier to fix sid if any unforeseen problems > arise. :) So, I made the QA upload few minutes ago. luciano -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debia

Bug#521107: s-p-u: security update for xfs package

2009-11-17 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Tue, 2009-11-17 at 21:02 +0100, Julien Cristau wrote: > On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 19:10:01 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > > >From reading the bug log for #521107, it appears that the maintainer > > disagrees either that there is an issue which requires fixing, or with > > the proposed fix (which

Bug#521107: s-p-u: security update for xfs package

2009-11-17 Thread Julien Cristau
On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 19:10:01 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > Hi, > > On Tue, 2009-11-10 at 17:16 -0300, Luciano Bello wrote: > > (CC is appreciated. I'm not following this list) > > > > Hey there, > > I would like to upload a new xfs package to stable in order to fix a > > the > > sec