Package: binfmtc
Version: 0.17-3
Severity: serious
Justification: fails to install
Hi,
I just saw this on one of my hosts:
$ sudo apt install -f
Summary:
Upgrading: 0, Installing: 0, Removing: 0, Not Upgrading: 427
1 not fully installed or removed.
Space needed: 0 B / 140 GB available
Se
Hi,
On 24-04-2025 15:35, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
On 24/04/25 at 14:38 +0200, Paul Gevers wrote:
Hi,
On 24-04-2025 13:56, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
ruby-shoulda-context was updated and no longer build-depends on
ruby-pry-byebug. So ruby-pry-byebug could be removed (once
ruby-shoulda-context
Hi,
On 24-04-2025 13:56, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
ruby-shoulda-context was updated and no longer build-depends on
ruby-pry-byebug. So ruby-pry-byebug could be removed (once
ruby-shoulda-context migrates).
ruby-shoulda-context fails its own autopkgtest everywhere.
Paul
OpenPGP_signature.asc
D
Hi,
On Sat, 12 Apr 2025 00:58:12 +0530 Pirate Praveen
wrote:
> Since ruby-shoulda-context Build-Depends ruby-pry-byebug this also
> affects #1054740.
I tried to update to new upstream version which has a fix for this, but
this needs ruby-byebug updated from 11 to 12.
What's the progress he
Hi javascript maintainers,
On Fri, 10 Jan 2025 14:41:12 +0100 Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> Alternatively I'd look into removing it from testing, however there's a few
> rdeps that look hard to remove.
Which "it" are you talking about removing from testing?
emscript, and as a consequence all it
Source: tardy
Version: 1.25-3
Severity: serious
Control: close -1 1.28-1
Tags: sid trixie
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: out-of-sync
Dear maintainer(s),
The Release Team considers packages that are out-of-sync between testing
and unstable for more than 30 days as having
Source: dadadodo
Version: 1.04-9
Severity: serious
Control: close -1 1.04-10
Tags: sid trixie
X-Debbugs-CC: Thiago Cardoso Caetano
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: out-of-sync
Dear maintainer(s),
The Release Team considers packages that are out-of-sync between testing
and
Hi Julian,
On 10/14/24 20:58, Julian Gilbey wrote:
(3) Compatibility issues: As discussed, the version of emscripten is
closely tied to the versions of LLVM and binaryen, and not necessarily
in a reliable way. I suggest that we add some sort of script in
debian/, that is called from both uscan
Source: emscripten
Version: 3.1.6~dfsg-9
Severity: serious
Control: close -1 3.1.66~dfsg-2
Tags: sid trixie
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: out-of-sync
Dear maintainer(s),
The Release Team considers packages that are out-of-sync between testing
and unstable for more than
Source: gnubg
Version: 1.07.001-3
Severity: serious
Control: close -1 1.08.003-1
Tags: sid trixie
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: out-of-sync
Dear maintainer(s),
The Release Team considers packages that are out-of-sync between testing
and unstable for more than 30 days as
Hi Julian,
On 30-09-2024 08:53, Julian Gilbey wrote:
I've done a lot of cleaning of the source package, and fixed a lot of
lintian issues (though I haven't pushed anything to salsa yet).
Thanks for doing this work. Could you maybe push a branch (such that
others can follow and (who knows) may
Hi,
On 19-09-2024 18:49, Julian Gilbey wrote:
Ah! That would work. But I've now found the source of the problem,
and have a suggestion for how to fix it. Shall I commit directly to
the emscripten salsa repo?
emscripten is QA maintained, so if you feel like you can responsibly
change the pa
Hi,
On Mon, 16 Sep 2024 21:44:50 +0100 Julian Gilbey wrote:
Possible solutions:
(1) Rename this (and presumably the other Python scripts in the same
directory) without the '.py' suffix.
(2) If the '.py' suffix is needed for other contexts, have a symlink
to them without the '.py' suffix.
(3
Hi,
On 15-06-2024 11:38 p.m., Colin Watson wrote:
This was fixed by transaction 4.0-2, and it looks like either you
cancelled your upload or it was automatically dropped from the DELAYED
queue.
I cancelled my upload once I spotted 4.0-2.
Paul
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digit
Source: transaction
Version: 3.0.0-1
Severity: serious
Control: close -1 4.0-1
X-Debugs-CC: alexandre.deti...@gmail.com
Tags: sid trixie pending
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: out-of-sync
Dear maintainer(s),
The Release Team considers packages that are out-of-sync between
Source: gnome-shell-mailnag
Version: 40.0-5
Severity: serious
Control: close -1 40.0-7
Tags: sid trixie
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: out-of-sync
Dear maintainer(s),
The Release Team considers packages that are out-of-sync between testing
and unstable for more than 30 d
Source: pmacct
Version: 1.7.7-1
Severity: serious
Control: close -1 1.7.8-1
X-Debbugs-CC: Boyuan Yang
Tags: sid trixie
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: out-of-sync
Dear maintainer(s),
The Release Team considers packages that are out-of-sync between testing
and unstable fo
Source: pyocd
Version: 0.13.1+dfsg-3
Severity: serious
Control: close -1 0.36.0-1
X-Debbugs-CC: Alexandre Detiste
Tags: sid trixie
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: out-of-sync
Dear maintainer(s),
The Release Team considers packages that are out-of-sync between testing
and
Source: zope.proxy
Version: 4.5.0-1
Severity: serious
Control: close -1 5.1-2
Tags: sid trixie
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: out-of-sync
Dear maintainer(s),
The Release Team considers packages that are out-of-sync between testing
and unstable for more than 30 days as ha
Source: gpsim-doc
Version: 0.22.0-2.2
Severity: serious
Control: close -1 0.22.0-3
X-Debbugs-CC: b...@debian.org
Tags: sid trixie ftbfs
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: out-of-sync
Dear maintainer(s),
The Release Team considers packages that are out-of-sync between testing
Source: adequate
Version: 0.15.7
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: fails-always
Dear maintainer(s),
Your package has an autopkgtest, great. However, it fails on all
architectures but amd64. Can you please investigate the situation and
fix it? I copied some of the out
Hi Markus,
On 25-05-2023 23:47, Markus Koschany wrote:
Since I could not find a targeted fix I decided to remove the dependency on
rhino 1.7.14 and embedded rhino 1.7.7.2 instead, the last version that worked
well for closure-compiler.
I have rebuilt all reverse-dependencies and this would re
Source: xchain
Version: 1.0.1-10
Severity: serious
Tags: bookworm-ignore
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: fails-always
Dear maintainer(s),
Your package has an autopkgtest, great. However, it fails. Can you
please investigate the situation and fix it? I copied some of the output
at th
Source: zc.buildout
Version: 2.13.2-4
Severity: serious
Tags: bookworm-ignore
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: fails-always
Dear maintainer(s),
Your package has an autopkgtest, great. However, it fails. Can you
please investigate the situation and fix it? I copied some of the output
Control: tags -1 d-i
Hi Bastian, Guilhem,
On 16-03-2023 13:44, Paul Gevers wrote:
cryptsetup will need to migrate to mitigate the time bomb.
Ack.
As I already mentioned on this or some related bug, I would find it
nice for #1014110 to be fixed in bookworm (threaded argon2 executable)
but
Hi,
[@aurel32, glibc question at the bottom]
On 16-03-2023 11:57, Bastian Germann wrote:
Am 16.03.23 um 09:13 schrieb Paul Gevers:
I'm not 100% sure I parse that sentence as you intended, so let me ask
explicitly: if we binNMU (now or in the future) src:argon2 version
0~20171227-0
Hi Guilhem,
On 16-03-2023 14:31, Guilhem Moulin wrote:
cryptsetup can only migrate when argon2 migrates,
I see that in the excuse page now but don't understand the reason why,
It took me a while and the help of colleagues, but it's
libcryptsetup12-udeb that has:
Depends: libargon2-1-udeb (
Hi all,
On 15-03-2023 23:28, Guilhem Moulin wrote:
On Wed, 15 Mar 2023 at 22:43:31 +0100, Bastian Germann wrote:
Am 15.03.23 um 22:39 schrieb Paul Gevers:
Do I understand correctly that:
1) argon2 in testing isn't affected
2) this bug isn't solved yet, despite the closure?
3) the
Hi,
[Release Team here]
On Thu, 2 Mar 2023 18:42:56 +0100 Bastian Germann wrote:
On Thu, 2 Mar 2023 05:10:41 +0100 Guilhem Moulin wrote:
> Ah no my bad, the changelog entry is probably incorrect and the
> cryptsetup-initramfs breakage is caused by the recent libargon2 upload
> indeed, but AFA
Source: x-loader
Version: 1.5.1+git20110715+fca7cd2-2
Severity: serious
Control: close -1 1.5.1+git20110715+fca7cd2-3
X-Debbugs-CC: Marcos Talau
Tags: sid bookworm
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: out-of-sync
Control: block -1 by 1026364
Dear maintainer(s),
The Release Tea
Control: reassign -1 python3-nose
Control: tags -1 ftbfs patch pending upstream
Control: tags -1 - bookworm sid
Control: merge 1024235 -1
Control: affects -1 src:python-bayespy
Hi Håvard,
On 01-12-2022 19:16, Håvard F. Aasen wrote:
File "/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/nose/util.py", line 45
Source: zope.exceptions
Version: 4.5-1
Severity: serious
Tags: sid bookworm
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: needs-update
User: debian-pyt...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: python3.11
Control: affects -1 src:python3-defaults
Dear maintainer(s),
We are in the transition of adding python3.11
Source: python-bayespy
Version: 0.5.22-2
Severity: serious
Tags: sid bookworm
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: needs-update
User: debian-pyt...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: python3.11
Control: affects -1 src:python3-defaults
Dear maintainer(s),
We are in the transition of adding python3.
Source: guilt
Version: 0.36-2
Severity: serious
X-Debbugs-CC: g...@packages.debian.org
Tags: sid bookworm
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: needs-update
Control: affects -1 src:git
Dear maintainer(s),
With a recent upload of git the autopkgtest of guilt fails in testing
when that autop
Source: git-remote-hg
Version: 1.0.3.2~ds-2
Severity: serious
X-Debbugs-CC: g...@packages.debian.org
Tags: sid bookworm
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: needs-update
Control: affects -1 src:git
Dear maintainer(s),
With a recent upload of git the autopkgtest of git-remote-hg fails in
t
Source: libowfat
Version: 0.30-4
Severity: serious
Control: close -1 0.32-3
Tags: sid bookworm
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: out-of-sync
Control: block -1 by 1014120
Dear maintainer(s),
The Release Team considers packages that are out-of-sync between testing
and unstabl
Source: poc-streamer
Version: 0.4.2-5
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: flaky timeout
Dear maintainer(s),
I looked at the results of the autopkgtest of you package because it was
showing up on our "slow" page [1]. I noticed that there were several
runs that took 8:21
Package: dradio
Version: 3.8-2
Tags: sid bookworm
Severity: serious
Control: clone -1 -2 -3 -4
Control: reassign -2 qwinff 0.2.1+git20201215-1
Control: reassign -3 vdr-plugin-mp3 0.10.4-2
Control: reassign -4 videotrans 1.6.1-8
Dear maintainer,
Your package Depends on mplayer, which currently is
Source: directfb
Version: 1.7.7-9
Severity: serious
X-Debbugs-CC: Andreas Beckmann
Control: close -1 1.7.7-10
Tags: sid bookworm
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: out-of-sync
Dear maintainer(s), Andreas,
The Release Team considers packages that are out-of-sync between testi
Source: python-svg.path
Version: 6.0-1
Severity: serious
X-Debbugs-CC: by...@debian.org
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: regression
Dear maintainer(s),
With a recent upload of python-svg.path the autopkgtest of
python-svg.path fails in testing when that autopkgtest is run with the
bi
Dear Boyuan,
On 25-04-2022 20:44, Sudip Mukherjee wrote:
+unar (1.10.1-3) unstable; urgency=medium
+
+ * QA upload.
+ * Orphan the package (take over package maintenance) via
+ITS process. (Closes: #1008569)
I maybe wrong but I was wondering if this is correct.
Section 5.12 in Debian's
Source: zope.testing
Version: 4.9-1
Severity: serious
Tags: sid bookworm
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: needs-update
User: debian-pyt...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: python3.10
Control: affects -1 src:python3-defaults
Dear maintainer(s),
We are in the transition of making python3.10 th
Source: httpbin
Version: 0.5.0+dfsg-4
Severity: serious
Control: close -1 0.7.0+dfsg-1
Tags: sid bookworm
X-Debbugs-CC: a...@debian.org
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: out-of-sync
Dear maintainer(s),
The Release Team considers packages that are out-of-sync between testing
Hi Eriberto,
On Tue, 2 Nov 2021 19:57:37 -0300 Eriberto wrote:
> ow, Marcos will package the new upstream
> release and he will fix this mistake. In a final action, he will send
> a SPU to fix a specific issue.
Please be aware that grepmail will be removed from testing in 7 days if
the issue isn
Hi Eriberto,
On Tue, 2 Nov 2021 19:57:37 -0300 Eriberto wrote:
> Thanks a lot Paul.
Please be aware that in the BTS bug submitters normally don't get mails
to the bugs they submit (unless they are subscribed). It's coincidence
that I see your message.
> Really, in our machines the package is bu
Source: grepmail
X-Debbugs-Cc: mar...@talau.info, eribe...@debian.org
Version: 5.3104-1
Severity: serious
Justification: RC policy
Dear Marcos, Joao,
I appreciate your attention to the orphaned package grepmail and the
fact that you try to save it from removal from testing, but in the
process you
Source: golang-github-siddontang-go-snappy
Version: 0.0~git20140704.0.d8f7bb8-5
Severity: serious
Control: close -1 0.0~git20140704.0.d8f7bb8-6
X-Debbugs-CC: jel...@debian.org
Tags: sid bookworm pending
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: out-of-sync
Dear maintainer(s),
The Rel
Source: golang-github-go-xorm-builder
Version: 0.3.3-2
Severity: serious
Control: close -1 0.3.3-3
X-Debbugs-CC: jel...@debian.org
Tags: sid bookworm pending
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: out-of-sync
Dear maintainer(s),
The Release Team considers packages that are out-of-
Source: httpbin
Version: 0.7.0+dfsg-1
X-Debbugs-CC: debian...@lists.debian.org
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: regression
Dear maintainer(s),
With a recent upload of httpbin the autopkgtest of httpbin fails in
testing when that autopkgtest is run with the binary packa
Source: grepmail
Version: 5.3104-1
Severity: serious
Control: close -1 5.3104-2
X-Debbugs-CC: jel...@debian.org
Tags: sid bookworm pending
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: out-of-sync
Dear maintainer(s),
The Release Team considers packages that are out-of-sync between testin
Source: golang-github-go-macaron-i18n
Version: 0.0~git20160612.0.ef57533-7
Severity: serious
Control: close -1 0.0~git20160612.0.ef57533-8
X-Debbugs-CC: jel...@debian.org
Tags: sid bookworm pending
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: out-of-sync
Dear maintainer(s),
The Release
Source: aspell-hr
Version: 0.51-5
Severity: serious
Control: close -1 0.51-6
X-Debbugs-CC: jel...@debian.org
Tags: sid bookworm pending
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: out-of-sync
Dear maintainer(s),
The Release Team considers packages that are out-of-sync between testing
a
Source: xdemorse
Version: 3.6.4-1
X-Debbugs-CC: debian...@lists.debian.org, mo...@debian.org
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: regression
Dear maintainer(s),
With a recent upload of xdemorse the autopkgtest of xdemorse fails in
testing when that autopkgtest is run with
Hi all,
For documentation, I log our IRC conversation here.
[20:24:27] elbrus et al: just in case you have already seen
santiago_ 's email: what's your thought on #959022
[20:24:38] [zwiebelbot] Debian#959022: cgroup-tools: does not work in
cgroup2 / unified hierarchy - https://bugs.debian.org/9
Hi,
On Thu, 18 Feb 2021 08:28:06 +0100 Paul Gevers wrote:
> shoogle has an autopkgtest, great. However, on i386 it fails more often
^^^ oops, that's what you get for reusing an old mail.
> I copied the output at the bottom of this report. Can you please look
> into it and
Source: 9base
Version: 1:6-10
Severity: serious
X-Debbugs-CC: debian...@lists.debian.org
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: flaky
Dear maintainer(s),
shoogle has an autopkgtest, great. However, on i386 it fails more often
than it passes [1].
Because the unstable-to-testing migration soft
Hi Mike,
All bugs have caused the packages to be on the list for autoremoval. It
seems there is one bug to be filed still, can you please do that?
Paul
elbrus@coccia:~$ dak rm --no-action -R --suite testing libappindicator
Will remove the following packages from testing:
gir1.2-appindicator-0.
Hi Mike,
On Wed, 15 Apr 2020 19:06:59 + Mike Gabriel
wrote:
> >> If you want to get this done for bullseye, please upgrade these bugs to
> >> serious. Autoremovals will take care of some of the packages. The rest will
> >> need manual fixes.
> >
> > I haven't done that. I think the severity o
Source: splint
Version: 1:3.1.2+dfsg-1
Severity: serious
Control: close -1 1:3.1.2+dfsg-2
X-Debbugs-CC: la...@debian.org
Tags: sid bullseye pending
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: out-of-sync
Dear maintainer(s),
As recently announced [1], the Release Team now considers pack
Source: link-grammar
Version: 5.7.0-3
Severity: serious
Control: close -1 5.8.0-1
X-Debbugs-CC: Masayuki Hatta
Tags: sid bullseye
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: out-of-sync
Dear maintainer(s),
As recently announced [1], the Release Team now considers packages that
are out
Source: xoreos-tools
Version: 0.0.5-1
Severity: serious
Control: close -1 0.0.5-2
Tags: sid bullseye
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: out-of-sync
Dear maintainer(s),
As recently announced [1], the Release Team now considers packages that
are out-of-sync between testing and u
Source: pwget
Version: 2016.1019+git75c6e3e-1
Severity: serious
Control: close -1 2016.1019+git75c6e3e-3
Tags: sid bullseye
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: out-of-sync
Control: block -1 by 961456
Dear maintainer(s),
As recently announced [1], the Release Team now considers
Source: gsutil
Version: 3.1-1
Severity: serious
Control: close -1 3.1-3
Tags: sid bullseye
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: out-of-sync
Control: block -1 by 961381
Dear maintainer(s),
As recently announced [1], the Release Team now considers packages that
are out-of-sync bet
Source: wav2cdr
Version: 2.3.4-2
Severity: serious
Control: close -1 2.3.4-3
Tags: sid bullseye
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: out-of-sync
Control: block -1 by 958578
X-Debbugs-CC: eribe...@debian.org
Dear maintainer(s),
As recently announced [1], the Release Team now cons
Source: odt2txt
Version: 0.5-3
X-Debbugs-CC: debian...@lists.debian.org
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: fails-always
Dear maintainer(s),
You recently added an autopkgtest to your package odt2txt, great.
However, it fails. Currently this failure is blocking the migrati
Source: idle3-tools
Version: 0.9.1-4
X-Debbugs-CC: debian...@lists.debian.org, leandrora...@debxp.org
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: regression
Dear maintainer(s),
With a recent upload of idle3-tools the autopkgtest of idle3-tools fails
in testing when that autopkgte
Source: pwget
Version: 2016.1019+git75c6e3e-3
X-Debbugs-CC: debian...@lists.debian.org, elimar.henri...@yahoo.com.br
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: regression
Dear maintainer(s),
With a recent upload of pwget the autopkgtest of pwget fails in testing
when that autopk
Source: ngetty
Version: 1.1-5
X-Debbugs-CC: debian...@lists.debian.org, guilherme@gmail.com
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: regression
Dear maintainer(s),
With a recent upload of ngetty the autopkgtest of ngetty fails in
testing when that autopkgtest is run with t
Source: gsutil
Version: 3.1-3
X-Debbugs-CC: debian...@lists.debian.org, leandrora...@debxp.org
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: fails-always
Dear maintainer(s),
You recently added an autopkgtest to your package gsutil, great.
However, it fails. Currently this failure i
Source: pev
Version: 0.80-4
X-Debbugs-CC: debian...@lists.debian.org
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: fails-always
Dear maintainer(s),
Your package pev has an autopkgtest, great. However, it fails. Can you
please investigate the situation and fix it? I copied some of t
Source: libpam-alreadyloggedin
Version: 0.3-6
Severity: serious
Control: close -1 0.3-8
Tags: sid bullseye
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: out-of-sync
Control: block -1 by 958224
Dear maintainer(s),
As recently announced [1], the Release Team now considers packages that
are
Source: wav2cdr
Version: 2.3.4-3
X-Debbugs-CC: debian...@lists.debian.org
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: fails-always
Dear maintainer(s),
With a recent upload of wav2cdr you added an autopkgtest, great. However
it fails on arm64. I copied some of the output at the bo
Source: libpam-alreadyloggedin
Version: 0.3-8
X-Debbugs-CC: debian...@lists.debian.org
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: regression
Dear maintainer(s),
With a recent upload of libpam-alreadyloggedin the autopkgtest of
libpam-alreadyloggedin fails in testing when that au
Source: dosage
Version: 2.15-2
Severity: serious
Control: fixed -1 2.15-3
Tags: sid bullseye pending
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: out-of-sync
Dear maintainer(s),
As recently announced [1], the Release Team now considers packages that
are out-of-sync between testing and u
reassign -9 squirrel3 3.1-7
reassign -10 ubuntu-packaging-guide 1.0.1
reassign -11 yade 2019.01a-2
thanks
On Sun, 28 Jul 2019 20:26:28 +0200 Paul Gevers wrote:
> Severity: serious
> Tags: ftbfs sid bullseye
>
> Recently the texlive-base package has stopped building the transitional
>
Hi Helmut,
[Adding the debian-ci team into the discussion]
On 18-02-2019 08:06, Helmut Grohne wrote:
>> autopkgtest [00:11:07]: test defconfig: [---
>> 2019-02-16 00:11:07: (configfile.c.1599) server.upload-dirs doesn't
>> exist: /var/cache/lighttpd/uploads
>> 2019-02-16 00:11
Source: lighttpd
Version: 1.4.53-2
X-Debbugs-CC: debian...@lists.debian.org
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: regression
Dear maintainers,
With a recent upload of lighttpd the autopkgtest of lighttpd fails in
testing when that autopkgtest is run with the binary packages of
lighttpd from
Source: pygresql
Version: 1:5.0.6-1
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: needs-update
Control: affects -1 src:python3-defaults
Dear maintainers,
With a recent upload of python3-defaults the autopkgtest of pygresql
fails in testing when that autopkgtest is run with the binary packages
of pyt
Control: tags -1 ftbfs
Control: severity -1 serious
Control: retitle -1 pytest-localserver: FTBFS & autopkgtest regression
On Thu, 25 Oct 2018 11:52:02 +0200 Paul Gevers wrote:
> With a recent upload of python3-defaults the autopkgtest of
> pytest-localserver fails in testing
Source: pytest-localserver
Version: 0.3.7-2
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: needs-update
Control: affects -1 src:python3-defaults
[X-Debbugs-CC: debian...@lists.debian.org,
python3-defau...@packages.debian.org]
Dear maintainers,
With a recent upload of python3-defaults the autopkgtest
Sending again to the new bug.
Forwarded Message
Subject: Re: Bug#876197: Removed package(s) from unstable
Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2018 15:01:35 +0200
From: Paul Gevers
To: Helio Loureiro
CC: Eriberto Mota
Dear Helio,
On 11-06-18 14:45, Helio Loureiro wrote:
> Is possible to k
Ping...
As a QA maintained package which is not going into the upcoming release
with a license issue open for 1.5 years, shouldn't this package be
removed from Debian?
Paul
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Hi all,
I just wanted to let you know that yesterday I uploaded a much improved
dbconfig-common package to unstable on which some of your packages
depend (see dd-list output below). I took over ownership of this package
some time ago from Sean Finney. Although I have extended the set of
regression
On 10-09-13 19:21, Thorsten Alteholz wrote:
> thanks alot for your info. Unfortunately the motif license is not the
> only hurdle to put cluster3 into main.
Clear.
> Anyway, if I understand you right, I just have to reupload the package
> to get everything straight with the motif update (so no ne
Control: reassign -1 motif
On 15-08-13 01:56, G.raud wrote:
> Having the OpenMotif manual pages in a separate package libmotif-doc instead
> of
> inside libmotif-dev would allow this new package not to conflict with any
> Lesstif
> packages; thus it would be possible to have some Motif manual pa
Control: tags -1 moreinfo
Control: retitle -1 emacspeak loops infinite on specific directory
Hi Tim,
Sorry for taking so long to respond to this bug, but the package
emacspeak was orphaned and just got a new maintainer.
On 24-02-07 12:04, Romain Francoise wrote:
> I believe that this is a bug in
On 10-06-13 22:32, Paul Gevers wrote:
> My findings:
> via (include/via.h): no diff
> xmhtml (include/XmHTML/XmHTML.h): ABI/API is not compatible
>
> I did not succeed with the others yet for different reasons.
> dx: I fail to configure it (not understood yet)
dx: (include/dx/
On 09-06-13 11:05, Paul Gevers wrote:
> On 04-06-13 08:31, Julien Cristau wrote:
>> Do we know how many of the lesstif2 reverse dependencies are libraries
>> whose ABI would change if rebuilt with motif instead?
>
> No, but I can try to find out. The original idea of lesstif
Hi Graham,
[Side note: maybe we can stop using the @packages.debian.org address, I
don't think anybody else is listening.]
On 25-05-13 21:08, Graham Inggs wrote:
> Thanks for uploading!
Thank you for the nice cooperation so far, it has been a pleasure.
> I will file the bugs against the reverse
Hmm,
Maybe I was too quick, although I don't understand why it works now, but
kfreebsd now builds with motif 2.3.4, where it didn't build with
openmotif 2.3.3.
https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=motif&suite=sid
Paul
On 25-05-13 17:47, Paul Gevers wrot
Hi Graham,
Congratulations...
Now that we have motif in Debian/main, I would like to fix the fact that
motif FTBFS on non-linux systems. That is needed if we want to replace
lesstif2 as that is now available on more Debian platforms than motif.
I think I know where it goes wrong (I have to check
Hi Luca,
On 23-05-13 08:43, Luca Falavigna wrote:
> 2013/5/22 Paul Gevers :
>> Ok. Then we just have to wait until the RT grants us a transition slot.
>> Will keep you updated.
>
> I don't think we need it for openmotif -> motif, as long as motif is
> ABI-comp
[Summary of previous mails: we are discussing how/when to move openmotif
to motif].
On 23-05-13 08:43, Luca Falavigna wrote:
> 2013/5/22 Paul Gevers :
>> Ok. Then we just have to wait until the RT grants us a transition slot.
>> Will keep you updated.
>
> I don't thin
On 20-05-13 11:55, Luca Falavigna wrote:
> I just checked, openmotif has only two rdeps, all of them in non-free,
> and just for i386 and amd64 architectures. I don't think removing
> openmotif from non-free and immediately accepting motif in main would
> cause a lot of trouble for those two packag
Hi Luca,
[What would be the appropriate mail-list or bug-tracker for this
discussion to happen in the open? Should I add it to the transition bug?]
On 20-05-13 09:03, Luca Falavigna wrote:
> 2013/5/18 Paul Gevers :
>> While we are waiting for the release team to respond to my questions
Hi Luca
On 06-05-13 00:22, Luca Falavigna wrote:
> 2013/5/5 Paul Gevers :
>> As the release of wheezy has happened this weekend. Is it now a good
>> time to follow up on the actions above?
>
> It should, yes.
> Feel free to upload motif to unstable, then I'll take
https://lists.debian.org/debian-release/2013/05/msg00161.html
or 51881a33.6030...@debian.org
I like to request a transition slot for lesstif2 to (open)motif.
To keep current unstable build-able and installable, I propose the
follow transition path:
On 07-05-13 21:32, Paul Gevers wrote:
>
Source: xtel
User: openmo...@packages.debian.org
Usertags: lesstif2motif
Version: 3.3.0-14
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-CC: openmo...@packages.debian.org
Hi Maintainer,
Your package build depends on libxp-dev but does not declare this
relation in the debian/control file. This is currently not a pro
Source: hotswap
User: openmo...@packages.debian.org
Usertags: lesstif2motif
Version: 0.4.0-12
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-CC: openmo...@packages.debian.org
Hi Maintainer,
Your package build depends on libxt-dev, libxext-dev and libxp-dev but
does not declare this relation in the debian/control fil
Seems like the bug was not forwarded, oh well
The first example:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=707211
I go now.
Paul
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
1 - 100 of 156 matches
Mail list logo
