Package: local-apt-repository
Version: 0.9
Followup-For: Bug #1085265
X-Debbugs-Cc: okgomdjgbm...@gmail.com
Dear Maintainer,
in the previous one, the loop doesn't do its job. fix
#!/bin/bash
set -e
DEBS=/srv/local-apt-repository
REPO=/var/lib/local-apt-repository
if ! test -d $DEBS
then
# W
Package: local-apt-repository
Version: 0.9
Followup-For: Bug #1085265
X-Debbugs-Cc: okgomdjgbm...@gmail.com
Dear Maintainer,
i encoutered more issues. Because i'm using mv, the files are relativelly old,
so the if statement with the stamp isn't triggered. But with caching this can
be removed. T
Package: local-apt-repository
Version: 0.9
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-Cc: okgomdjgbm...@gmail.com
Dear Maintainer,
If you have a bunch of packages, regeneration takes very long because it
rebuilds everything from scratch. It should be using caching. Something like
this:
apt-ftparchive p
Package: local-apt-repository
Version: 0.9
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-Cc: okgomdjgbm...@gmail.com
Dear Maintainer,
i symlinked /srv/local-apt-repository, and that made the test fail, because it
tests the file of the symlink.
I'm proposing this change in the test:
find $DEBS/* -newer $REPO/sta
v meeting and see what we
can do about this.
Personally, I think the dependency on libnih-dbus-dev looks so minimal
in lomiri-download-manager, it should be replacable.
Mike
--
mike gabriel aka sunweaver (Debian Developer)
mobile: +49 (1520) 1976 148
landline: +49 (4351) 486 14 27
GnuPG Fi
Hi Paul,
On Fr 11 Dez 2020 20:43:00 CET, Paul Gevers wrote:
Hi Mike,
All bugs have caused the packages to be on the list for autoremoval. It
seems there is one bug to be filed still, can you please do that?
Paul
screenkey: screenkey<- unfiled yet (added this year)
I h
Hi Simon,
On Do 10 Dez 2020 16:08:00 CET, Simon McVittie wrote:
Control: severity -1 serious
On Thu, 10 Dec 2020 at 14:37:21 +, Mike Gabriel wrote:
On Do 10 Dez 2020 15:35:19 CET, Paul Gevers wrote:
> We're running into the freeze of bullseye soon. The first bug I checked
&g
Hi Paul,
On Do 10 Dez 2020 15:35:19 CET, Paul Gevers wrote:
Hi Mike,
On Wed, 15 Apr 2020 19:06:59 + Mike Gabriel
wrote:
>> If you want to get this done for bullseye, please upgrade these bugs to
>> serious. Autoremovals will take care of some of the packages.
The rest w
ous. Autoremovals will take care of some of the packages. The rest will
need manual fixes.
I haven't done that. I think the severity of these bugs is a decision
for the maintainer of the replacement to make.
I think we should start with important and raise to serious after 8
weeks or so
make files that are not readable by id3v2. :(
Perhaps it's time to pension off id3v2?
Mike.
. If that is
> > granted, all else follows.
> > -- George Orwell
> Sent from Mail for Windows 10
>
I have just become the new maintainer of the autofs package.
Thus, closing this bug.
Mike
;
> Regards,
> Salvatore
>
>
I just uploaded autofs 5.1.5-1 to Debian experimental.
Thus, closing this bug.
Mike
enables libtirpc support in autofs which helps
with IPv6 DNS hostname resolution. Please check, if IPv6 IP number
support is working with the upcoming version (5.1.5-1).
If not, please reopen.
Thanks,
Mike
fixable with mixed architectures of autofs kernel module and userland
daemon.
Mike
returned an error code (1)
>
> After all autofs has been installed, but systemd fails to start it's
unit.
Please switch autofs to debug mode (/etc/autofs.conf) and provide the logs.
Thanks,
Mike
oblem by renaming /sbin/mount.cifs into
mount.cifs.real
> and writing the following script in /sbin/mount.cifs:
> #!/bin/bash
> SHARE="${1/\\\$/\$}"
> shift
> exec "$0".real "$SHARE" "$@"
>
>
> Please, propose a way (whatever it is) to quote the share name.
This is interesting. The double quote feature for the "$" sign in
locations got added in 2007 [1].
Maybe a regression?
Mike
[1]
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/storage/autofs/autofs.git/commit/?id=3243d2ffbe53eb3fe24e03b239ffcc5cb21e75e4
t autofs should receive some
restart-if-no-working-correctly-logic.
However, this specific bug, I will close now. Feel free to reopen and
retitle if you think it is needed.
Thanks,
Mike
.
Thus adding the necessary meta data to this bug and marking the bug as a
jessie-only issue.
Mike
unt nfs4 mounts it works
However, I suspect that we cannot entangle autofs and NFS as much as you
propose here. Note that people also may use autofs for local device
mounting and don't run NFS with it at all.
So, for the autofs side of things, I propose this (a Wants= solution
rather than a R
Hi Ivo,
On Mi 17 Okt 2018 15:46:11 CEST, Ivo De Decker wrote:
Control: block 895038 by 895037
Hi,
On Fri, Apr 06, 2018 at 01:07:39PM +, Mike Gabriel wrote:
Package: src:libappindicator
Severity: serious
The libappindicator package is currently QA team maintained in Debian and
shall be
ator to be removed from Debian, the
src:libappindicator must become to a removable state, see [1].
Thanks,
Mike
[1] https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=895037
--
mike gabriel aka sunweaver (Debian Developer)
mobile: +49 (1520) 1976 148
landline: +49 (4354) 8390 139
GnuPG Fingerprint:
ng and the porting
status, see [2]
Greets,
Mike
[1] https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2018/03/msg00506.html
[2] https://wiki.debian.org/Ayatana/IndicatorsTransition
--
mike gabriel aka sunweaver (Debian Developer)
mobile: +49 (1520) 1976 148
landline: +49 (4354) 8390 139
GnuPG Fingerprint:
muxi (= 1.0.7-2)
smuxi
So, in a nutshell, these packages need to be addressed: smuxi,
pidgin-libnotify and mopidy-mpris require changes to have libindicate
removed from Debian.
Greets,
Mike
--
DAS-NETZWERKTEAM
mike gabriel, herweg 7, 24357 fleckeby
mobile: +49 (1520) 1976 148
landline: +49 (4
ollowing output:
+ [ -f /sys/bus/pci/drivers/radeon/:02:00.0/power_method ]
+ echo -n profile
+ echo profile
sh: echo: I/O error
I'm not saying the script should come with set -x set, but at the very
least, it should print out something useful when something fails to be
set for some reason.
Mike
ch to bail out if file cannot be opened. Closes: #715777
+ [ Mike Gerow ]
+ * Remove libjasper-dev dependency. Closes: #818195
+
-- Tobias Frost Sat, 30 Apr 2016 23:46:28 +0200
dcraw (9.26-1) unstable; urgency=medium
diff --git a/debian/control b/debian/control
index c27a7b0..87c7f00 10
Package: mozplugger
Version: 1.14.5-2
Severity: wishlist
Dear Maintainer,
AFAIK, mozplugger is a NPAPI plugin and chromium has dropped support for
NPAPI plugins some time ago. I don't expect mozplugger to be loaded by
chromium anymore.
Mike
l see
multiple instances of at least purgatory/arch/i386/entry32-16-debug.S
(along with other cases).
Perhaps pristine-tar could use an enhancement to screen out duplicates
from the upstream manifest, if only to prevent breakage - or perhaps to
warn the user.
-Mike
is...@pobox.com
is...@isely
Package: cvsps
Version: 2.1-6
Severity: important
cvsps has new management under Eric S. Raymond, with a new focus on
purely being a tool to salvage CVS repositories into DVCSes. It also
no longer depends on any other CVS implementation, instead
implementing the network protocol itself as well as
g API differences) and it was never stable.
I don't have the cycles to port it; in addition, spf-milter-python appears
to be a suitably functional replacement. Given those facts, I suppose
dropping it is for the best.
--
Mike Markley
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-packages-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/2013013735.gj28...@madhack.com
ot; rating with the BBB!
Don’t wait call now!
Mr. Mike L. Bernhard
Email Broadcast Specialist
U.S. Deployment Division
1 (800) 598-3550 Ext 230
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-packages-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@list
; conflicting with the gecko-mediaplayer package, unless this can be
> resolved some other way.
Surely, the gecko-mediaplayer issue is transient, so there's no point
for iceweasel to conflict with it, but the gecko-mediaplayer issue does
need to be fixed.
Mike
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, emai
ember
> > reading
> > any report of the gov already revoking it.
>
> There was a new update of firefox today that removed an other
> certificate.
It corresponds to the second nss upload in Debian. (DSA-2300-2)
Mike
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-packages-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110907162657.ga16...@glandium.org
hromium uses libnss, please explain, what kind of update chromium
> needs? did I miss something?
You missed the part where chromium uses libpkix (despite mozilla
saying it's not ready), and the libpkix path doesn't reject the certs
chaining to the Explicitly Disabled CAs.
Mike
--
T
t; > useless for this case.
>
> It could theoreticly also be used to block any certificate if
> we'd know the public key. But I agree it's useless for this case.
Actually, if it was used at all levels of the cert chain, we could block
the CA certificates we want. And we d
On Sun, Sep 04, 2011 at 01:37:19AM -0500, Raphael Geissert wrote:
> On Saturday 03 September 2011 01:45:22 Mike Hommey wrote:
> > Looking at the patches, this really is:
> [...]
>
> Ok, with the patches we got NSS covered, but we still need to do something
> for
> other
On Sun, Sep 04, 2011 at 01:37:19AM -0500, Raphael Geissert wrote:
> On Saturday 03 September 2011 01:45:22 Mike Hommey wrote:
> > Looking at the patches, this really is:
> [...]
>
> Ok, with the patches we got NSS covered, but we still need to do something
> for
> other
On Sat, Sep 03, 2011 at 08:45:22AM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 03, 2011 at 07:40:23AM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote:
> > On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 11:02:53PM -0500, Raphael Geissert wrote:
> > > On Tuesday 30 August 2011 23:30:19 Mike Hommey wrote:
> > > > On W
On Sat, Sep 03, 2011 at 07:40:23AM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 11:02:53PM -0500, Raphael Geissert wrote:
> > On Tuesday 30 August 2011 23:30:19 Mike Hommey wrote:
> > > On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 06:26:26AM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote:
> > > >
On Sat, Sep 03, 2011 at 07:40:23AM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 11:02:53PM -0500, Raphael Geissert wrote:
> > On Tuesday 30 August 2011 23:30:19 Mike Hommey wrote:
> > > On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 06:26:26AM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote:
> > > >
On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 11:02:53PM -0500, Raphael Geissert wrote:
> On Tuesday 30 August 2011 23:30:19 Mike Hommey wrote:
> > On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 06:26:26AM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote:
> > > So, I'll put that on tiredness. That'd be several fraudulent
> > &
On Thu, Sep 01, 2011 at 11:37:41PM -0500, Raphael Geissert wrote:
> On Thursday 01 September 2011 17:47:57 Mike Hommey wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 01, 2011 at 02:06:39PM -0500, Raphael Geissert wrote:
> > > Unless other certificates were signed with another CA, at least the
>
On Thu, Sep 01, 2011 at 02:06:39PM -0500, Raphael Geissert wrote:
> On Thursday 01 September 2011 01:37:01 Mike Hommey wrote:
> > On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 11:02:53PM -0500, Raphael Geissert wrote:
> > Well, reality is that the Firefox 6.0.1 release, which has a white least
&g
On Thu, Sep 01, 2011 at 08:37:01AM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 11:02:53PM -0500, Raphael Geissert wrote:
> > On Tuesday 30 August 2011 23:30:19 Mike Hommey wrote:
> > > On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 06:26:26AM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote:
> > > >
On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 11:02:53PM -0500, Raphael Geissert wrote:
> On Tuesday 30 August 2011 23:30:19 Mike Hommey wrote:
> > On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 06:26:26AM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote:
> > > So, I'll put that on tiredness. That'd be several fraudulent
> > &
On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 10:49:04PM -0500, Raphael Geissert wrote:
> On Tuesday 30 August 2011 15:48:11 Mike Hommey wrote:
> > On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 09:58:18PM +0200, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
> > > On mar., 2011-08-30 at 12:29 -0500, Raphael Geissert wrote:
> > > > W
On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 06:26:26AM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 10:48:11PM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote:
> > On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 09:58:18PM +0200, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
> > > On mar., 2011-08-30 at 12:29 -0500, Raphael Geissert wrote:
> > > >
On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 10:48:11PM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 09:58:18PM +0200, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
> > On mar., 2011-08-30 at 12:29 -0500, Raphael Geissert wrote:
> > > On Tuesday 30 August 2011 01:08:29 Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
> > > >
least evolution now uses the shared sqlite db (cert9.db and
> key4.db, see https://wiki.mozilla.org/NSS_Shared_DB).
The NSS tools are supposed to work with whatever database version you
use, since they use NSS ;)
That being said, there is a huge problem with mitigation in basically
al
Source: b43-fwcutter
Version: 1:013-3
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy 12.5
debian/copyright states that this package is GPL, however, it appears to have a
2 clause BSD license, and some code in the public domain. The BSD license
requires that copyright holders be listed, and they are not
Hi,
Last chance! Just a reminder, Mike would like to
share approved contacts with you on Boxbe.
Use this link:
https://www.boxbe.com/register?tc=3618601470_1438997542
This message was sent at the request of genkstar...@yahoo.com.
If you want to opt-out of invitations from Boxbe members
I'd like to share approved contacts with you on Boxbe
Here's the link: https://www.boxbe.com/register?tc=3568740172_564479745
-Mike
This message was sent at the request of genkstar...@yahoo.com.
If you want to opt-out of invitations from Boxbe members, use this link:
https://www
Package: sopwith
Version: 1.7.1-4
Severity: wishlist
Upstream has Sopwith 1.7.2 available. Please package :-)
-- System Information:
Debian Release: squeeze/sid
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (500, 'testing')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.32-5-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Lo
I set up a Facebook profile where I can post my pictures, videos and events and
I want to add you as a friend so you can see it. First, you need to join
Facebook! Once you join, you can also create your own profile.
--
Mafia Wars Daily Player
--
Thanks,
Mike
To sign up for
On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 06:45:11PM +0100, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 09:56:00AM +0100, Mike Hommey wrote:
> > # For the last 4 packages, please check bug #557604.
> > # For the other packages, only a "binNMU" is necessary.
> > # (except that re
at iceape will be fixed, as will icedove 3.
>
> Shouldn't you have filed the bug *after* you fixed them in
> any case so that those dicts won't stop working? (And eventually
> we should add a Breaks:?)
As said on IRC, they won't break, they will possibly shown as xx_XX
ins
# For the last 4 packages, please check bug #557604.
# For the other packages, only a "binNMU" is necessary.
# (except that real binNMUs are not supported on arch:all packages)
clone 560106 -1
reassign -1 igerman98
retitle -1 Please rebuild igerman98 against latest dictionaries-common-dev
clone 560
severity 491101 grave
thanks
The command is completely non-functional.
--
Mike Stroyan, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Upon closer inspection, it looks like the problem is bigger than just an
incomplete copyright file. Several of the files, for example,
happydoclib/formatter/xmlformatterbase.py contain the statments:
# This is free software, and you are welcome to redistribute it
# under certain conditions. For d
Package: python-happydoc
Version: 2.1-6
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy 12.5
many of the files distributed in the python-happydoc package have
Copyright statements in them which aren't reflected in
/usr/share/doc/python-happydoc/copyright. For example:
/usr/share/pyshared/happydoclib/doc
Grüße
Mike
Diese ePost wurde versendet von: Mike ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
(Geac) , Vista (Epicor)
For more information about these lists as well as our other software lists you
can visit our corporate web site by clicking the link below..
http://www.repharm.com
If you'd like more information, please contact Mike Gordon at our
Repharm office at (905) 728
retitle 444718 RM: sope -- RoQA; NPOASR; RC-Buggy
reassign 444718 ftp.debian.org
severity 444718 normal
thanks
sope was never released upstream. It is currently buggy, unmaintained,
and has never been part of a stable release.
I think it therefore makes a good candidate for removal.
thanks,
ste
Package: fpm
Version: 0.60-2
Severity: wishlist
I like to copy/paste, how about you?
cat > usr/share/menu/fpm << EOF
?package(fpm):\
needs="X11"\
section="Apps/Text"\
title="fpm"\
longtitle="Figaro's Password Manager"\
ico
Package: libdvilib2-16
Version: 1.3.2-1
Severity: serious
libdvilib2-16 needs to conflict with libdvilib2-13 to ensure a smooth
transition. Otherwise, the following error occrus:
Unpacking libdvilib2-16 (from .../libdvilib2-16_1.3.2-1_i386.deb) ...
dpkg: error processing
/var/cache/apt/archives/
http://world-of-soccer.biz
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: ogle-gui
Version: 0.9.2-3
Severity: wishlist
It'd be nice to see ogle-gui built with gtk2 by default (--enable-gtk2). There
doesn't appear to be any ifdef's or special code, just include path and linking
library adjustments. Seems to behave the same (no major problems) and looks
alot
o see what options to
pass to make), it fails because ieee80211-source 1.1.6-3 doesn't define
WLAN_AUTH_LEAP.
[1] http://mail.gnome.org/archives/networkmanager-list/2006-March/msg00120.html
--
Mike Paul <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Package: ilisp
Version: 5.12.0+cvs.2004.12.26
Severity: minor
I have only guile 1.6 and not guile 1.4 installed and whenever I start
a guile process in emacs using ilisp I get the error that
/usr/bin/guile1.4 does not exist. It seems to be because the
following line (line 80) in /etc/ilisp/ilisp.
Package: perl4caml
Severity: grave
This package is built from the wrong OCaml version(it slipped in with a
bad dependency) and thus is completely useless in Debian. I'm uploading
a new version now, but since Sarge is frozen, if it doesn't get built in
time or some such, this package shouldn't be
Package: webmin-snort
Version: 1.1-2
Severity: normal
This is the default Debian config file, to set $RULE_PATH to
"/etc/snort/rules". If you don't want to read this from the cfg file then
you should hardcode "/etc/snort/rules" in.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
Architecture: sparc (
tags 213303 + wontfix
close 213303
thanks
This is the intended behaviour of xdkcal, perhaps the submitter is after
something else?
Mike.
--
Mike Beattie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ZL4TXK, IRLP Node 6184
CPU's dont tend to work very well after their "magic smoke" has escaped.
Package: capplets
Version: 1:2.6.1-1
Severity: wishlist
File: /usr/bin/gnome-font-viewer
Tags: experimental
The string shown by the gnome font viewer should be changeable by user
request, for that one may want to look at a japanese, korean, whatever font,
and with the standard english sentence, yo
Package: multi-gnome-terminal
Version: 1.6.2-3
Severity: wishlist
I saw today the screen did not use it's parent terminal's scrollback
features. Screen for other reasons needs a copy of the scroll back buffer
so it has it's own buffer and control mechinisem. It would be nice if
screen could open
bility to modify the code for your platform, I would
go ahead and do so.
Regards,
Mike McCaughey
At 3:43 PM +0200 6/12/02, Helge Kreutzmann wrote:
Hello !
On Wed, Jun 12, 2002 at 02:07:40PM +0200, Tille, Andreas wrote:
On Wed, 12 Jun 2002, Helge Kreutzmann wrote:
> This is the same impre
Package: cooledit
Version: 3.17.1-3.1
On an alpha box, the splash screen and edit window come up, but as
soon as I hit the first key (e.g., 'a'), it cores.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
nstable (sid)
is very recent and may be more solid than Redhat
(except for the broken packages sometimes).
Currently I wouldn't use woody on a production
server.
Okay, these where my concerns, I'd like to
hear some suggestions and answers.
I don't know if this message is stored
76 matches
Mail list logo
