gkrelluim is marked for autoremoval from testing

2025-01-16 Thread Debian testing autoremoval watch
gkrelluim 0.3.2-2 is marked for autoremoval from testing on 2025-02-19 It (build-)depends on packages with these RC bugs: 1092240: uim: FTBFS with gettext 0.23.x https://bugs.debian.org/1092240 For more information on the autoremoval process, including hints to prevent autoremoval can be found

metatheme-gilouche is marked for autoremoval from testing

2025-01-16 Thread Debian testing autoremoval watch
metatheme-gilouche 11.1.2-4 is marked for autoremoval from testing on 2025-02-19 It (build-)depends on packages with these RC bugs: 1092238: tango-icon-theme: FTBFS with gettext 0.23.x https://bugs.debian.org/1092238 For more information on the autoremoval process, including hints to prevent a

Processed: Correctly reassign bugs

2025-01-16 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > # I have no idea why they are reassigned > # from src:id3lib3.8.3 to src:taglib in > # https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=449186;msg=11 > # but anyway I am assigning them back. > # > reassign 317478 src:id3lib3.8.3 3.8.3-16.2 Bug #3

Bug#1044355: marked as done (gitbrute: Fails to build source after successful build)

2025-01-16 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 16 Jan 2025 21:16:28 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1044355: fixed in gitbrute 0~15-3 has caused the Debian Bug report #1044355, regarding gitbrute: Fails to build source after successful build to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem ha

gitbrute_0~15-3_source.changes ACCEPTED into unstable

2025-01-16 Thread Debian FTP Masters
Thank you for your contribution to Debian. Accepted: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Format: 1.8 Date: Thu, 16 Jan 2025 14:51:16 -0500 Source: gitbrute Architecture: source Version: 0~15-3 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Debian QA Group Changed-By: Boyuan Ya

Bug#1093237: smuxi: Please consider changing the mono-runtime build-dependency

2025-01-16 Thread Antoine Le Gonidec
Source: smuxi Severity: wishlist As of Trixie/Sid, smuxi build-depends explicitly on mono-runtime-boehm. This is a package built from mono:src, not available on all architectures, and that I plan to drop in favour of mono-runtime-sgen (that is already available, and the default garbage collector f

Processing of gitbrute_0~15-3_source.changes

2025-01-16 Thread Debian FTP Masters
gitbrute_0~15-3_source.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: gitbrute_0~15-3.dsc gitbrute_0~15.orig.tar.xz gitbrute_0~15-3.debian.tar.xz gitbrute_0~15-3_amd64.buildinfo Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon (running on host usper.debian.org)

[bts-link] source package raptor2

2025-01-16 Thread debian-bts-link
# # bts-link upstream status pull for source package raptor2 # see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html # https://bts-link-team.pages.debian.net/bts-link/ # user debian-bts-l...@lists.debian.org # remote status report for #1067896 (http://bugs.debian.org/1067896

Bug#1078121: marked as done (colorhug-client: Problems reported by "appstreamcli validate-tree")

2025-01-16 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 16 Jan 2025 15:26:27 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1078121: fixed in colorhug-client 0.2.8-6 has caused the Debian Bug report #1078121, regarding colorhug-client: Problems reported by "appstreamcli validate-tree" to be marked as done. This means that you claim

colorhug-client_0.2.8-6_source.changes ACCEPTED into unstable

2025-01-16 Thread Debian FTP Masters
Thank you for your contribution to Debian. Accepted: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Format: 1.8 Date: Thu, 16 Jan 2025 15:51:43 +0100 Source: colorhug-client Architecture: source Version: 0.2.8-6 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Debian QA Group Changed-By: P

Processing of colorhug-client_0.2.8-6_source.changes

2025-01-16 Thread Debian FTP Masters
colorhug-client_0.2.8-6_source.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: colorhug-client_0.2.8-6.dsc colorhug-client_0.2.8-6.debian.tar.xz colorhug-client_0.2.8-6_source.buildinfo Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon (running on host usper.debian.org)

Processed: Re: colorhug-client: Obsolete appdata should be renamed to metainfo

2025-01-16 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tags -1 + patch Bug #1078121 [colorhug-client] colorhug-client: Problems reported by "appstreamcli validate-tree" Added tag(s) patch. -- 1078121: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1078121 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org wit

Bug#1078121: colorhug-client: Obsolete appdata should be renamed to metainfo

2025-01-16 Thread Petter Reinholdtsen
Control: tags -1 + patch [Andreas Tille 2024-11-11] > remains and I need to admit I have no idea how to fix it. Thus I > retitle the bug to the remaining problem. Very good. Here is a patch solving all parsing errors. diff --git a/debian/patches/1010-appstream-typos.patch b/debian/patches/101

Processed: Re: parser: please make the build reproducible

2025-01-16 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > forcemerge 1093198 1093199 Bug #1093198 [src:parser] parser: please make the build reproducible Bug #1093199 [src:parser] parser: please make the build reproducible Merged 1093198 1093199 > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if yo

Bug#1093199: parser: please make the build reproducible

2025-01-16 Thread Chris Lamb
Source: parser Version: 3.5.1-1 Severity: wishlist Tags: patch User: reproducible-bui...@lists.alioth.debian.org Usertags: randomness X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-b...@lists.alioth.debian.org Hi, Whilst working on the Reproducible Builds effort [0], we noticed that parser could not be built reprodu