Bug#161638: marked as done (Cronjob creates hundreds of processes and box runs out of memory)

2002-09-30 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 30 Sep 2002 13:02:53 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#161638: fixed in fwanalog 0.6.1-3 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now y

Bug#162002: marked as done (fwanalog: Purging did not remove /etc/cron.daily/fwanalog)

2002-09-30 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 30 Sep 2002 13:02:53 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#162002: fixed in fwanalog 0.6.1-3 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now y

O: setserial -- serial configuration at bootup

2002-09-30 Thread Russell, Gordon
Package: wnpp Severity: normal I am now retiring from Debian. Please give setserial to a good home. Thanks. G.

Bug#122274: marked as done (elm-me+: newmail can't parse mailbox)

2002-09-30 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 30 Sep 2002 07:17:35 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#122274: fixed in elm-me+ 2.4pl25ME+99c-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it i

elm-me+_2.4pl25ME+99c-2_i386.changes ACCEPTED

2002-09-30 Thread Debian Installer
Accepted: elm-me+_2.4pl25ME+99c-2.diff.gz to pool/main/e/elm-me+/elm-me+_2.4pl25ME+99c-2.diff.gz elm-me+_2.4pl25ME+99c-2.dsc to pool/main/e/elm-me+/elm-me+_2.4pl25ME+99c-2.dsc elm-me+_2.4pl25ME+99c-2_i386.deb to pool/main/e/elm-me+/elm-me+_2.4pl25ME+99c-2_i386.deb Announcing to debian-devel-

Processed: Re: elm-me+: newmail can't parse mailbox

2002-09-30 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 122274 - unreproducible Bug#122274: elm-me+: newmail can't parse mailbox Tags removed: unreproducible > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bu

Bug#82908: http://people.debian.org/~vela/elm-me+/00-debian.diff

2002-09-30 Thread Matej Vela
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > > You mean #82908? IMHO, and the author obviously agrees, mail.services is > > a simple and elegant solution -- it is your mail server that is broken. > > AFAICT, the only relevant part of the bug is editing headers with arrows. > > I guess I will try this new versio

Bug#122274: elm-me+: newmail can't parse mailbox

2002-09-30 Thread Matej Vela
tags 122274 - unreproducible thanks "Nathan A. Ferch" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Here's my procmailrc. I've also included the mailboxes that my MTA created > 'nf' > and procmail 'elmtest'. > > Let me know if there's any other way I can help. A fix is in Incoming. Thanks for being so respo

Bug#82906: Typos in elm -vv.

2002-09-30 Thread Matej Vela
Petr Hudec <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Package: elm-me+ > Version: 2.4pl25ME+87-1 > Severity: wishlist > > (maybe minor?) > > Some of these would, probably, require changes in Makefile (or configure?), > hopefully all of them are "doable", though: > > "Elm will add the From: header: not DONT_

Bug#126154: marked as done (elm-me+: elm does not handle 8859-1 characters)

2002-09-30 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated 30 Sep 2002 08:09:23 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line #126154 needs =?iso-8859-1?q?locale=E4?= has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now you