Petr Hudec <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Package: elm-me+ > Version: 2.4pl25ME+87-1 > Severity: wishlist > > (maybe minor?) > > Some of these would, probably, require changes in Makefile (or configure?), > hopefully all of them are "doable", though: > > "Elm will add the From: header: not DONT_ADD_FROM" could be > "Elm will add the From: header: yes" or > "Elm will not add the From: header: no" or > "Elm will add the From: header: ADD_FROM" > > "Folder locking in not possible: not SYSCALL_LOCKING" probably should be > Folder locking if not possible: not SYSCALL_LOCKING" > > "No debug options are available: not DEBUG" could be > "Available debug options: no DEBUG" or maybe > "No debug options: yes" or > "Debug options: no DEBUG" > ...or it means something else but then I didn't get it
These three have been fixed. > Well, there are few more that I don't list. I would suggest not to use > negative options like "Don't use 8BIT content_transfer_encoding with > -B8BITMIME -option". It may make sense if the used option was positive (just > "USE_8BITMIME"). But even then, why couldn't it be: "Use 8BIT > content_transfer_encoding with -B8BITMIME -option: no USE_8BITMIME" or "8BIT > content_transfer_encoding with -B8BITMIME -option: do not USE_8BITMIME". > Something like that. Using many negatives makes it hard to read and > understand what actually is it saying. > > Hm... maybe it was meant as "Don't use 8BIT content_transfer_encoding with > -B8BITMIME -option (not USE_8BITMIME)" ? Without colon? Just explaining the > first part. In either case, I would like it more clear. Is 2.4pl25ME+99c-1 okay? Thanks, Matej
