Bug#890944: new packages should not receive emails before email alias is created

2018-03-04 Thread Raphael Hertzog
Hi, On Sun, 04 Mar 2018, Luca Falavigna wrote: > Well, recent changes just changed email to > @packages.debian.org, so I'm not convinced this is a bug in > dak itself. > > Could it be the small delay while processing mails to > @packages.qa.debian.org (which are then forwarded to > @packages.debi

Bug#890944: new packages should not receive emails before email alias is created

2018-03-05 Thread Raphael Hertzog
Hi, On Mon, 05 Mar 2018, Luca Falavigna wrote: > > It works for whatever you want. Ansgar asked me a few questions on > > this topic recently and he said that DAK was already mailing the > > maintainer directly so he would certainly just mail the maintainer + > > dispatch@tracker.d.o in all cases

Bug#890944: new packages should not receive emails before email alias is created

2018-03-07 Thread Raphael Hertzog
Hi, On Tue, 06 Mar 2018, Thorsten Alteholz wrote: > On Mon, 5 Mar 2018, Luca Falavigna wrote: > > OK. Can you please indicate which header is used to reference the > > source package when sending mails to dispatch@tracker.d.o? > > does [1] make sense for this? > [1] https://salsa.debian.org/ftp-t

Re: Feedback on Package overview page - Distro tracker

2018-03-27 Thread Raphael Hertzog
Hi, On Tue, 27 Mar 2018, Chirath R wrote: > I have made mockup designs for package overview page as part of GSoC > project. It would be nice to get feedback on the design and if you could > mention which fields are most important. I find the table layout more useful. Concerning the fields, you ne

Re: Feedback on Package overview page - Distro tracker

2018-03-29 Thread Raphael Hertzog
On Wed, 28 Mar 2018, Chirath R wrote: > > - the action items should be easily accessible at least in the expanded > > view, the number of action items by severity would thus be interesting > > Can I know what an action item here represents. Is it something like a > `Newer upstream version`? Eve

Bug#895393: tracker.debian.org thinks 3.9.8 is the latest standards version

2018-04-16 Thread Raphael Hertzog
Control: tag -1 + newcomer Hello, On Wed, 11 Apr 2018, dequis wrote: > The old package tracker complains that my package is "severely out of > date", while the new one thinks it is up to date and doesn't complain > about anything. [...] > < pabs> IIRC the tracker code looks at the version of the

Bug#755043: Initial import needs more than 14GB of RAM

2018-04-24 Thread Raphael Hertzog
Hello, On Thu, 17 Jul 2014 14:49:42 +0200 Vincent Bernat wrote: > With just unstable, I was able to do the import process with about 3.8 > GB in a little less than 3 hours. FWIW, we are now using GitLab CI on salsa.debian.org to generate once a week a sample database that can be download to avoi

Bug#897225: tracker.debian.org: allow adding custom modifications

2018-05-02 Thread Raphael Hertzog
Hi, On Mon, 30 Apr 2018, Markus Koschany wrote: > tracker's package overview is very helpful in gathering a lot of > information about certain packages. It would be even more useful if > maintainers or teams were able to add custom information to it. I > currently count nine "tables" (lists), gene

Bug#897227: tracker.debian.org: allow overriding values

2018-05-02 Thread Raphael Hertzog
Control: retitle -1 tracker.debian.org: manage metadata like Vcs/Homepage/Maintainer/Uploaders Hi Markus, On Mon, 30 Apr 2018, Markus Koschany wrote: > some information in packages can get quickly outdated like VCS links, > homepage addresses or the information about the actual uploaders of > te

Re: GSOC: Distro Tracker

2018-05-04 Thread Raphael Hertzog
Hi Arthur, On Fri, 27 Apr 2018, Arthur Del Esposte wrote: > We will probably start by importing the data from SALSA to the Distro > Tracker. Tying anything to salsa looks wrong. We want VCS data even if the repository is not hosted on salsa.debian.org. You probably want to have a good abstraction

Bug#898564: please bump the Ubuntu links from bionic to cosmic

2018-05-13 Thread Raphael Hertzog
Hi Matthias, On Sun, 13 May 2018, Matthias Klose wrote: > please bump the Ubuntu links from bionic to cosmic, showing the package > versions > for the most recent Ubuntu development version. The tracker relies on data exported by UDD: https://udd.debian.org/cgi-bin/ubuntupackages.cgi Lucas, can

Bug#899244: tracker.debian.org: emails sent to non-existing/misspelled team names (team+NAME@..) are silently discarded

2018-05-22 Thread Raphael Hertzog
Hi, On Mon, 21 May 2018, Lars Kruse wrote: > recently I sent a mail to , as this is Do you really mean "team-munin@t.d.o" and not "team+munin@t.d.o" ? > (this issue of the missing team "munin") is about to be fixed now) This leads me to believe that you meant the latter. > My mail was silently

Bug#899405: tracker: Default documentation is not user-oriented

2018-05-24 Thread Raphael Hertzog
Control: tag -1 + newcomer Control: severity -1 + important Hello, On Wed, 23 May 2018, Guillem Jover wrote: > The tracker provides links to its documentation (at [T]), but that > looks rather developer oriented. If you want to get some user > documentation it seems that currently the main source

Bug#850409: tracker.debian.org: .dsc link to packages in update is broken

2018-06-22 Thread Raphael Hertzog
Hi, On Thu, 21 Jun 2018, Lev Lazinskiy wrote: > > This is a problem with the data model used by the tracker. The "directory" > > field should never have been associated to a SourcePackage but to > > its associated SourcePackageRepositoryEntry. After all the package can > > reside on two mirrors in

Bug#902262: tracker.debian.org: incorrect data for owncloud removal

2018-06-26 Thread Raphael Hertzog
Hi, On Sun, 24 Jun 2018, Paul Wise wrote: > The removals news items for owncloud differ from the PTS: > > https://packages.qa.debian.org/o/owncloud.html > > [2017-05-06] Removed 7.0.4+dfsg-4~deb8u4 from stable (None) > [2016-04-26] Removed 7.0.13~dfsg-1 from unstable (None) > [2016-04-15] ownclo

Bug#902438: tracker.debian.org: broken links in VCS field

2018-06-28 Thread Raphael Hertzog
Hi, On Tue, 26 Jun 2018, Sven Joachim wrote: > In the VCS field on https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/$package there are > three new links labeled changelog_distribution, changelog_version and > package_version. Unfortunately they are all 404 compliant. Yeah, a mistake that I already reported here:

Bug#903155: tracker.debian.org: cripples Firefox 61.0

2018-07-07 Thread Raphael Hertzog
Hello Dmitry, On Sat, 07 Jul 2018, Dmitry Smirnov wrote: > For a while I thought that "tracker.debian.org" is just immature > but some time ago I've noticed that from some other networks > Firefox load pages from tracker.debian.org just fine. > Now I'm suspecting that somewhere we may have somethi

Re: Bug#903155: tracker.debian.org: cripples Firefox 61.0

2018-07-07 Thread Raphael Hertzog
Hi, On Sat, 07 Jul 2018, Dmitry Smirnov wrote: > > Do the following commands work faster ? > > > > curl https://tracker.debian.org/static/css/dense.css > > or > > wget https://tracker.debian.org/static/css/dense.css > > Yes they do work faster however it is not the same as browser requests. > B

Re: debci configuration is inconsistent, disrupts package migration

2018-07-17 Thread Raphael Hertzog
Hi, moving this to debian...@lists.debian.org. debian-qa is of no help here. Thanks. On Tue, 17 Jul 2018, Drew Parsons wrote: > The configuration of ci.debian.org is not consistent. A failing test > of deal.ii is marked on > https://ci.debian.net/packages/d/deal.ii/testing/amd64/ > as trigge

Bug#904634: tracker.debian.org: no href target in link for "NN bugs tagged patch in the BTS" action

2018-07-26 Thread Raphael Hertzog
Hi, On Thu, 26 Jul 2018, Paul Wise wrote: > The href target for the link in the "NN bugs tagged patch in the BTS" > action is empty. Here is an example from glibc: > > 45 bugs tagged patch in the BTS > > https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/glibc > > Since the link is present in another part of t

Bug#904694: tracker.debian.org: don't complain about outdated S-V for packages only in <= stable

2018-07-27 Thread Raphael Hertzog
Control: tag -1 + newcomer Hi Adam, thanks for the report. On Thu, 26 Jul 2018, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/postgresql-9.6 reports both that the > package is "not in any development repository", and that "[t]he package > is severely out of date with respect to the Deb

Bug#899405: tracker: Default documentation is not user-oriented

2018-08-20 Thread Raphael Hertzog
Hi, On Thu, 24 May 2018, Raphael Hertzog wrote: > Definitely! This is now even more needed because we have a few interesting > team-oriented features that really need to be documented. > > I would like https://qa.pages.debian.net/distro-tracker/ to provide > user-oriented documen

Bug#816733: PTS doesn't understand RFS bugs

2018-08-20 Thread Raphael Hertzog
Control: severity -1 wishlist Control: retitle -1 tracker.debian.org: please show sponsorship requests On Fri, 04 Mar 2016, Jakub Wilk wrote: > https://packages.qa.debian.org/o/openfst.html says: > > The WNPP database contains an entry for this package, but it is unclear > > what kind of entry it

Bug#816733: PTS doesn't understand RFS bugs

2018-08-21 Thread Raphael Hertzog
hecked a few packages listed on https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?pkg=sponsorship-requests;dist=unstable For example https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/raphael or https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/cplay So it seems that the ITA or O entry is taking precedence and is hiding the RFS one. Just confi

Bug#906954: tracker.debian.org: incorrect DUCK last update time

2018-08-22 Thread Raphael Hertzog
Hi, On Wed, 22 Aug 2018, Christian Göttsche wrote: > The URL(s) for this package had some recent persistent issues low > DUCK reports some issues concerning upstream URLs defined for this package. > Created: 2018-06-10 Last update: 2018-08-22 15:01 > > But when visiting the issues link, the page s

Re: Bug#847125: https://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/developers-reference/ch04.en.html#pkg-tracker-commands doesn't seem to be anymore :(

2018-08-24 Thread Raphael Hertzog
Hi Shirish, you sent your email to a completely unrelated bug report. I'm replying on the debian-qa mailing list to avoid polluting the bug report. On Fri, 24 Aug 2018, shirish शिरीष wrote: > https://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/developers-reference/ch04.en.html#pkg-tracker-commands > doesn't seem

Bug#907075: tracker.debian.org: please report outstanding merge requests if Vcs- fields point to salsa

2018-08-24 Thread Raphael Hertzog
Control: tag -1 + confirmed On Thu, 23 Aug 2018, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote: > I just noticed that some debian packaging projects i've worked on that > are hosted on salsa are starting to accumulate merge requests via the > gitlab interface. > > https://tracker.debian.org does a good job of collec

Bug#893995: Include searchable provides data alongside binaries in tracker

2018-08-25 Thread Raphael Hertzog
Hi, On Sun, 25 Mar 2018, Pirate Praveen wrote: > Currently provides data is missing from tracker.Debian.org > > For example ruby-flipper provides ruby-flipper-active-record but this > information is missing currently from tracker.Debian.org Can you be more specific in your request? provides is

Bug#906963: keyword subscription does not always work

2018-08-25 Thread Raphael Hertzog
Control: severity -1 important Hi, On Wed, 22 Aug 2018, Marc Haber wrote: > I would like to get the vcs messages, so I click on "Modify Keywords", > and am surprised that everything is ticket there. Regardless on which > change I make here, after clicking on "Save changes", nothing changes, > nei

Re: coordination between lintian/piuparts/adequate

2024-10-29 Thread Raphael Hertzog
Hello, On Tue, 29 Oct 2024, Louis-Philippe Véronneau wrote: > One of the strengths of lintian and piuparts is a lot of people run them > each time they build a package. Adequate needing the package to be installed > makes it harder to integrate in that workflow. > > Maybe if it was a feature in s

Re: coordination between lintian/piuparts/adequate

2024-11-04 Thread Raphael Hertzog
Hello, On Fri, 01 Nov 2024, Serafeim (Serafi) Zanikolas wrote: > > Or maybe it would help if adequate could be run in a debusine task. We > > already have tasks to run lintian and piuparts but we are lacking one for > > adequate. > > thanks for the pointer to debusine. however it seems to be mean

Bug#1088254: tracker.debian.org: seems to be severely lagging behind ci.debian.net for (at least) some packages

2024-11-27 Thread Raphael Hertzog
Hi, On Tue, 26 Nov 2024, Julian Gilbey wrote: > Hi Raphael, > > On Tue, Nov 26, 2024 at 05:29:22PM +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote: > > Hello, > > > > On Tue, 26 Nov 2024, Julian Gilbey wrote: > > > I think what happened was that the reporting from ci.debian.

Bug#1088254: tracker.debian.org: seems to be severely lagging behind ci.debian.net for (at least) some packages

2024-11-26 Thread Raphael Hertzog
Hello, On Tue, 26 Nov 2024, Julian Gilbey wrote: > I think what happened was that the reporting from ci.debian.net to > tracker.debian.org went down for a period; I manually retried all of > the tests a few hours ago, and now they are all showing on tracker > (most passed or "No tests, ...", and o

Bug#1095132: tracker.debian.org: patch to forward upstream should not appear if patch has Applied-Upstream

2025-02-04 Thread Raphael Hertzog
Hi, On Tue, 04 Feb 2025, Martin-Éric Racine wrote: > The tracker currently displays "debian/patches: 1 patch to forward > upstream". It should not appear give how the patch is applied upstream > pending the next upstream release and the cherry-pick features the > Applied-Upstream stanza. FTR here

Bug#1095132: tracker.debian.org: patch to forward upstream should not appear if patch has Applied-Upstream

2025-02-04 Thread Raphael Hertzog
On Tue, 04 Feb 2025, Raphael Hertzog wrote: > I tend to agree with you but this is under control of UDD and AFAIK UDD > is just applying what's documented in DEP-3. There have been suggestions > to update DEP-3 regarding this but nothing happened IIRC. I remember > dis

Bug#1107236: tracker.debian.org: stop showing unmaintained bullseye-backports

2025-06-03 Thread Raphael Hertzog
Hi, On Tue, 03 Jun 2025, Simon McVittie wrote: > As announced in > https://lists.debian.org/debian-backports-announce/2024/07/msg0.html, > bullseye-backports no longer accepts uploads and should not be expected to > be up-to-date with bookworm{,-security}. I think it would make sense to > dr

Bug#1107236: tracker.debian.org: stop showing unmaintained bullseye-backports

2025-06-10 Thread Raphael Hertzog
Hi, On Fri, 06 Jun 2025, Andreas Beckmann wrote: > On 6/3/25 15:05, Raphael Hertzog wrote: > > I mean it doesn't disappear from the rmadison output either, and I see > > that table as a web version of "rmadison". > > Perhaps such unsupported legacy

Bug#1107236: tracker.debian.org: stop showing unmaintained bullseye-backports

2025-06-05 Thread Raphael Hertzog
Hi, On Wed, 04 Jun 2025, Micha Lenk wrote: > > > https://lists.debian.org/debian-backports-announce/2024/07/msg0.html, > > > bullseye-backports no longer accepts uploads and should not be expected to > > > be up-to-date with bookworm{,-security}. I think it would make sense to > > > drop it fr

Bug#121332: kmail: Does not delete messages when logout

2001-11-26 Thread Raphael Derosso Pereira - DephiNit
Package: kmail Version: 4:2.1.1-7 Severity: normal This is an old problem, which I expected to be solved in newer packages, so I didn't report it before. Basically, when I delete some messages (and they go to the Trash), I have to empty the trash or get out of kmail before logging out, otherwise

Bug#122050: kghostview: cannot open ps/pdf (SIGSEGV)

2001-12-01 Thread Raphael Derosso Pereira - DephiNit
Package: kghostview Version: 4:2.1.1-6 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable It just breaks... here the backtrace... 0x40d3a8f9 in wait4 () from /lib/libc.so.6 #0 0x40d3a8f9 in wait4 () from /lib/libc.so.6 #1 0x40db31f0 in __check_rhosts_file () from /lib/libc.so.6 #2 0x4056a

<    5   6   7   8   9   10