Hi,
On Sun, 04 Mar 2018, Luca Falavigna wrote:
> Well, recent changes just changed email to
> @packages.debian.org, so I'm not convinced this is a bug in
> dak itself.
>
> Could it be the small delay while processing mails to
> @packages.qa.debian.org (which are then forwarded to
> @packages.debi
Hi,
On Mon, 05 Mar 2018, Luca Falavigna wrote:
> > It works for whatever you want. Ansgar asked me a few questions on
> > this topic recently and he said that DAK was already mailing the
> > maintainer directly so he would certainly just mail the maintainer +
> > dispatch@tracker.d.o in all cases
Hi,
On Tue, 06 Mar 2018, Thorsten Alteholz wrote:
> On Mon, 5 Mar 2018, Luca Falavigna wrote:
> > OK. Can you please indicate which header is used to reference the
> > source package when sending mails to dispatch@tracker.d.o?
>
> does [1] make sense for this?
> [1] https://salsa.debian.org/ftp-t
Hi,
On Tue, 27 Mar 2018, Chirath R wrote:
> I have made mockup designs for package overview page as part of GSoC
> project. It would be nice to get feedback on the design and if you could
> mention which fields are most important.
I find the table layout more useful. Concerning the fields, you ne
On Wed, 28 Mar 2018, Chirath R wrote:
> > - the action items should be easily accessible at least in the expanded
> > view, the number of action items by severity would thus be interesting
>
> Can I know what an action item here represents. Is it something like a
> `Newer upstream version`?
Eve
Control: tag -1 + newcomer
Hello,
On Wed, 11 Apr 2018, dequis wrote:
> The old package tracker complains that my package is "severely out of
> date", while the new one thinks it is up to date and doesn't complain
> about anything.
[...]
> < pabs> IIRC the tracker code looks at the version of the
Hello,
On Thu, 17 Jul 2014 14:49:42 +0200 Vincent Bernat wrote:
> With just unstable, I was able to do the import process with about 3.8
> GB in a little less than 3 hours.
FWIW, we are now using GitLab CI on salsa.debian.org to generate once a
week a sample database that can be download to avoi
Hi,
On Mon, 30 Apr 2018, Markus Koschany wrote:
> tracker's package overview is very helpful in gathering a lot of
> information about certain packages. It would be even more useful if
> maintainers or teams were able to add custom information to it. I
> currently count nine "tables" (lists), gene
Control: retitle -1 tracker.debian.org: manage metadata like
Vcs/Homepage/Maintainer/Uploaders
Hi Markus,
On Mon, 30 Apr 2018, Markus Koschany wrote:
> some information in packages can get quickly outdated like VCS links,
> homepage addresses or the information about the actual uploaders of
> te
Hi Arthur,
On Fri, 27 Apr 2018, Arthur Del Esposte wrote:
> We will probably start by importing the data from SALSA to the Distro
> Tracker.
Tying anything to salsa looks wrong. We want VCS data even if the
repository is not hosted on salsa.debian.org. You probably want to
have a good abstraction
Hi Matthias,
On Sun, 13 May 2018, Matthias Klose wrote:
> please bump the Ubuntu links from bionic to cosmic, showing the package
> versions
> for the most recent Ubuntu development version.
The tracker relies on data exported by UDD:
https://udd.debian.org/cgi-bin/ubuntupackages.cgi
Lucas, can
Hi,
On Mon, 21 May 2018, Lars Kruse wrote:
> recently I sent a mail to , as this is
Do you really mean "team-munin@t.d.o" and not "team+munin@t.d.o" ?
> (this issue of the missing team "munin") is about to be fixed now)
This leads me to believe that you meant the latter.
> My mail was silently
Control: tag -1 + newcomer
Control: severity -1 + important
Hello,
On Wed, 23 May 2018, Guillem Jover wrote:
> The tracker provides links to its documentation (at [T]), but that
> looks rather developer oriented. If you want to get some user
> documentation it seems that currently the main source
Hi,
On Thu, 21 Jun 2018, Lev Lazinskiy wrote:
> > This is a problem with the data model used by the tracker. The "directory"
> > field should never have been associated to a SourcePackage but to
> > its associated SourcePackageRepositoryEntry. After all the package can
> > reside on two mirrors in
Hi,
On Sun, 24 Jun 2018, Paul Wise wrote:
> The removals news items for owncloud differ from the PTS:
>
> https://packages.qa.debian.org/o/owncloud.html
>
> [2017-05-06] Removed 7.0.4+dfsg-4~deb8u4 from stable (None)
> [2016-04-26] Removed 7.0.13~dfsg-1 from unstable (None)
> [2016-04-15] ownclo
Hi,
On Tue, 26 Jun 2018, Sven Joachim wrote:
> In the VCS field on https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/$package there are
> three new links labeled changelog_distribution, changelog_version and
> package_version. Unfortunately they are all 404 compliant.
Yeah, a mistake that I already reported here:
Hello Dmitry,
On Sat, 07 Jul 2018, Dmitry Smirnov wrote:
> For a while I thought that "tracker.debian.org" is just immature
> but some time ago I've noticed that from some other networks
> Firefox load pages from tracker.debian.org just fine.
> Now I'm suspecting that somewhere we may have somethi
Hi,
On Sat, 07 Jul 2018, Dmitry Smirnov wrote:
> > Do the following commands work faster ?
> >
> > curl https://tracker.debian.org/static/css/dense.css
> > or
> > wget https://tracker.debian.org/static/css/dense.css
>
> Yes they do work faster however it is not the same as browser requests.
> B
Hi,
moving this to debian...@lists.debian.org. debian-qa is of no help here.
Thanks.
On Tue, 17 Jul 2018, Drew Parsons wrote:
> The configuration of ci.debian.org is not consistent. A failing test
> of deal.ii is marked on
> https://ci.debian.net/packages/d/deal.ii/testing/amd64/
> as trigge
Hi,
On Thu, 26 Jul 2018, Paul Wise wrote:
> The href target for the link in the "NN bugs tagged patch in the BTS"
> action is empty. Here is an example from glibc:
>
> 45 bugs tagged patch in the BTS
>
> https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/glibc
>
> Since the link is present in another part of t
Control: tag -1 + newcomer
Hi Adam,
thanks for the report.
On Thu, 26 Jul 2018, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/postgresql-9.6 reports both that the
> package is "not in any development repository", and that "[t]he package
> is severely out of date with respect to the Deb
Hi,
On Thu, 24 May 2018, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> Definitely! This is now even more needed because we have a few interesting
> team-oriented features that really need to be documented.
>
> I would like https://qa.pages.debian.net/distro-tracker/ to provide
> user-oriented documen
Control: severity -1 wishlist
Control: retitle -1 tracker.debian.org: please show sponsorship requests
On Fri, 04 Mar 2016, Jakub Wilk wrote:
> https://packages.qa.debian.org/o/openfst.html says:
> > The WNPP database contains an entry for this package, but it is unclear
> > what kind of entry it
hecked a few packages listed on
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?pkg=sponsorship-requests;dist=unstable
For example https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/raphael or
https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/cplay
So it seems that the ITA or O entry is taking precedence and is hiding the
RFS one. Just confi
Hi,
On Wed, 22 Aug 2018, Christian Göttsche wrote:
> The URL(s) for this package had some recent persistent issues low
> DUCK reports some issues concerning upstream URLs defined for this package.
> Created: 2018-06-10 Last update: 2018-08-22 15:01
>
> But when visiting the issues link, the page s
Hi Shirish,
you sent your email to a completely unrelated bug report. I'm replying
on the debian-qa mailing list to avoid polluting the bug report.
On Fri, 24 Aug 2018, shirish शिरीष wrote:
> https://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/developers-reference/ch04.en.html#pkg-tracker-commands
> doesn't seem
Control: tag -1 + confirmed
On Thu, 23 Aug 2018, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
> I just noticed that some debian packaging projects i've worked on that
> are hosted on salsa are starting to accumulate merge requests via the
> gitlab interface.
>
> https://tracker.debian.org does a good job of collec
Hi,
On Sun, 25 Mar 2018, Pirate Praveen wrote:
> Currently provides data is missing from tracker.Debian.org
>
> For example ruby-flipper provides ruby-flipper-active-record but this
> information is missing currently from tracker.Debian.org
Can you be more specific in your request?
provides is
Control: severity -1 important
Hi,
On Wed, 22 Aug 2018, Marc Haber wrote:
> I would like to get the vcs messages, so I click on "Modify Keywords",
> and am surprised that everything is ticket there. Regardless on which
> change I make here, after clicking on "Save changes", nothing changes,
> nei
Hello,
On Tue, 29 Oct 2024, Louis-Philippe Véronneau wrote:
> One of the strengths of lintian and piuparts is a lot of people run them
> each time they build a package. Adequate needing the package to be installed
> makes it harder to integrate in that workflow.
>
> Maybe if it was a feature in s
Hello,
On Fri, 01 Nov 2024, Serafeim (Serafi) Zanikolas wrote:
> > Or maybe it would help if adequate could be run in a debusine task. We
> > already have tasks to run lintian and piuparts but we are lacking one for
> > adequate.
>
> thanks for the pointer to debusine. however it seems to be mean
Hi,
On Tue, 26 Nov 2024, Julian Gilbey wrote:
> Hi Raphael,
>
> On Tue, Nov 26, 2024 at 05:29:22PM +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > On Tue, 26 Nov 2024, Julian Gilbey wrote:
> > > I think what happened was that the reporting from ci.debian.
Hello,
On Tue, 26 Nov 2024, Julian Gilbey wrote:
> I think what happened was that the reporting from ci.debian.net to
> tracker.debian.org went down for a period; I manually retried all of
> the tests a few hours ago, and now they are all showing on tracker
> (most passed or "No tests, ...", and o
Hi,
On Tue, 04 Feb 2025, Martin-Éric Racine wrote:
> The tracker currently displays "debian/patches: 1 patch to forward
> upstream". It should not appear give how the patch is applied upstream
> pending the next upstream release and the cherry-pick features the
> Applied-Upstream stanza.
FTR here
On Tue, 04 Feb 2025, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> I tend to agree with you but this is under control of UDD and AFAIK UDD
> is just applying what's documented in DEP-3. There have been suggestions
> to update DEP-3 regarding this but nothing happened IIRC. I remember
> dis
Hi,
On Tue, 03 Jun 2025, Simon McVittie wrote:
> As announced in
> https://lists.debian.org/debian-backports-announce/2024/07/msg0.html,
> bullseye-backports no longer accepts uploads and should not be expected to
> be up-to-date with bookworm{,-security}. I think it would make sense to
> dr
Hi,
On Fri, 06 Jun 2025, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
> On 6/3/25 15:05, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> > I mean it doesn't disappear from the rmadison output either, and I see
> > that table as a web version of "rmadison".
>
> Perhaps such unsupported legacy
Hi,
On Wed, 04 Jun 2025, Micha Lenk wrote:
> > > https://lists.debian.org/debian-backports-announce/2024/07/msg0.html,
> > > bullseye-backports no longer accepts uploads and should not be expected to
> > > be up-to-date with bookworm{,-security}. I think it would make sense to
> > > drop it fr
Package: kmail
Version: 4:2.1.1-7
Severity: normal
This is an old problem, which I expected to be solved in newer packages,
so I didn't report it before.
Basically, when I delete some messages (and they go to the Trash), I
have to empty the trash or get out of kmail before logging out, otherwise
Package: kghostview
Version: 4:2.1.1-6
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
It just breaks... here the backtrace...
0x40d3a8f9 in wait4 () from /lib/libc.so.6
#0 0x40d3a8f9 in wait4 () from /lib/libc.so.6
#1 0x40db31f0 in __check_rhosts_file () from /lib/libc.so.6
#2 0x4056a
901 - 940 of 940 matches
Mail list logo