header from the package.
* debian/dirs is redundant here.
I cannot sponsor the package for you though.
James
--
James Westby --GPG Key ID: B577FE13-- http://jameswestby.net/
seccure key - (3+)k7|M*edCX/.A:n*N!>|&7U.L#9E)Tu)T0>AM - secp256r1/nistp256
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE,
On (16/09/06 21:34), Kapil Hari Paranjape wrote:
> On Sat, 16 Sep 2006, James Westby wrote:
> > * The debian/copyright file is lacking. There is no copyright
> > information, what is referred to as Copyright is in fact a License,
> > and not a copy of a license he
layer-doc, and so the manpages wont be
installed with the binaries in many cases. I think this is more
important for the locales though.
Apologies for the extra stuff in the interdiff.
James
--
James Westby --GPG Key ID: B577FE13-- http://jameswestby.net/
seccure key - (3+)k7|M*edCX
have some packages that I was preparing for a QA upload before I
realised how tough I was going to find these bugs. I have stalled work
on the packages, as without these bugs fixed it will not, nor should
not, be included in etch.
James
--
James Westby --GPG Key ID: B577FE13-- http://j
to release 1.9 soon.
>
> I am willing to adopt "dvipng" and ask for a sponsor if the package
> is declared "orphaned".
>
It has just been orphaned by the QA team, so you can go ahead and adopt
it now.
James
--
James Westby --GPG Key ID: B577FE13
er of failures that you have to cope with of this sort.
Thanks,
James
--
James Westby --GPG Key ID: B577FE13-- http://jameswestby.net/
seccure key - (3+)k7|M*edCX/.A:n*N!>|&7U.L#9E)Tu)T0>AM - secp256r1/nistp256
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a
Hi,
The bfr package is QA maintained, but has no bugs and 77 installs, 20
votes.
However the main reason for removing it would seem to be that the
functionality is provided by our trusty friend |
Anyone object to me filling a removal request?
Thanks,
James
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL
Hi all,
The dag2html package is badly in need of some love
http://packages.qa.debian.org/d/dag2html.html
Would the pkg-ocaml team be willing to take it over
and make it build again? If not is it a valid candidate
for removal?
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=443029
The first er
On Wed, 2008-03-26 at 10:15 -0400, Barry deFreese wrote:
> Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 10:00:16PM +0000, James Westby wrote:
> >
> >> Would the pkg-ocaml team be willing to take it over
> >> and make it build again? If not is it a
On Sun, 2008-03-30 at 11:14 +0900, Paul Wise wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 29, 2008 at 9:48 PM, James Westby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > Is it even worth it? It's buggy, has a popcon of 12, and hasn't seen an
> > > upstream update since 2001?? My vote wou
On Tue, 2008-04-01 at 18:38 +0200, Christian Perrier wrote:
> Quoting James Westby ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
>
> > For the geneweb part I am Ccing Christian. Christian, do you know of
> > anybody that would be interested in the dag2html package? Would it
> > be worth
Hi,
Some fixes had built up in Ubuntu's ncpfs package, and as the package
is QA maintained I rolled a proposed update for Debian. Would someone
kindly review and sponsor my package at
http://people.ubuntu.com/~jamesw/packages/ncpfs_2.2.6-6/ncpfs_2.2.6-6.dsc
I haven't been able to test it in acti
On Thu, 2009-01-15 at 17:14 +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
> On Thu, 15 Jan 2009, James Westby wrote:
>
> > Some fixes had built up in Ubuntu's ncpfs package, and as the package
> > is QA maintained I rolled a proposed update for Debian. Would someone
> > kindly rev
On Thu, 2009-01-15 at 17:14 +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
> On Thu, 15 Jan 2009, James Westby wrote:
>
> > Some fixes had built up in Ubuntu's ncpfs package, and as the package
> > is QA maintained I rolled a proposed update for Debian. Would someone
> > kindly rev
Hi,
Last year I did a QA upload of ncpfs, however there was an Ubuntu bug
reported when it landed in Ubuntu that gcc changes caused it to break:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/328020
Steven Harms proposed a patch for the package, so I am submitting it
here for inclusion in Debian.
I must ad
o date pbuilder and some spare cycles it should be fairly
easy for you to rebuild some packages.
James
--
James Westby --GPG Key ID: B577FE13-- http://jameswestby.net/
seccure key - (3+)k7|M*edCX/.A:n*N!>|&7U.L#9E)Tu)T0>AM - secp256r1/nistp256
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email t
16 matches
Mail list logo
