On Wed, 2008-03-26 at 10:15 -0400, Barry deFreese wrote: > Stefano Zacchiroli wrote: > > On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 10:00:16PM +0000, James Westby wrote: > > > >> Would the pkg-ocaml team be willing to take it over > >> and make it build again? If not is it a valid candidate > >> for removal? > >> > > > > Personally I'm not, though of course I'm in favour of having it in the > > pkg-ocaml-maint team as it would be a good idea for the sake of > > uniformity. However this does not solve the lack of manpower problem. > > Any other taker from d-o-m? > > > > Cheers. > > > Is it even worth it? It's buggy, has a popcon of 12, and hasn't seen an > upstream update since 2001?? My vote would be for removal.
I agree, and I haven't seen any interest in picking it up. Would anyone object to me filing a removal request? Thanks, James -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
