g the actual checks to the
`duck` perl library. To work with distro-tracker I would need to drop
that an implement something silimar in python. Not a huge task per se,
but something to keep in mind.
I'm not sure what is best here and I'm looking forward to your
suggestions and remarks.
On 6/29/20 11:34 PM, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> On Mon, 29 Jun 2020, Baptiste BEAUPLAT wrote:
>>> Indeed, creating a dedicated service for this does not seem a good idea.
>>
>> I would love to have this feature integrated directly with
>> distro-tracker. However, I
:
https://salsa.debian.org/debian/duck/-/tree/master/lib/checks
--
Baptiste BEAUPLAT - lyknode
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
and distributions.
From what I can see in the DMD page, it fetches from UDD's tables:
- package name
- version
- distribution
- uploaded date
From that, distribution is actually unused. So fetching the list of all
uploads and storing that into a single table sould be sufficient.
--
Baptiste
On 8/15/20 10:54 AM, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> On 01/08/20 at 14:07 +0200, Baptiste BEAUPLAT wrote:
>> On 8/1/20 9:01 AM, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
>>> Hi Baptiste,
>>>
>>> I think that it would be better if mentors.d.n would provide a JSON
>>> export of i
Hi Lucas,
The API is in production on mentors.
I've worked a bit on udd and came up with a proposal:
https://salsa.debian.org/qa/udd/-/merge_requests/29
Best,
--
Baptiste BEAUPLAT - lyknode
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
file dd-list.txt
The MIA Team might want to have look at maintainers that have other
packages (Other packages column in the CSV).
Let me know if I shouldn't process with orphaning those packages,
otherwise, I'll do so in a week.
[1]: https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2020/12/msg00419
On 1/13/21 1:17 AM, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 12, 2021 at 09:43:20PM +0100, Baptiste Beauplat wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Following Holger's no-change source-only uploads to have all binaries
>> built on buildd [1], a couple of RC bugs have been opened be
Small update on those packages:
On 2021/01/17 09:53 PM, Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Tue, Jan 12, 2021 at 09:43:20PM +0100, Baptiste Beauplat wrote:
> > While discussing on #debian-qa how to handle those bugs on packages
> > without reachable maintainer, Matti
nted that this is
not helping an archive wide QA check.
There was some talk about reviving duck.debian.net as part of
distro-tracker [1][2], unfortunatly, I haven't managed to free enough time
to start working on it (being busy on other projects ATM).
[1]: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=963887
[2]: https://salsa.debian.org/qa/distro-tracker/-/issues/51
--
Baptiste Beauplat - lyknode
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
ld make it much easier.
Sure, I'll have a look before next week.
Best,
--
Baptiste Beauplat
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
etail": "Informative message",
"certainty": "possible" # optional key
}},
...
]
```
Let me know what you think of it.
> Then UDD could process source packages to extract URLs, check those
> URLs
> on a regular basis (similarly to what is done for lintian), and
> publish/export the results in all relevant places.
Best,
--
Baptiste Beauplat
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Hi Lucas,
On Wed, 2023-10-25 at 20:57 +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> On 08/08/23 at 06:42 +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> > Hi Baptiste,
> >
> > On 07/08/23 at 22:07 +0200, Baptiste Beauplat wrote:
> > > Hi Lucas,
> > >
> > > On 2023-08-03 10:30,
13 matches
Mail list logo