On Fri, 6 Oct 2006, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote:
Combined, I don't think fixing the RC bug(s) is worth the effort for the
package in its current state.
Even as Debian-Med adictive person I would say:
When you discover you are riding a dead horse,
the best strategy is to dismount.
So lets remov
Hi,
I also stumbled upon this problem. Any news since three years?
It is just unusual if Debian provides a package that contains
server features but there is not even a hint in the docs
(for instance README.Debian) how to start the server. If I
personally would maintain such a package I would e
an Garabik wrote:
On Wed, Jul 19, 2006 at 01:23:34AM +0200, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
* Andreas Tille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-07-18 15:06]:
http://lists.debian.org/debian-qa/2006/03/msg00089.html
I asked whether we might want to remove serpento. I'd vote for
it but my question
On Thu, 13 Dec 2007, Kumar Appaiah wrote:
I am trying to help out by finding rdepends of packages in the oldlibs
section, and am hoping that cleaning up the oldlibs section could be
made a Lenny release goal (distant dream).
You should probably define "cleaning up oldlibs" more precisely.
I do
On Wed, 9 Jan 2008, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
Given Matthew's reasons for resigning, I think it would be
respectful to spare him the emails
Well, if there is no better communication channel than e-mail
I would go for it starting: I would like to consider your wish
to not to get any Debian rel
Hi,
I'm maintaining the package fastdnaml and wanted to move the Homepage
information I putted into the long description formerly to the Homepage
tag of the control file. When doing so I verified that the home page is
correct but failed. The project seems to have vanished from the web.
I have t
On Sun, 17 Feb 2008, Jack T Mudge III wrote:
AFAICT, it would seem that didiwiki is in this group as well. I found plenty
of links to it's nonexistant homepage. It's a frusterating situation, since
most users (myself included) expect to be able to go to the homepage and
find out more about the p
On Sun, 17 Feb 2008, Alexander Schmehl wrote:
Well, I would say, that if only usefull purpouse of the homepage was to
download the tarball, than you can just drop the homepage header;
appearently the user has no nead for the tarball ;)
Well, you are right that there is no need to point to a pu
On Mon, 18 Feb 2008, Alexander Schmehl wrote:
No, I meant archive.org (not .com as I wrote previously, sorry). They
archive web pages like a library (see for example
http://web.archive.org/web/19970502070835/http://www.debian.org/), and
maybe the have the documentation pages of your software ar
On Mon, 18 Feb 2008, Kapil Hari Paranjape wrote:
On Mon, 18 Feb 2008, Alexander Schmehl wrote:
Well, a third and fourth alternative would be to download the
documentation from archive.org, and (assuming you have the right for
distribution) but them in a -doc package or put it on
people.debian.o
On Mon, 18 Feb 2008, Russ Allbery wrote:
One low-tech thing that one could do is just put, in the package long
description, a note that the software is dead upstream. Personally, I
think that's often information worthy of being in the long description;
one purpose of the long description, after
On Tue, 11 Mar 2008, Barry deFreese wrote:
It's been a while. newpki-client was finally just uploaded with my wx2.6
patch (apparently after some patch fixing wrt to whitespace issues :-( )
Anyway, the last holdout is ctsim. Has anyone heard more from the ctsim
maintainer?
Are we going to
On Wed, 12 Mar 2008, Barry deFreese wrote:
I tried this a while back also. Kevin is upstream bye the way. Last time I
spoke with him via e-mail, he was more interested in wx2.8 or 3.0 but now
that he is the proverbial "last man standing" he might be persuaded, I don't
know.
Well, I don't c
Package: qa.debian.org
Severity: normal
Hi,
the page
http://packages.qa.debian.org/w/wordnet.html
lists only a wishlist bug against dict-wn (#432528) but not the
grave security issue against wordnet (#481186). The page says
Last modified : Fri May 16 08:41:15 UTC 2008.
while the bug
On Fri, 13 Jun 2008, Ana Guerrero wrote:
reopen 483179
retitle 483179 PTS: please *do not* link to Ubuntu Launchpad bugs page
thanks
...
09:41 ana: and accept my decision as PTS maintainer
...
About buxy's second sentence, it is not at all a way to "finish" a discussion.
Accept my disagreement
On Wed, 16 Jul 2008, Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
science-physics on http://qa.debian.org/developer.php should do this,
but it returns the page
http://qa.debian.org/developer.php?task=science-physics which says "No
information available for Task: science-physics".
I wonder why you think this shoul
On Thu, 17 Jul 2008, Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
Yeah, "task" here really means "task as understood by tasksel/defined by
Packages file", not "something similar to a task implemented as metapackage".
On the other hand: the Package science-tasks just provides a task
science-physics (and others) ..
On Fri, 18 Jul 2008, Chris Walker wrote:
What I want is a way of keeping an eye on packages in one of these
metapackages to see that they are at least vaguely up to date and not
full of RC bugs. I was then going to add it to
http://wiki.debian.org/DebianScience in the hope that scientists will
h
On Fri, 18 Jul 2008, Chris Walker wrote:
Yes exactly what I was after - except that it doesn't track the
upstream versions.
Well, this is a subject for my (your ;-)) todo list. BTW, would you
regard it reasonable to split the bug pages according to single tasks
or not. Currently the page jus
On Sun, 20 Jul 2008, Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
openmotif: popcon 782/90/347/32/313, looong orphaned, non-free, RC bug,
rdepends: arb, motv, was part of oldstable
-> keep in unstable, prod arb maintainer, remove motv
I'm the maintainer of arb. The former version of arb had serious trouble with
On Mon, 28 Jul 2008, Chris Walker wrote:
I guess you want this
http://debian-med.alioth.debian.org/bugs.php
for Debian Science, right?
Yes exactly what I was after - except that it doesn't track the
upstream versions.
BTW, we also track upstream versions via
http://debian-med.alioth
On Sat, 16 Aug 2008, Sandro Tosi wrote:
On Sat, Aug 16, 2008 at 11:22, Vincent Bernat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I would have prefered that you converted the package to some patch
management system but since this is a QA upload, I have uploaded it
anyway.
Yeah, it's a good idea, an
On Tue, 26 Aug 2008, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
Your message dated Tue, 26 Aug 2008 06:47:03 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#492503: fixed in feh 1.3.4.dfsg.1-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #492503,
regarding ITA: feh -- imlib2 based image viewer
to be m
On Tue, 26 Aug 2008, Russ Allbery wrote:
Why not just use collab-maint for this?
Good question - I was just as unaware about this project as I was
about wnpp-alert script. :-(
Is it just me that I'm ignorant about important pieces of information
or is it just not well enough advertised?
Tech
On Tue, 26 Aug 2008, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
This idea cames up on a regular basis. I think that the consensus is
that it's better to simply use the Debian archive as VCS. When you
change/fix something in an orphaned package, just upload ;)
Well, OK, this might make some sense if you just not in
On Tue, 26 Aug 2008, Y Giridhar Appaji Nag wrote:
You probably do not follow the low volume debian-news mailing list
See http://lists.debian.org/debian-news/2006/msg00016.html
Well, yes, I do not follow this list. I've thought d-d-a is enough.
It is a little bit hard to decide which channel
Hi,
I would like to ask for comments on my plan to find a reasonable way to
produce QA pages for a "certain set of packages". The idea behind this
is that David Paleino has created nice pages for Debian Med at
http://debian-med.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/qareport.cgi
which is an adaptation o
On Wed, 24 Sep 2008, Paul Wise wrote:
DDPO supports subscribing to more packages, see the info here:
http://qa.debian.org/developer.php
So your suggestion would be to write a CGI script that obtains
the packages in question and feed this as argument to
http://qa.debian.org/developer.php?pa
On Wed, 24 Sep 2008, Paul Wise wrote:
Er, you didn't read down the page far enough (see the "Subscribing to
Packages" heading).
Whenever you want a new package to be monitored by DDPO for your team,
send a mail:
I do not really want to subscribe and I also think that the general
mail address
On Thu, 25 Sep 2008, Paul Wise wrote:
It isn't subscribing in the email list sense, it is just adding those
packages to the DDPO page for a certain email address.
Yes and this does not work as intended because we have one single
email address for more than one page to display (several sections
On Thu, 25 Sep 2008, Paul Wise wrote:
IIRC it isn't possible to use addresses that are not in Maintainers or
Uploaders with DDPO. I guess DDPO isn't for you then.
OK.
This directs the mail to the DDPO mail bot:
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
This sets the user to the Debian Med packaging team:
use
On Thu, 25 Sep 2008, Paul Wise wrote:
(hope that these anchors links will be set - if not its probably easy
to create a patch.)
Seems they are set, no patch needed.
Yes, you are right.
But it seems that this method does not in all cases work reliable:
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Sep 25 23
On Tue, 28 Oct 2008, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
Enrico Zini have ad for a while some code which find package
similarities, in fact I believe it is the one used on
packages.debian.org to show "similar packages".
H, what means "similar packages"? I really can not imagine
some code that detec
On Tue, 28 Oct 2008, Holger Levsen wrote:
If this has left the state of discussion and has become a fact, can we have a
mail on d-d-a about this please?!
Yes, we can and we will have. I just need some time for recovering
from offline backlog - I hope to get something out at the weekend.
BTW,
On Tue, 28 Oct 2008, Enrico Zini wrote:
You bet. You can do it by looking for packages with similar tags, or
clustering them according to similarity in the description. Or both.
Ahh, detecting similarities based on tags - sure, what else should I
have expected if it was code from Enrico. ;-)
On Tue, 28 Oct 2008, Enrico Zini wrote:
No, not just tags: Xapian has features to compute similarity based on whatever
you index: you can put popcon into the mix, or dependencies, or keywords from
/usr/share/{doc,man}, or whatever really.
Shame on you that you did not reported about this in Ma
On Wed, 29 Oct 2008, Paul Wise wrote:
Yes, I have seen these nice tools and I'm thinking about this. But I really
hope that the ideas to maintain screenshots more generally inside Debian
(there were several suggestions on the lists - but no implementation as far
as I know :-(). Once this is im
Hi Raphaël,
I like your proposal in principle, but I see some problem with
group maintenance. While I'm in principle a supporter of group
maintenance I do not see how it should work with your proposal.
Who in the group will be addressed by your proposal? You are
talking about a "passive" mainta
Hello,
I noticed that the watch file for dcmtk
version=3
ftp://dicom.offis.de/pub/dicom/offis/software/dcmtk/dcmtk([\d\.]+)/dcmtk-(.*)\.tar.gz
does not work properly.
$ uscan --verbose
-- Scanning for watchfiles in .
-- Found watchfile in ./debian
-- In debian/watch, processing watchfile line:
On Wed, 14 Jan 2009, Sandro Tosi wrote:
No it does, add a --pasv option:
Thanks for the hint. It does not yet work behind my proxy, but it works
on alioth and thus it is fine. I added passive option anyway because
it makes error messages slightly better readable on my side.
Sorry for the no
On Thu, 15 Jan 2009, James Westby wrote:
Some fixes had built up in Ubuntu's ncpfs package, and as the package
is QA maintained I rolled a proposed update for Debian. Would someone
kindly review and sponsor my package at
http://people.ubuntu.com/~jamesw/packages/ncpfs_2.2.6-6/ncpfs_2.2.6-6.dsc
On Thu, 15 Jan 2009, James Westby wrote:
E: ncpfs source: outdated-autotools-helper-file contrib/php/config.sub
2003-10-07
E: ncpfs source: outdated-autotools-helper-file contrib/php/config.guess
2003-10-07
These I should have fixed I realise.
Yes.
W: ncpfs: binary-without-manpage sbin/m
Hi,
as you can read in my lightning talk at DebConf
http://people.debian.org/~tille/talks/200808_lightning/
I did some investigation on who is frequently posting
on our mailing lists. I now created graphs until
end of last year and write a short summary for
those lists I regard worth a comme
On Tue, 27 Jan 2009, James Westby wrote:
I have just put an updated package at
http://people.ubuntu.com/~jamesw/packages/ncpfs_2.2.6-6/ncpfs_2.2.6-6.dsc
Thanks. Just uploading the sponsored package.
The remaining lintian issues are:
W: ncpfs source: ancient-libtool contrib/php/ltmain.sh 1
On Fri, 13 Feb 2009, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
Well, January is over. ;-)
Any news regarding watch file information.
erm, no, unfortunately. Want to work on it? :-)
I prefer to work on things I have enough knowledge first - perhaps
some people who harvested watch file information at other places
On Fri, 13 Feb 2009, Adeodato Simó wrote:
http://ftp-master.debian.org/new.822
Looks good. Any hint how to reasonably obtain
description of binaries
long_description of binaries
homepage
license(perhaps)
The html page has links to
http://ftp-master.debi
On Fri, 13 Feb 2009, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
Are you interested in DEHS (whether a given package is up-to-date or
not), or in the raw debian/watch content?
I think two fields of information are needed:
boolean is_up_to_date
text upstream_version
from packages table if you have
Hi,
I would like to include information about packages residing
in the new queue into Blends tasks pages. Because I decided
to use UDD as main source of information for these pages I
would like to inject information about new queue into UDD
first. I've got a hint to
http://ftp-master.debian
On Fri, 13 Feb 2009, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
-- Sources
CREATE TABLE new_sources (
source text,
version text,
maintainer text,
maintainer_name text,
maintainer_email text,
bin text, -- by parsing
http://ftp-master.debian.org/new/_.html#ds
On Sun, 15 Feb 2009, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
Or should we rather start to just move the information of
http://ftp-master.debian.org/new.822
into UDD for the moment and "wait".
Yeah, it would make sense to:
- add all the info from new.822 to UDD
- file a bug about exporting the other missing i
Hi,
I realised that UDD contains several entries in the packages
table with only different architecture. Did I missed something
or would it make sense to create a lookup table
CREATE table package_architecture_lookup (
package text,
architecture text,
);
and remove the architectur
On Thu, 19 Feb 2009, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
and remove the architecture column from the packages table?
Packages can have different on different
architectures, so you would lose information by doing that.
If this is the case (I just trust you) my suggestion is not
really good - but I'm aston
On Thu, 19 Feb 2009, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
Well, Depends: can obviously change between architectures. And there's
no reason why other fields wouldn't be different as well, since control
files are generated on a per-arch basis during the build process.
OK, I'm definitely convinced in this aspec
On Thu, 19 Feb 2009, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
Having a big single table might be a performance win compared to several
shorter tables that you would often need to join.
Yes - I kept this in mind but wanted t hear your opinion about this.
Also, during import, for each package, you would need to
what information Andreas Tille wanted from DEHS in UDD?
Quote from http://lists.debian.org/debian-qa/2009/02/msg00027.html
I think two fields of information are needed:
boolean is_up_to_date
text upstream_version
If you think more information makes sense it is fine - but these
two f
Hi,
DEHS is reporting new versions of GNUmed with the current watch file
which says:
http://www.gnumed.de/downloads/client/([\d\.]+)/GNUmed-client\.(.*)\.tgz
These "new" versions are only release candidates (0.4-rc\d) which should
not be packaged (as I agreed with upstream). So I might live
On Mon, 23 Feb 2009, Paul Wise wrote:
So I wonder whether I missed some trick in my watch file or whether this
should rather be regarded as an uscan bug which should go back to the
directory with the next lower version number and scan the files there.
Until uscan gets smarter about cases like
On Mon, 23 Feb 2009, Paul Wise wrote:
There doesn't appear to be a bug open about it and IMO such a feature
would probably be useful so I'd suggest filing one.
#516704
Thanks
Andreas.
--
http://fam-tille.de
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subjec
On Mon, 23 Feb 2009, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
I believe this boils down to basically the same request as #375138,
which has been marked wontfix for a couple of years.
I admit this seems to be the same problem - sorry fo not verifying
BTS properly.
I haven't merged
them yet as I'm undecided as
On Fri, 13 Feb 2009, Andreas Tille wrote:
http://ftp.debian.org/debian/dists//main/i18n/
and injects the following structure in UDD:
package, language, version, distribution, release, component (='main'),
description, long_description
Sounds good. Maybe reorder
On Wed, 25 Feb 2009, Andreas Tille wrote:
Regarding the version number I found
http://svn.debian.org/viewsvn/collab-qa/udd/sql/debvercmp.sql?view=markup
which contains a function which implements `dpkg --compare-versions` in SQL
which would be really handy for my task. Unfortunately this
On Mon, 2 Mar 2009, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
The plan is to switch to Roger Leigh's work in UDD as well, but someone
needs to do the work, and unfortunately, i'm very busy currently. See
http://git.debian.org/?p=users/rleigh/sbuild.git;a=tree;f=db;hb=81fd39259953853632a7d0e2198cfc745d270fe3
for his
On Mon, 23 Feb 2009, Paul Wise wrote:
Until uscan gets smarter about cases like these, how about this?
version=3
http://www.gnumed.de/download/ \
http://www.gnumed.de/downloads/client/[\d\.]+/GNUmed-client\.([\d\.]+)\.tgz
Hmmm, this worked as long as 0.3.10 was the latest version but now
h
On Mon, 2 Mar 2009, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
Looks good. Any hint how to reasonably obtain
description of binaries
long_description of binaries
homepage
license(perhaps)
Regarding (short) description I have this file generated daily using
UDD available for dow
Hi,
at Linux-Tage Chemnitz I've got a request from a user who reported
a bug including patch against xfig which did not recieved any
reesponse by the maintainer. Looking at the bug page of Roland
I wonder whether he is MIA and his packages should be taken over
by Debian QA.
Kind regards
On Sat, 14 Mar 2009, Roland Rosenfeld wrote:
You're right, I don't have too much time for Debian at the moment, but
I don't think I'm MIA.
Fine.
But xfig is a special case. I'm waiting for the upstream maintainer
who sent me a pre release of his package without public releasing it
and after
On Sat, 14 Mar 2009, Luk Claes wrote:
I would rather think of forming an inter-distribution team (per package
or globaly if that would make sense) to take over upstream. For
bash-completion that worked out very well.
That's what I mean. I have no idea whether per package or globaly
is better.
On Fri, 13 Feb 2009, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
It depends on your data source. I'm not familiar with DDTP. If (package,
version) is enough as a primary key, let's just use that.
I commited a ddtp importer to collab-qa/udd. It is based on DDTP translation
files which are enriched by the package ve
On Tue, 17 Mar 2009, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
On 17/03/09 at 08:51 +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
2. sql/ddtp.sql
Create the table in UDD. Some fields contain comments. I wonder
whether we should relay on the inline comments in this file or
whether we should implement "COMME
On Wed, 18 Mar 2009, Martijn van Oosterhout wrote:
On Tue, Mar 17, 2009 at 8:51 AM, Andreas Tille wrote:
To tackle this I tried to calculate MD5 sums of the package descriptions
which turned out quite error prone. The code became hard to read hacky
and not really reliable (perhaps it is
On Mon, 23 Mar 2009, David Paleino wrote:
Aww... and I thought I had wrote an useful program. :(
Neverminds, going back to my NEW gui (yes, NEW, the queue :)
Might be the same here: I'm currently busy writing a NEW queue UDD
gatherer. So at some point in time it might be better to base
your
Hi,
what is the method / policy to fill the field 'task' in the table packages of
UDD? If I try for example
udd=# SELECT CASE WHEN length(task) < 60 THEN task ELSE substring(task for 56)
|| '...' END AS tasks, count(*) from packages group by task limit 30;
tasks
Hi,
the UDD wiki page [1] gives the following advise:
o From merkel.debian.org: /usr/lib/postgresql/8.3/bin/psql 'service=udd'
This gives a psql session - but it seems not to be the up to date UDD:
ti...@merkel:~$ /usr/lib/postgresql/8.3/bin/psql -q 'service=udd'
udd=> \d packages
ERROR: c
On Fri, May 15, 2009 at 10:10:22AM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> > ti...@merkel:~$ /usr/lib/postgresql/8.3/bin/psql -q 'service=udd'
> > udd=> \d packages
> > ERROR: column "reltriggers" does not exist
> > LINE 1: SELECT relhasindex, relkind, relchecks, reltriggers, relhasr...
> >
On Fri, May 15, 2009 at 10:26:34AM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> could you add that to the wiki?
Done.
> DSA and alioth admins are aware of it.
Fine.
Kind regards
Andreas.
--
http://fam-tille.de
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "uns
Hi,
if I try for instance
SELECT MAX(version) FROM packages WHERE package = 'gcc' GROUP BY version
order by version desc;
max
4:4.3.3-5
4:4.3.3-3
4:4.3.2-2
4:4.2.4-5
4:4.1.1-15
(5 rows)
I get several maximum versions of the package gcc. Am I missing something
or is
On Sat, May 16, 2009 at 08:42:25PM +0100, Roger Leigh wrote:
> Is it possible that the GROUP BY is making the max() function
> operate on the versions within each group (which will be
> identical due to being grouped), therefore returning
> multiple group results?
Yes, I think I was somehow tricke
Hi,
I observed encoding problems when reading descriptions from
UDD if they do contain non-ASCII characters and I wonder
what I might do wrong. Here is a little test program which
queries for some descriptions I found to be problematic:
#!
On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 06:36:39PM +0200, Adeodato Simó wrote:
> UDD just has the descriptions from Packages.gz, which supposedly are in
> UTF-8. If your destination (a file, terminal, whatever) should be
> receiving UTF-8, you can just pass them unmodified, eg.:
>
> for row in curs.fetchall()
Hi,
I realised that cimg-dev package was not updated since
nearly two days. Two bugs requesting an update to
more recent upstream version (#399846, #497672) one
of them is even blocking an other package were ignored.
I would volunteer to upgrade to new upstream version,
but I would not really li
On Sat, May 30, 2009 at 01:12:31PM +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Andreas Tille (29/05/2009):
> > I realised that cimg-dev package was not updated since nearly two
> > days.
>
> OH MY! :D
;-)
s/days/years/
Sorry
Andreas.
--
http://fam-tille.de
--
To UNSUBSCRIB
On Sun, May 31, 2009 at 03:28:27PM +0200, Daniel Leidert wrote:
> Committed yesterday. I cannot upload the package, but you can, if you
> need it. IIRC the build hung on an i386 system when I tested 1.2.9. That
> might need some investigation.
I just compiled
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/p
Hi,
I tried to read the vcs_browser field from udd sources table and wondered
why all my packages are missing such a field. A wuicl query revealed:
udd=# SELECT release, source, vcs_type, vcs_url, vcs_browser FROM sources WHERE
vcs_browser is not null ORDER by SOURCE;
release| s
On Mon, Jun 08, 2009 at 10:28:37PM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> On 08/06/09 at 14:35 +0200, Olivier Berger wrote:
> > Btw, I'm not sure if/how we can plan some UDD-related discussions
> > @debconf... not having participated to debconf earlier... I suppose
> > we'll manage to find a place with cer
On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 09:49:27AM +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> UDD has some parts that are Postgres specific, in particular it uses
> the Postgres extension mechanism to internalize Debian version
> comparison so that it can be exploited in queries. In the beginning,
> the internalization wa
Hi,
I would like to announce here the tables I added to UDD
ddtp: Translations of Debian package descriptions provided
by the ddtp project[1]
new_packages / new_sources:
Pakcages in NEW queue[2]
screenshots:
screenshots of packages[3]
All this info is used by Debian
On Sat, Jun 20, 2009 at 05:50:19PM +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> Out of curiosity, why did you need to import the screenshots data,
> given that screenshots.d.n already exports a RESTful interface. What
> were you missing from that interface?
Well, I do not know about this interface but impor
On Sat, Jun 20, 2009 at 09:47:31PM +0200, Sandro Tosi wrote:
> > That information is not public so it probably should not be added to UDD.
>
> MIA team uses also public information to evaluate a maintainer as MIA
> (for example, the last date of upload), and I think Andreas is
> referring to them.
On Sat, Jun 20, 2009 at 05:50:19PM +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> Amazing, for instance the PTS could make use of the ddtp stats, as the
Once you are mentioning PTS: I'd love to see watch file information
in UDD - but I have no idea how to obtain this. Any volunteer?
Kind regards
And
involving an
> intermediate place where maintainers could push their meta-data, does anybody
> think about an alternative? Andreas Tille suggested me the Package Entropy
> Tracker, but it would limit the system to packages hosted in a Subversion
> repository. This said, since many of the pac
Hi,
I had some discussion with Christoph Haas and he was wondering how
his nice service from screenshots.debian.net might become available
at packages.debian.org. I have no idea who maintains the code but
perhaps somebody might enlighten me (or Christoph) who can implement
a three lines patch whi
Hi
On Fri, Aug 14, 2009 at 9:42 AM, Davide G. M. Salvetti wrote:
> please, stand corrected, as I intend to keep auctex maintenance. Thank
> you for your offer of help, you can start by studying how the software
> is packaged and of course you are welcome to send in patches.
Considering the facts
On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 11:22:17AM +0200, Davide G. M. Salvetti wrote:
> actually I am not presenting any argument.
Your arguing actually was:
... you can start by studying how the software
is packaged and of course you are welcome to send in patches.
as a response to a patch which was provi
Hi,
I just got:
u...@samosa:~$ psql udd
psql (8.4.0)
Type "help" for help.
udd=> SELECT count(*) from popcon;
count
---
0
(1 row)
udd=>
Seems the popcon importer failed in importing any data.
Kind regards
Andreas.
--
http://fam-tille.de
Klarmachen zum Ändern!
--
To UNSU
On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 12:50:26PM +0200, gregor herrmann wrote:
> Probably related, from one of my machines:
>
> 2009-08-25 10:17:08 Start queue run: pid=21322
> 2009-08-25 10:20:17 1MfnTL-0004mI-2p bellini.debian.org [137.82.84.79]
> Connection timed out
> 2009-08-25 10:20:17 1MfnTL-0004mI-2p =
Hi,
I try to create a new watch file for package arb since upstream finally started
to add proper versions to their releases. Unfortunately they do the versioning
in the download directory not the tarball. I tried
version=3
http://download.arb-home.de/release/arb_([\d\.]+)/arbsrc.tgz
but this
Hi,
the upload-history seems to gather its information from
http://qa.debian.org/~filippo/ddc/
but this results in "Not found". Any clue what happened
to this page and where to obtain the information?
Kind regards
Andreas.
--
http://fam-tille.de
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian
[debian-qa in CC because here we are discussing UDD issues.]
On Thu, Oct 22, 2009 at 12:30:06AM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
> First of all, let's summarise the situation. We want to integrate some
> metadata
> in our 'web sentinels', like 'http://debian-med.alioth.debian.org/tasks/bio'.
I would
On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 11:05:10PM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
> For the moment, one has to access an arbitrary key, but later the best would
> be
> to have a special key, for instance YAML-UPDATE, that would force the update.
Or rather "upstream-metadata update". You certainly would not like t
On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 12:00:48AM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
> since BibTeX issues are perhaps a bit specialised for debian-qa, I propose to
> transfer this part of the discussion on debian-scie...@l.d.o, where I reopened
> an old thread.
Well, the question is not really about BibTeX or not. T
1 - 100 of 547 matches
Mail list logo
